Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbation (1704.03296v4)

Abstract: As machine learning algorithms are increasingly applied to high impact yet high risk tasks, such as medical diagnosis or autonomous driving, it is critical that researchers can explain how such algorithms arrived at their predictions. In recent years, a number of image saliency methods have been developed to summarize where highly complex neural networks "look" in an image for evidence for their predictions. However, these techniques are limited by their heuristic nature and architectural constraints. In this paper, we make two main contributions: First, we propose a general framework for learning different kinds of explanations for any black box algorithm. Second, we specialise the framework to find the part of an image most responsible for a classifier decision. Unlike previous works, our method is model-agnostic and testable because it is grounded in explicit and interpretable image perturbations.

• The paper introduces a technique that identifies crucial input regions by applying systematic perturbations to explain predictions.
• It leverages meaningful perturbations to generate clear, interpretable explanations of complex model behaviors.
• Experimental results validate the approach, demonstrating improved interpretability and insight compared to traditional methods.

An Analytical Overview of "LaTeX Author Guidelines for ICCV Proceedings"

This document provides a comprehensive set of guidelines for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) proceedings. The guidelines are meticulously detailed, covering aspects ranging from manuscript formatting to submission policies, offering a framework to ensure uniformity and consistency across submissions.

Abstract

The abstract section of this document instructs authors to format the abstract in fully-justified, italicized text. It emphasizes the importance of succinctness and clarity, restricted to a maximum of 4000 characters. This ensures that the essential information is conveyed efficiently to the reader.

Manuscript Preparation

Language and Paper Length

The guidelines stipulate that all manuscripts must be written in English. A notable change from previous versions is the alteration in paper length requirements. Manuscripts, excluding references, are limited to eight pages, with references allowed on an additional ninth page. Papers exceeding these limits are not reviewed, reflecting a stringent adherence to submission criteria to facilitate effective and fair evaluation.

Blind Review and Dual Submission

The instructions clarify the process of blind review, noting that anonymizing a paper does not necessitate the removal of self-citations, but rather the use of third-person references to one’s own work. Furthermore, the policy on dual submissions is reaffirmed, urging authors to disclose any concurrent submissions to other conferences, which underscores the importance of transparency in the review process.

Formatting Guidelines

Margins, Fonts, and Section Headings

Detailed specifications are provided for page layout, including margins and column widths, ensuring a uniform appearance across all manuscripts. For instance, the text area is specified to be 6-7/8 inches wide by 8-7/8 inches high, with two equal-width columns. A standard font, Times or Times Roman, is prescribed for consistency.

Figures, Tables, and Mathematical Notations

The guidelines also extend to figures, tables, and mathematical notations, stressing clarity and consistency in their presentation. Figure captions should be in 9-point Roman type, and displayed equations must be numbered for easy reference. This level of detail aids in maintaining a professional and readable document structure.

Technical Considerations

The Ruler and Footnotes

A unique feature of the ICCV submission guidelines is the inclusion of a printed ruler on draft versions to assist reviewers in pinpointing specific lines for commentary. Authors are advised to handle footnotes sparingly, preferring instead to include ancillary observations within the main text.

Final Submission

For the camera-ready version, authors must remove the ruler and include a signed IEEE copyright release form. This administrative detail is crucial for the publication process.

Implications and Future Developments

The meticulous nature of these guidelines reflects the high standards expected at ICCV, which undoubtedly contribute to the overall quality and uniformity of published papers. Practically, these guidelines facilitate a streamlined review process and ensure that all submissions are presented in a professional and consistent manner. Theoretically, adherence to such detailed protocols could influence standards at other conferences, promoting a broader adoption of stringent submission norms.

The ongoing refinement of such guidelines could foreseeably lead to even more automated compliance checks within manuscript preparation systems, reducing manual oversight and expediting the submission process. As artificial intelligence and natural language processing technologies advance, they could be leveraged to assist authors in adhering to these complex formatting rules, thereby enhancing efficiency and compliance.

In summary, the "LaTeX Author Guidelines for ICCV Proceedings" document provides essential, detailed instructions for manuscript preparation, ensuring high standards and uniformity across submissions. The specificity of these guidelines helps authors present their research effectively, facilitating a fair and efficient review process.