Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Variational Inference using Implicit Distributions (1702.08235v1)

Published 27 Feb 2017 in stat.ML and cs.LG

Abstract: Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have given us a great tool to fit implicit generative models to data. Implicit distributions are ones we can sample from easily, and take derivatives of samples with respect to model parameters. These models are highly expressive and we argue they can prove just as useful for variational inference (VI) as they are for generative modelling. Several papers have proposed GAN-like algorithms for inference, however, connections to the theory of VI are not always well understood. This paper provides a unifying review of existing algorithms establishing connections between variational autoencoders, adversarially learned inference, operator VI, GAN-based image reconstruction, and more. Secondly, the paper provides a framework for building new algorithms: depending on the way the variational bound is expressed we introduce prior-contrastive and joint-contrastive methods, and show practical inference algorithms based on either density ratio estimation or denoising.

Variational Inference Using Implicit Distributions

The paper "Variational Inference using Implicit Distributions" by Ferenc Huszár offers significant insight into the application of implicit distributions for variational inference (VI) within probabilistic machine learning. The work expands on the utility of generative adversarial networks (GANs) in fitting implicit generative models to data and extends these concepts to the field of VI, particularly for latent variable models.

Primary Contributions and Methodology

  1. Unifying Theoretical Framework: The paper provides a comprehensive review of existing methodologies, establishing theoretical connections between GAN-based approaches and various VI strategies, such as variational autoencoders (VAEs), adversarially learned inference, and operator VI. It unifies these under a single framework, enhancing the understanding of VI processes through implicit distributions across different domains.
  2. Algorithmic Developments: The authors introduce novel algorithmic frameworks categorized as prior-contrastive and joint-contrastive methods. These paradigms are based on different formulations of the variational bound and offer practical inference solutions using either density ratio estimation or denoising approaches. The paper classifies a range of algorithms, some leveraging adversarial training and others utilizing denoising techniques.
  3. Implicit Distributions in VI: The investigation into implicit distributions addresses the limitations of traditional VI methods, which often rely on explicit distributions with tractable densities. By employing implicit models, which allow for sample generation and gradient estimations without explicitly defined densities, the paper demonstrates an enhanced capacity to approximate complex posterior distributions with greater expressiveness.
  4. Algorithmic Taxonomy: A summary table within the paper systematically categorizes a range of algorithms on their capability to handle implicit distributions across prior, likelihood, and posterior components. This classification illustrates the versatility and applicability of different algorithms in achieving accurate variational inference.

Key Results and Implications

The paper presents algorithms, including PC-Adv and JC-Adv, that integrate adversarial and denoising techniques to estimate the gradients or density ratios required for effective VI. These algorithms demonstrate significant potential in practical scenarios where implicit models are needed due to intractable densities of underlying probabilistic models.

Theoretical contributions such as the joint-contrastive and prior-contrastive formulations of ELBO (evidence lower bound) provide distinct strategies for practitioners to tackle variational inference in complex probabilistic settings. The algorithms cater to situations where the likelihood is either explicitly defined or entirely implicit, underscoring their broad applicability.

Future Directions

This research opens up several avenues for future exploration:

  • Extension of Denoising Techniques: The work suggests the potential for enhanced denoising strategies that can match or surpass adversarial counterparts in modeling precision and stability.
  • Full Variational Learning with Implicit Models: While the current approach primarily aids in inference, further exploration is warranted to enable complete variational learning of model parameters where implicits are extensively applied.
  • Algorithmic Synergies: Exploration of hybrid models that effectively combine adversarial and denoising methods could lead to more robust and flexible inference algorithms.

By bridging implicit distribution techniques with VI, this paper provides a valuable expansion to existing VI practices, promising enhanced expressiveness and accuracy in modeling complex probabilistic systems, particularly within AI and machine learning frameworks.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (1)
  1. Ferenc Huszár (26 papers)
Citations (131)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com