Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
149 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Clingo = ASP + Control: Preliminary Report (1405.3694v1)

Published 14 May 2014 in cs.PL

Abstract: We present the new ASP system clingo 4. Unlike its predecessors, being mere monolithic combinations of the grounder gringo with the solver clasp, the new clingo 4 series offers high-level constructs for realizing complex reasoning processes. Among others, such processes feature advanced forms of search, as in optimization or theory solving, or even interact with an environment, as in robotics or query-answering. Common to them is that the problem specification evolves during the reasoning process, either because data or constraints are added, deleted, or replaced. In fact, clingo 4 carries out such complex reasoning within a single integrated ASP grounding and solving process. This avoids redundancies in relaunching grounder and solver programs and benefits from the solver's learning capacities. clingo 4 accomplishes this by complementing ASP's declarative input language by control capacities expressed via the embedded scripting languages lua and python. On the declarative side, clingo 4 offers a new directive that allows for structuring logic programs into named and parameterizable subprograms. The grounding and integration of these subprograms into the solving process is completely modular and fully controllable from the procedural side, viz. the scripting languages. By strictly separating logic and control programs, clingo 4 also abolishes the need for dedicated systems for incremental and reactive reasoning, like iclingo and oclingo, respectively, and its flexibility goes well beyond the advanced yet still rigid solving processes of the latter.

Citations (322)

Summary

  • The paper presents clingo 4, integrating Answer Set Programming with procedural control via scripting languages to enhance dynamic reasoning processes.
  • Clingo 4's architecture simplifies dynamic tasks, replacing specialized systems and offering flexible handling of evolving programs and data.
  • Practically, Clingo 4 extends ASP applications to dynamic domains like real-time systems and optimization by allowing procedural control over logic programs.

Analysis of "Clingo = ASP + Control: Preliminary Report"

The paper "Clingo = ASP + Control: Preliminary Report" by Martin Gebser, Roland Kaminski, Benjamin Kaufmann, and Torsten Schaub presents an advancement in the field of Answer Set Programming (ASP) with the development of the clingo 4 series. This system enhances the existing framework of ASP by integrating control mechanisms via scripting languages, thus providing a more sophisticated environment for complex reasoning processes that necessitate dynamic interaction with data and constraints.

Core Contributions

The pivotal enhancement of clingo 4 is its ability to couple the ASP declarative programming with procedural control capacities facilitated through embedded scripting languages such as Lua and Python. This integration allows for a modular structuring of logic programs into named subprograms, which can be independently controlled during grounding and solving. The directives, such as #program and #external, enhance the adaptability of the ASP solution process, accommodating changes such as the addition or removal of data, a feature that is particularly useful in contexts like robotics, stream processing, and optimization problems.

Clingo 4's modular architecture eliminates the need for dedicated systems like iclingo and oclingo by offering a more flexible control over incremental and reactive reasoning processes. This not only simplifies the ASP system architecture but significantly broadens the range of problems that can be tackled with ASP methodologies.

Numerical Strengths and Claims

A significant claim in the paper is the abolishment of the need for specialized systems like iclingo and oclingo, thanks to the flexible control provided by clingo 4. This is made possible by allowing the logic and control programs to be strictly separated, thus facilitating more complex reasoning tasks without the constraints of a rigid control structure. The paper provides insights into how a Python script can encapsulate an incremental control loop, underscoring clingo 4's capacity to handle dynamic program evolution efficiently.

Furthermore, the introduction of #external directives allows for a more flexible handling of undefined atoms. This feature caters to evolving reasoning processes by enabling the declaration and continuous adjustment of input atoms, which is a departure from the fixed assignment approach of previous systems. This adaptability is crucial for optimizing complex reasoning tasks, such as multi-objective optimization and heuristic search.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

The practical implications of clingo 4 are vast, extending ASP's applicability to new domains requiring dynamic problem specifications like real-time applications and interactive problem-solving environments. By allowing procedural control over logic programs via well-established scripting languages, clingo 4 equips users with tools to execute complex reasoning patterns that evolve in response to external stimuli or time increments.

On a theoretical level, the clingo 4 architecture invites further exploration into the semantic implications of its module-based program control system. This invites research into broader applications of module theory in logic programming, potentially leading to new developments in how logic programs can be updated or reasoned about incrementally.

Speculation on Future Developments

Looking forward, the capabilities introduced by clingo 4 set a precedent for future research in AI and logic programming. It paves the way for developing even more sophisticated ASP systems that could seamlessly integrate with other computational paradigms. Enhancements in clingo 4 open opportunities for further research into optimization techniques, especially focusing on dynamic environments and integrating ASP with other computational logic systems such as Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSP).

Additionally, the introduction of clingo 4 raises questions on the possible integration with external theories and SAT-like solvers to create hybrid approaches that could handle both ASP and other logic paradigms within a unified framework.

Overall, the clingo 4 system represents a substantial step in merging ASP with procedural control, offering a robust platform for developing and executing complex reasoning processes. This paper lays the groundwork for both practical applications in dynamic domains and theoretical advancements in the logic programming community.