Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Electric Vehicle Charging Station Placement: Formulation, Complexity, and Solutions (1310.6925v3)

Published 24 Oct 2013 in cs.SY and math.OC

Abstract: To enhance environmental sustainability, many countries will electrify their transportation systems in their future smart city plans. So the number of electric vehicles (EVs) running in a city will grow significantly. There are many ways to re-charge EVs' batteries and charging stations will be considered as the main source of energy. The locations of charging stations are critical; they should not only be pervasive enough such that an EV anywhere can easily access a charging station within its driving range, but also widely spread so that EVs can cruise around the whole city upon being re-charged. Based on these new perspectives, we formulate the Electric Vehicle Charging Station Placement Problem (EVCSPP) in this paper. We prove that the problem is non-deterministic polynomial-time hard. We also propose four solution methods to tackle EVCSPP and evaluate their performance on various artificial and practical cases. As verified by the simulation results, the methods have their own characteristics and they are suitable for different situations depending on the requirements for solution quality, algorithmic efficiency, problem size, nature of the algorithm, and existence of system prerequisite.

Citations (377)

Summary

  • The paper formulates the EV charging station placement problem as an NP-hard optimization task via a reduction from the vertex cover problem.
  • It introduces four solution methods—iterative MILP, greedy algorithm, effective MILP, and chemical reaction optimization—to balance computational efficiency and optimality.
  • The research provides actionable insights for smart city planning, guiding policy and investment in sustainable urban EV infrastructure.

Electric Vehicle Charging Station Placement: Formulation, Complexity, and Solutions

The proliferation of electric vehicles (EVs) as central elements of urban transportation systems necessitates strategic planning of EV charging infrastructure within cities. The paper "Electric Vehicle Charging Station Placement: Formulation, Complexity, and Solutions" by Albert Y.S. Lam, Yiu-Wing Leung, and Xiaowen Chu from Hong Kong Baptist University, addresses this essential aspect of smart city planning by introducing and analyzing the Electric Vehicle Charging Station Placement Problem (EVCSPP).

Formulation and Complexity

The authors formulate the EVCSPP as an optimization problem aimed at minimizing the construction cost of a network of charging stations under constraints ensuring accessibility and convenience for EV users. The city is represented as an undirected graph, with potential sites for charging stations as nodes and road connections as edges. The distances are based on minimum traversal routes, not merely Euclidean metrics, making the problem more reflective of real-world urban geography.

The EVCSPP is proven to be NP-hard, a complexity class indicating non-deterministic polynomial-time hard problems. More specifically, a reduction from the vertex cover problem—a classical NP-complete problem—demonstrates EVCSPP's computational complexity. This complexity necessitates the development of specialized algorithms and heuristics to obtain practical solutions.

Proposed Solutions

Given the NP-hard nature of EVCSPP, four solution methods have been proposed:

  1. Iterative Mixed-Integer Linear Program (MILP): This method involves solving a series of MILP problems for different nodes within the graph, each representing a potential charging station. While capable of finding optimal solutions for smaller instances, its computational demands escalate with increasing problem size.
  2. Greedy Algorithm: This heuristic method simplifies the problem by iteratively refining an initial solution of all nodes included as stations. It removes nodes from the solution as long as constraints are satisfied, seeking a balance between solution quality and computational efficiency. It is sub-optimal but faster for larger instances than Method I.
  3. Effective MILP: Similar to the first method, this approach limits the MILP to a reduced node set, based on Theorem 1 which states that, for positive demand across nodes, the solution of EVCSPP always includes at least one node from a specific neighborhood. This method augments computational efficiency without sacrificing optimality in generalized cases.
  4. Chemical Reaction Optimization (CRO): A metaheuristic technique, CRO simulates molecular reactions to explore the solution space. It is adaptable and can circumvent some limitations of deterministic methods, offering robust solutions rapidly albeit probabilistically.

Implications and Future Developments

The implications of this research are vast within smart city initiatives and environmental sustainability strategies. The consideration of EV range, capacity, and convenience aligns with real-world constraints, offering planners actionable insights into infrastructure development.

Practically, this research provides a foundation to optimize charging station placement, potentially guiding public policy and investment in urban infrastructure. The results suggest methods like the effective MILP and CRO are suitable for handling varying problem scales and objectives, paving the way for adaptive algorithmic approaches that balance between accuracy and computational feasibility.

Theoretically, the insights derived from the complexity and solution analysis of EVCSPP can extend to other infrastructure and network design problems. Future research may explore extensions of this model that incorporate dynamic elements of urban ecosystems, including real-time traffic data, evolving EV technology standards, and multi-modal transportation networks.

In conclusion, this paper contributes critical methodologies and frameworks enhancing the scalability and practicality of smart transportation infrastructure—a fundamental element in the advancement toward sustainable urban environments. The innovative solutions proposed offer valuable tools for addressing longstanding challenges in urban planning, embodying the complexities at the intersection of technology and logistics.