Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Dominant Strategy Truthful, Deterministic Multi-Armed Bandit Mechanism with Logarithmic Regret (1703.00632v2)

Published 2 Mar 2017 in cs.GT

Abstract: Stochastic multi-armed bandit (MAB) mechanisms are widely used in sponsored search auctions, crowdsourcing, online procurement, etc. Existing stochastic MAB mechanisms with a deterministic payment rule, proposed in the literature, necessarily suffer a regret of $\Omega(T{2/3})$, where $T$ is the number of time steps. This happens because the existing mechanisms consider the worst case scenario where the means of the agents' stochastic rewards are separated by a very small amount that depends on $T$. We make, and, exploit the crucial observation that in most scenarios, the separation between the agents' rewards is rarely a function of $T$. Moreover, in the case that the rewards of the arms are arbitrarily close, the regret contributed by such sub-optimal arms is minimal. Our idea is to allow the center to indicate the resolution, $\Delta$, with which the agents must be distinguished. This immediately leads us to introduce the notion of $\Delta$-Regret. Using sponsored search auctions as a concrete example (the same idea applies for other applications as well), we propose a dominant strategy incentive compatible (DSIC) and individually rational (IR), deterministic MAB mechanism, based on ideas from the Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) family of MAB algorithms. Remarkably, the proposed mechanism $\Delta$-UCB achieves a $\Delta$-regret of $O(\log T)$ for the case of sponsored search auctions. We first establish the results for single slot sponsored search auctions and then non-trivially extend the results to the case where multiple slots are to be allocated.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Divya Padmanabhan (9 papers)
  2. Satyanath Bhat (7 papers)
  3. Prabuchandran K. J. (13 papers)
  4. Shirish Shevade (18 papers)
  5. Y. Narahari (47 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.