Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Subexponential parameterized algorithms for planar and apex-minor-free graphs via low treewidth pattern covering (1604.05999v1)

Published 20 Apr 2016 in cs.DS

Abstract: We prove the following theorem. Given a planar graph $G$ and an integer $k$, it is possible in polynomial time to randomly sample a subset $A$ of vertices of $G$ with the following properties: (i) $A$ induces a subgraph of $G$ of treewidth $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{k}\log k)$, and (ii) for every connected subgraph $H$ of $G$ on at most $k$ vertices, the probability that $A$ covers the whole vertex set of $H$ is at least $(2{\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{k}\log2 k)}\cdot n{\mathcal{O}(1)}){-1}$, where $n$ is the number of vertices of $G$. Together with standard dynamic programming techniques for graphs of bounded treewidth, this result gives a versatile technique for obtaining (randomized) subexponential parameterized algorithms for problems on planar graphs, usually with running time bound $2{\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{k} \log2 k)} n{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. The technique can be applied to problems expressible as searching for a small, connected pattern with a prescribed property in a large host graph, examples of such problems include Directed $k$-Path, Weighted $k$-Path, Vertex Cover Local Search, and Subgraph Isomorphism, among others. Up to this point, it was open whether these problems can be solved in subexponential parameterized time on planar graphs, because they are not amenable to the classic technique of bidimensionality. Furthermore, all our results hold in fact on any class of graphs that exclude a fixed apex graph as a minor, in particular on graphs embeddable in any fixed surface.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Fedor V. Fomin (137 papers)
  2. Daniel Lokshtanov (135 papers)
  3. Marcin Pilipczuk (115 papers)
  4. Michał Pilipczuk (161 papers)
  5. Saket Saurabh (171 papers)
  6. Dániel Marx (79 papers)
Citations (30)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.