Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Compressive Detection of Random Subspace Signals (1507.02999v2)

Published 10 Jul 2015 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: The problem of compressive detection of random subspace signals is studied. We consider signals modeled as $\mathbf{s} = \mathbf{H} \mathbf{x}$ where $\mathbf{H}$ is an $N \times K$ matrix with $K \le N$ and $\mathbf{x} \sim \mathcal{N}(\mathbf{0}_{K,1},\sigma_x2 \mathbf{I}_K)$. We say that signal $\mathbf{s}$ lies in or leans toward a subspace if the largest eigenvalue of $\mathbf{H} \mathbf{H}T$ is strictly greater than its smallest eigenvalue. We first design a measurement matrix $\mathbf{\Phi}=[\mathbf{\Phi}_sT,\mathbf{\Phi}_oT]T$ comprising of two sub-matrices $\mathbf{\Phi}_s$ and $\mathbf{\Phi}_o$ where $\mathbf{\Phi}_s$ projects the signals to the strongest left-singular vectors, i.e., the left-singular vectors corresponding to the largest singular values, of subspace matrix $\mathbf{H}$ and $\mathbf{\Phi}_o$ projects it to the weakest left-singular vectors. We then propose two detectors which work based on the difference in energies of the samples measured by two sub-matrices $\mathbf{\Phi}_s$ and $\mathbf{\Phi}_o$ and prove their optimality. Simplified versions of the proposed detectors for the case when the variance of noise is known are also provided. Furthermore, we study the performance of the detector when measurements are imprecise and show how imprecision can be compensated by employing more measurement devices. The problem is then re-formulated for the case when the signal lies in the union of a finite number of linear subspaces instead of a single linear subspace. Finally, we study the performance of the proposed methods by simulation examples.

Citations (24)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.