Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
175 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

TI-POOLING: transformation-invariant pooling for feature learning in Convolutional Neural Networks (1604.06318v2)

Published 21 Apr 2016 in cs.CV

Abstract: In this paper we present a deep neural network topology that incorporates a simple to implement transformation invariant pooling operator (TI-POOLING). This operator is able to efficiently handle prior knowledge on nuisance variations in the data, such as rotation or scale changes. Most current methods usually make use of dataset augmentation to address this issue, but this requires larger number of model parameters and more training data, and results in significantly increased training time and larger chance of under- or overfitting. The main reason for these drawbacks is that the learned model needs to capture adequate features for all the possible transformations of the input. On the other hand, we formulate features in convolutional neural networks to be transformation-invariant. We achieve that using parallel siamese architectures for the considered transformation set and applying the TI-POOLING operator on their outputs before the fully-connected layers. We show that this topology internally finds the most optimal "canonical" instance of the input image for training and therefore limits the redundancy in learned features. This more efficient use of training data results in better performance on popular benchmark datasets with smaller number of parameters when comparing to standard convolutional neural networks with dataset augmentation and to other baselines.

Citations (250)

Summary

  • The paper introduces TI-pooling, a method that embeds transformation invariance into CNNs, reducing the need for extensive data augmentation.
  • It utilizes parallel siamese architectures to process transformed inputs and aggregates features using a max operator for robust recognition.
  • Experiments on rotated MNIST and segmentation tasks show that TI-pooling lowers error rates and simplifies training compared to traditional methods.

Transformation-Invariant Pooling in Convolutional Neural Networks

The paper "TI-pooling: transformation-invariant pooling for feature learning in Convolutional Neural Networks", authored by Dmitry Laptev, Nikolay Savinov, Joachim M. Buhmann, and Marc Pollefeys, presents an innovative network architecture designed to address the challenge of achieving transformation invariance in deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Traditional approaches to managing variations such as rotation or scale changes often rely on data augmentation techniques. However, these methods have significant drawbacks: they require a large number of parameters, increased training data, and lead to complex training processes that are prone to overfitting. The authors propose a novel approach, TI-pooling (transformation-invariant pooling), which aims to intrinsically incorporate transformation invariance within the CNN feature learning process.

Core Contributions and Methodology

The paper introduces a deep neural network topology that integrates TI-pooling, effectively eliminating the pitfalls associated with data augmentation for transformation invariance. By employing parallel siamese architectures that process multiple instances of the input—each transformed according to a predefined set of transformations—the CNN can learn features that are inherently invariant to these transformations. The TI-pooling operator aggregates these features by applying a max operation over the outputs corresponding to different transformations, ensuring that the resultant features are invariant.

The authors provide a thorough theoretical grounding, asserting that the transformation-invariance is guaranteed under certain conditions—specifically when the transformation set forms a group. Empirically, the paper demonstrates that TI-pooling not only reduces the number of necessary parameters but also improves the network's performance, achieving superior results on well-known benchmark datasets with less training overhead.

Experimental Evaluation

The effectiveness of the TI-pooling technique is evaluated across different datasets:

  1. Rotated MNIST: The network with TI-pooling significantly outperforms previous models, achieving a 1.2% error rate compared to prior results of 4.2% using restricted Boltzmann machines. This illustrates the model's adeptness at learning transformation-invariant features, resulting in improved recognition accuracy over traditional data augmentation methods.
  2. Half-rotated MNIST: The paper exhibits comparable performance to the state-of-the-art spatial transformer networks (STN), achieving an error rate of 0.8%. Despite STN's more complex approach to learning transformation parameters, TI-pooling provides a simpler and quicker alternative for achieving similar results by effectively utilizing domain-specific transformations.
  3. Neuronal Structure Segmentation: This real-world application shows the practical value of TI-pooling. The proposed model achieves a lower error rate than both the multiple instance learning (MIL) approach and CNNs with augmentation, highlighting TI-pooling's capacity to enhance performance by exploiting transformation-invariant representation learning.

Implications and Future Directions

The paper's contribution extends beyond immediate performance improvements; it introduces a flexible framework for embedding expert knowledge about domain-specific nuisances directly into the feature learning process. This approach holds potential for applications in fields such as medical imaging, where orientation and scale can be critical for accurate diagnosis. Additionally, the idea of canonical instance identification through maximum response learning offers an efficient method to utilize training data more effectively, potentially reducing the demand for large datasets and high computational resources.

Moving forward, the implications of TI-pooling could be further investigated in dynamic environments with more complex transformations, such as video data or 3D structures. Integration with other emerging techniques, such as reinforcement learning or unsupervised learning paradigms, might provide additional pathways for refining transformation-invariant feature learning. As deep learning continues to integrate with fields demanding high precision and domain adaptability, techniques like TI-pooling will likely play a crucial role in bridging the gap between raw data variability and learned model robustness.