Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
162 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Reconfiguration on nowhere dense graph classes (1707.06775v2)

Published 21 Jul 2017 in cs.DM

Abstract: Let $\mathcal{Q}$ be a vertex subset problem on graphs. In a reconfiguration variant of $\mathcal{Q}$ we are given a graph $G$ and two feasible solutions $S_s, S_t\subseteq V(G)$ of $\mathcal{Q}$ with $|S_s|=|S_t|=k$. The problem is to determine whether there exists a sequence $S_1,\ldots,S_n$ of feasible solutions, where $S_1=S_s$, $S_n=S_t$, $|S_i|\leq k\pm 1$, and each $S_{i+1}$ results from $S_i$, $1\leq i<n$, by the addition or removal of a single vertex. We prove that for every nowhere dense class of graphs and for every integer $r\geq 1$ there exists a polynomial $p_r$ such that the reconfiguration variants of the distance-$r$ independent set problem and the distance-$r$ dominating set problem admit kernels of size $p_r(k)$. If $k$ is equal to the size of a minimum distance-$r$ dominating set, then for any fixed $\epsilon\>0$ we even obtain a kernel of almost linear size $\mathcal{O}(k{1+\epsilon})$. We then prove that if a class $\mathcal{C}$ is somewhere dense and closed under taking subgraphs, then for some value of $r\geq 1$ the reconfiguration variants of the above problems on $\mathcal{C}$ are $\mathsf{W}[1]$-hard (and in particular we cannot expect the existence of kernelization algorithms). Hence our results show that the limit of tractability for the reconfiguration variants of the distance-$r$ independent set problem and distance-$r$ dominating set problem on subgraph closed graph classes lies exactly on the boundary between nowhere denseness and somewhere denseness.

Citations (8)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.