Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Refined Vertex Sparsifiers of Planar Graphs (1702.05951v3)

Published 20 Feb 2017 in cs.DS

Abstract: We study the following version of cut sparsification. Given a large edge-weighted network $G$ with $k$ terminal vertices, compress it into a smaller network $H$ with the same terminals, such that every minimum terminal cut in $H$ approximates the corresponding one in $G$, up to a factor $q\geq 1$ that is called the quality. (The case $q=1$ is known also as a mimicking network). We provide new insights about the structure of minimum terminal cuts, leading to new results for cut sparsifiers of planar graphs. Our first contribution identifies a subset of the minimum terminal cuts, which we call elementary, that generates all the others. Consequently, $H$ is a cut sparsifier if and only if it preserves all the elementary terminal cuts (up to this factor $q$). This structural characterization lead to improved bounds on the size of $H$. For example, it improve the bound of mimicking-network size for planar graphs into a near-optimal one. Our second and main contribution is to refine the known bounds in terms of $\gamma=\gamma(G)$, which is defined as the minimum number of faces that are incident to all the terminals in a planar graph $G$. We prove that the number of elementary terminal cuts is $O((2k/\gamma){2\gamma})$ (compared to $O(2k)$ terminal cuts), and furthermore obtain a mimicking-network of size $O(\gamma 2{2\gamma} k4)$, which is near-optimal as a function of $\gamma$. In the analysis we break the elementary terminal cuts into fragments, and count them carefully. Our third contribution is a duality between cut sparsification and distance sparsification for certain planar graphs, when the sparsifier $H$ is required to be a minor of $G$. This duality connects problems that were previously studied separately, implying new results, new proofs of known results, and equivalences between open gaps.

Citations (28)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.