Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Temporal meta-states are associated with differential patterns of dynamic connectivity, network topology and attention (1601.05065v2)

Published 19 Jan 2016 in q-bio.NC

Abstract: Little is currently known about the coordination of neural activity over longitudinal time-scales and how these changes relate to behavior. To investigate this issue, we used resting-state fMRI data from a single individual to identify the presence of two distinct temporal states that fluctuated over the course of 18 months. We then demonstrated that these temporal states were associated with distinct neural dynamics within individual scanning sessions. In addition, the temporal states were also related to significant alterations in global efficiency, as well as differences in self-reported attention. These patterns were replicated in a separate longitudinal dataset, providing further supportive evidence for the presence of fluctuations in functional network topology over time. Together, our results underscore the importance of longitudinal phenotyping in cognitive neuroscience.

Citations (182)

Summary

Temporal Metastates and Their Impact on Brain Connectivity

This paper investigates the dynamic nature of brain connectivity over prolonged periods using time-resolved resting-state fMRI data from an individual participant. Specifically, the authors aimed to elucidate the interplay between temporal brain states and functional connectivity patterns, examining how these may correlate with variability in network topology and self-reported attention.

The paper utilizes a longitudinal single-subject model to observe fluctuations in brain connectivity, identifying two distinct temporal metastates. Through robust analysis using affinity propagation clustering, the researchers revealed significant differences in these metastates beyond what a stationary model would predict (P < 0.001). The presence of these metastates was corroborated using data from a separate longitudinal cohort, reinforcing the notion of functional network topology fluctuations over time.

Key methodological advances include the application of Multiplication of Temporal Derivatives (MTD) to capture time-resolved functional connectivity, which demonstrated enhanced sensitivity to dynamic shifts compared to traditional sliding window correlations. The results indicate distinct patterns of connectivity across different brain regions, particularly in terms of flexibility — regions within the visual, somatomotor, frontoparietal, and cingulo-opercular networks showed varying degrees of flexibility between metastates.

A salient discovery was the association between these metastates and changes in global network efficiency and self-reported attentional states. Metastate 2 was characterized by increased global efficiency (E = 0.312 ± 0.02; P = 0.002) and greater cognitive engagement, contrasting with a more static global architecture in metastate 1. Intriguingly, attention-related behaviors correlated positively with periods marked by metastate 2, whereas traits related to fatigue aligned with metastate 1. This suggests a dynamic underpinning to attention modulation that may reflect broader cognitive processes involved in normal function and potentially pathological states.

By replicating findings across datasets, the research underscored the stability of these dynamic connectivity patterns, alluding to inherent temporal variability in neural networks. Despite individual differences and scanning protocol disparities between subjects, the paper reaffirms the significance of considering longitudinal changes in brain connectivity for comprehensive phenotyping in cognitive neuroscience.

The implications of these findings are manifold, expanding the conceptual framework within which we approach brain network adaptability. Practically, this research suggests possible biomarkers for tracking neuropsychological disorders, where fluctuations in mental states may correspond with metastate dynamics. Theoretically, it posits that temporal shifts in connectivity could play a critical role in neural processes like learning and adaptation.

Future research directions might include exploring the implications of metastates in clinical cohorts, perhaps investigating whether similar connectivity patterns are present in those with cognitive disorders such as Alzheimer's disease or schizophrenia. Simultaneously, efforts could be made to integrate electrophysiological measures, such as EEG, to further correlate behavioral states with these connectivity changes.

In summary, this paper provides substantial evidence of the brain's temporal metastates influencing cognitive function through dynamic connectivity. The findings emphasize the necessity for longitudinal paper paradigms in cognitive neuroscience, with potential applications in clinical diagnostics and the enriched understanding of neural networks' functional capacities.