Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
107 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
58 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
20 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
20 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
101 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
84 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
463 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
200 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Effective-one-body waveforms for binary neutron stars using surrogate models (1610.04742v1)

Published 15 Oct 2016 in gr-qc

Abstract: Gravitational-wave observations of binary neutron star systems can provide information about the masses, spins, and structure of neutron stars. However, this requires accurate and computationally efficient waveform models that take <1s to evaluate for use in Bayesian parameter estimation codes that perform 107 - 108 waveform evaluations. We present a surrogate model of a nonspinning effective-one-body waveform model with l = 2, 3, and 4 tidal multipole moments that reproduces waveforms of binary neutron star numerical simulations up to merger. The surrogate is built from compact sets of effective-one-body waveform amplitude and phase data that each form a reduced basis. We find that 12 amplitude and 7 phase basis elements are sufficient to reconstruct any binary neutron star waveform with a starting frequency of 10Hz. The surrogate has maximum errors of 3.8% in amplitude (0.04% excluding the last 100M before merger) and 0.043 radians in phase. The version implemented in the LIGO Algorithm Library takes ~0.07s to evaluate for a starting frequency of 30Hz and ~0.8s for a starting frequency of 10Hz, resulting in a speed-up factor of ~103 - 104 relative to the original Matlab code. This allows parameter estimation codes to run in days to weeks rather than years, and we demonstrate this with a Nested Sampling run that recovers the masses and tidal parameters of a simulated binary neutron star system.

Citations (52)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.