Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
134 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Rational Mode Locking for Homeomorphisms of the 2-Torus (1508.02597v2)

Published 11 Aug 2015 in math.DS

Abstract: Let $f:{\rm T2\rightarrow T2}$ be a homeomorphism homotopic to the identity, $\widetilde{f}:{\rm I}\negthinspace {\rm R2\rightarrow I} \negthinspace {\rm R2}$ be a fixed lift and $\rho (\widetilde{f})$ be its rotation set, which we assume to have interior. We also assume that some rational point $(\frac pq,\frac rq)\in \partial \rho (\widetilde{f})$ and we want to understand how stable this situation is. To be more precise, we want to know if it is possible to find two different homeomorphisms, which are arbitrarily small $C0$-perturbations of $f,$ denoted $f_1$ and $f_2,$ in a way that $(\frac pq,\frac rq)$ does not belong to the rotation set of $f_1$ and $(\frac pq,\frac rq)$ is contained in the interior of the rotation set of $f_2.$ We give two examples in this direction. The first is a $C\infty $-diffeomorphism $f_{dissip},$ such that $(0,0)\in \partial \rho (\widetilde{f}{dissip}),$ $f{dissip}$ has only one fixed point with zero rotation vector and there are maps $f_1$ and $f_2$ satisfying the conditions above. The second is an area preserving version of the above, but in this conservative setting we obtain only a $C0$ example. We also present two theorems in the opposite direction. The first says that if $f$ is area preserving and analytic, then there can not be $f_1$ and $f_2$ as above. The second result, implies that for a generic (in the sense of Brunovsky) one parameter family $% f_t:{\rm T2\rightarrow T2}$ of $C1$-diffeomorphisms such that for some parameter $\overline{t},$ $\rho (\widetilde{f}{\overline{t}})$ has interior, $(\frac pq,\frac rq) \in \partial \rho (\widetilde{f}{\overline{t}})$ and $(\frac pq,\frac rq)\notin \rho (\widetilde{f}t)$ for $t<\overline{t},$ then for all $t> \overline{t}$ sufficiently close to $\overline{t},$ $(\frac pq,\frac rq)\notin int(\rho ( \widetilde{f}{\overline{t}})).$

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.