Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Hardness of Covering Alignment: Phase Transition in Post-Sequence Genomics (1611.05086v2)

Published 15 Nov 2016 in cs.CC

Abstract: Covering alignment problems arise from recent developments in genomics; so called pan-genome graphs are replacing reference genomes, and advances in haplotyping enable full content of diploid genomes to be used as basis of sequence analysis. In this paper, we show that the computational complexity will change for natural extensions of alignments to pan-genome representations and to diploid genomes. More broadly, our approach can also be seen as a minimal extension of sequence alignment to labelled directed acyclic graphs (labeled DAGs). Namely, we show that finding a \emph{covering alignment} of two labeled DAGs is NP-hard even on binary alphabets. A covering alignment asks for two paths $R_1$ (red) and $G_1$ (green) in DAG $D_1$ and two paths $R_2$ (red) and $G_2$ (green) in DAG $D_2$ that cover the nodes of the graphs and maximize the sum of the global alignment scores: $\mathsf{as}(\mathsf{sp}(R_1),\mathsf{sp}(R_2))+\mathsf{as}(\mathsf{sp}(G_1),\mathsf{sp}(G_2))$, where $\mathsf{sp}(P)$ is the concatenation of labels on the path $P$. Pair-wise alignment of haplotype sequences forming a diploid chromosome can be converted to a two-path coverable labelled DAG, and then the covering alignment models the similarity of two diploids over arbitrary recombinations. We also give a reduction to the other direction, to show that such a recombination-oblivious diploid alignment is NP-hard on alphabets of size $3$.

Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.