Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
10 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
12 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Noisy Sparse Subspace Clustering (1309.1233v2)

Published 5 Sep 2013 in stat.ML

Abstract: This paper considers the problem of subspace clustering under noise. Specifically, we study the behavior of Sparse Subspace Clustering (SSC) when either adversarial or random noise is added to the unlabelled input data points, which are assumed to be in a union of low-dimensional subspaces. We show that a modified version of SSC is \emph{provably effective} in correctly identifying the underlying subspaces, even with noisy data. This extends theoretical guarantee of this algorithm to more practical settings and provides justification to the success of SSC in a class of real applications.

Citations (199)

Summary

  • The paper advances Sparse Subspace Clustering by modifying SSC with LASSO optimization to robustly cluster noisy data in both deterministic and randomized settings.
  • It establishes theoretical noise thresholds based on geometric properties, ensuring the subspace detection property is maintained under bounded noise.
  • Extensive simulations confirm that the enhanced SSC method performs effectively in real-world applications like motion segmentation and facial recognition.

Insights from "Noisy Sparse Subspace Clustering" by Wang and Xu

The paper "Noisy Sparse Subspace Clustering" by Yu-Xiang Wang and Huan Xu addresses the challenge of subspace clustering in the presence of noise, extending the theoretical understanding of Sparse Subspace Clustering (SSC) beyond the previously studied noiseless conditions. The authors investigate both adversarial and random noise disruptions, reinforcing SSC's effectiveness in more realistic data scenarios where such disruptions are inevitable.

Problem Background

Subspace clustering is applicable across various domains, including motion segmentation, facial recognition, social network analysis, and collaborative filtering. The core premise is modeling high-dimensional data as unions of low-dimensional subspaces, enabling the identification of these underlying subspaces from unsegmented data. Traditional algorithms like LRR and SSC proved effective, but their robustness under noise remained inadequately theorized until this paper.

Methodological Advances

Wang and Xu present a modified SSC approach utilizing LASSO optimization, which inherently incorporates a noise-handling mechanism through an added penalization term. This approach attempts to balance between a sparse representation of data points and their representational error due to noise perturbations. The problem is mathematically framed using convex optimization, making it computationally feasible for large datasets.

Theoretical Developments

Central to the paper's theoretical contributions is the analysis of subspace clustering performance under both deterministic and randomized noise models. The authors establish conditions under which the LASSO-SSC still satisfies the subspace detection property, ensuring that noisy data points are clustered correctly into their respective subspaces. Remarkably, these results extend significantly previous analysis bounding the noise level that SSC can tolerate.

  1. Deterministic Model: The paper shows that for a deterministic noise model, LASSO-SSC holds as long as the noise magnitude is bounded by the geometric properties of the data, specifically the difference between the inradius and incoherence of the data points (r and mu, respectively).
  2. Random Noise Models: The research extends into randomized environments, where a probabilistic analysis shows that SSC can tolerate higher noise levels under various settings:
    • For deterministic data with random noise, the permissible noise level relates inversely to the dimensionality of subspaces.
    • Under the semi-random model (randomly drawn subspaces), similar results support SSC capability when noise overtakes signal slightly in measurement.
    • Fully random models demonstrate SSC’s resilience when both subspaces and sampling points are drawn from uniform distributions.

Numerical Simulations and Results

The theoretical implications were supported by extensive numerical experiments, which depict how parameters like subspace dimensionality and number interact with noise levels to affect clustering robustness. These applications align with real-world scenarios, demonstrating that the adjusted SSC can operate effectively amidst realistic noise assumptions.

Implications and Future Directions

The advancements made in this paper significantly broaden the application of SSC to noisier datasets, making SSC a more robust tool for unsupervised learning across numerous fields where clean data is a rarity. Future explorations could deepen these insights by examining non-ideal noise models such as outliers or missing data. Moreover, addressing the connectivity of clusters generated by SSC remains an exciting theoretical challenge, with practical implications for ensuring consistency in cluster quality across various domains.

Overall, this research not only solidifies the theoretical underpinnings of SSC but also provides practical guidelines for handling noisy data, making it an indispensable reference for practitioners and researchers working with complex datasets.