Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

From Captions to Visual Concepts and Back (1411.4952v3)

Published 18 Nov 2014 in cs.CV and cs.CL
From Captions to Visual Concepts and Back

Abstract: This paper presents a novel approach for automatically generating image descriptions: visual detectors, LLMs, and multimodal similarity models learnt directly from a dataset of image captions. We use multiple instance learning to train visual detectors for words that commonly occur in captions, including many different parts of speech such as nouns, verbs, and adjectives. The word detector outputs serve as conditional inputs to a maximum-entropy LLM. The LLM learns from a set of over 400,000 image descriptions to capture the statistics of word usage. We capture global semantics by re-ranking caption candidates using sentence-level features and a deep multimodal similarity model. Our system is state-of-the-art on the official Microsoft COCO benchmark, producing a BLEU-4 score of 29.1%. When human judges compare the system captions to ones written by other people on our held-out test set, the system captions have equal or better quality 34% of the time.

From Captions to Visual Concepts and Back: An Overview

The paper "From Captions to Visual Concepts and Back" presents a comprehensive method for generating image descriptions by leveraging visual detectors, LLMs (LMs), and multimodal similarity metrics. The approach focuses on learning directly from a dataset of image captions rather than relying on separately hand-labeled datasets. This paradigm shift offers distinct advantages: it inherently emphasizes salient content, captures commonsense knowledge from language statistics, and enables the measurement of global similarity between images and text.

Methodology

The authors present a multi-stage pipeline designed to automatically generate captions:

  1. Word Detection:
    • The system employs Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) to train visual detectors for words frequently found in captions, spanning various parts of speech such as nouns, verbs, and adjectives. The visual detectors operate on image sub-regions, categorized using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to extract relevant features. To overcome the lack of bounding box annotations, the MIL framework reasons over image sub-regions and maps features to likely words.
  2. LLM:
    • Leveraging a Maximum Entropy (ME) LLM trained on over 400,000 image captions, the word detection scores serve as conditional inputs to generate high-likelihood sentences. This LLM is adept at capturing the statistical structure of language, important for ensuring the generated captions make logical and grammatical sense.
  3. Sentence Re-Ranking:
    • To ensure the quality of generated captions, the system re-ranks a set of candidate sentences using a Deep Multimodal Similarity Model (DMSM). This model learns to map both images and text to a common vector space where the similarity between them can be easily measured.

Evaluations and Results

The effectiveness of the proposed method was evaluated using the Microsoft COCO benchmark and the PASCAL dataset:

  1. Microsoft COCO:
    • The system achieved a BLEU-4 score of 29.1%, outperforming human-generated captions based on various metrics. Furthermore, human judges rated the system-generated captions to be of equal or better quality compared to human captions 34% of the time.
  2. PASCAL Dataset:
    • The approach also showed noteworthy gains over previous methods for the PASCAL dataset, particularly the Midge and Baby Talk systems. The BLEU and METEOR scores highlighted a significant performance improvement.

Implications and Future Directions

The proposed method demonstrates the utility of integrating visual and linguistic components in generating meaningful and coherent image descriptions. The advantages of training directly on captions rather than separately labeled datasets reflect a pragmatic approach in dealing with caption generation tasks, particularly in capturing the nuances and context-dependent information of images.

While achieving state-of-the-art performance on several metrics and datasets, future work can explore improving various aspects:

  • Refinement of Word Detectors:
    • Enhancing the accuracy of word detection, especially for abstract and context-dependent adjectives and verbs, could further improve caption quality.
  • Integration of More Sophisticated LMs:
    • Exploring more advanced LLMing techniques, such as transformer-based architectures, can potentially bring improvements in generating more natural sentences.
  • Enhanced Multimodal Representations:
    • Further refinement of the DMSM and exploring newer multimodal representation techniques to better capture the interplay between visual and textual data.

Conclusion

"From Captions to Visual Concepts and Back" presents a robust and comprehensive approach to the automated generation of image descriptions. By training directly on image captions and leveraging multiple computational techniques, the paper showcases significant advancements in the field of image caption generation. The implications of this research point toward more nuanced and contextually aware AI systems capable of understanding and describing complex scenes, contributing valuable insights to both theoretical and practical domains of artificial intelligence.

The approach sets a foundation for continued innovation, emphasizing the importance of combining various AI techniques to tackle multifaceted problems in computer vision and natural language processing.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (12)
  1. Hao Fang (88 papers)
  2. Saurabh Gupta (96 papers)
  3. Forrest Iandola (23 papers)
  4. Rupesh Srivastava (3 papers)
  5. Li Deng (76 papers)
  6. Piotr Dollár (49 papers)
  7. Jianfeng Gao (344 papers)
  8. Xiaodong He (162 papers)
  9. Margaret Mitchell (43 papers)
  10. John C. Platt (7 papers)
  11. C. Lawrence Zitnick (50 papers)
  12. Geoffrey Zweig (20 papers)
Citations (1,286)