Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
8 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing for High-Dimensional Regression (1306.3171v2)

Published 13 Jun 2013 in stat.ME, cs.IT, cs.LG, and math.IT

Abstract: Fitting high-dimensional statistical models often requires the use of non-linear parameter estimation procedures. As a consequence, it is generally impossible to obtain an exact characterization of the probability distribution of the parameter estimates. This in turn implies that it is extremely challenging to quantify the \emph{uncertainty} associated with a certain parameter estimate. Concretely, no commonly accepted procedure exists for computing classical measures of uncertainty and statistical significance as confidence intervals or $p$-values for these models. We consider here high-dimensional linear regression problem, and propose an efficient algorithm for constructing confidence intervals and $p$-values. The resulting confidence intervals have nearly optimal size. When testing for the null hypothesis that a certain parameter is vanishing, our method has nearly optimal power. Our approach is based on constructing a `de-biased' version of regularized M-estimators. The new construction improves over recent work in the field in that it does not assume a special structure on the design matrix. We test our method on synthetic data and a high-throughput genomic data set about riboflavin production rate.

Citations (742)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel de-biasing algorithm that constructs nearly optimal confidence intervals and hypothesis tests in high-dimensional regression without imposing special design assumptions.
  • The paper develops a de-biased estimator by adjusting the LASSO estimator with a corrective term, ensuring an approximately Gaussian distribution for valid inference.
  • The paper validates its methodology through numerical experiments on both synthetic and real data, achieving near-optimal testing power in applications like genomics and signal processing.

Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing for High-Dimensional Regression

The paper "Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing for High-Dimensional Regression" by Adel Javanmard and Andrea Montanari addresses an important challenge in the field of high-dimensional statistics, namely, the construction of confidence intervals and hypothesis tests for regression parameters when the number of parameters p exceeds the number of observations n. High-dimensional statistical models frequently arise in modern applications such as signal processing and genomics, where standard inference procedures are often inadequate due to their reliance on asymptotic properties that fail when p > n.

Main Contributions

The authors propose an efficient algorithm to construct confidence intervals and compute pp-values for a broad class of high-dimensional regression problems. Specifically, they develop a procedure that constructs a 'de-biased' version of regularized M-estimators to mitigate the biases inherent in these estimators when applied to high-dimensional data. Key contributions include:

  1. Algorithm Development: The paper introduces an algorithm that guarantees nearly optimal confidence interval sizes and hypothesis testing power without imposing special structural assumptions on the design matrix. This aspect significantly broadens the applicability of the method.
  2. Theoretical Foundations: The authors establish rigorous theoretical guarantees for their method. They demonstrate that their de-biased estimator is approximately Gaussian with known mean and covariance, thereby facilitating the construction of confidence intervals and hypothesis tests analogous to those in classical statistics.
  3. Numerical Validation: The method's performance is validated using both synthetic and real datasets, showcasing its practical utility in complex high-dimensional settings.

De-Biased Estimator

To address the bias of existing estimators such as the LASSO, the authors introduce a de-biasing technique. The core idea is to adjust the LASSO estimator by adding a term proportional to a subgradient of the 1\ell_1 penalty. Formally, the de-biased estimator is defined as:

θ^u=θ^n+1nMXT(YXθ^n)\hat{\theta}^u = \hat{\theta}^n + \frac{1}{n} M X^T (Y - X \hat{\theta}^n)

Here, θ^n\hat{\theta}^n is the LASSO estimator, and MM is a matrix designed to “de-correlate” the columns of the design matrix XX.

Theoretical Results

The authors provide several key theoretical results:

  1. Bias and Variance Analysis: They derive bounds on the bias and variance of the de-biased estimator. The bias term is shown to be negligible when the sparsity s0s_0 satisfies s0=o(n/logp)s_0 = o(\sqrt{n}/\log p).
  2. Distributional Properties: It is established that the de-biased estimator is approximately Gaussian, with mean equal to the true parameter θ0\theta_0 and covariance matrix σ2(MMT)/n\sigma^2 (M M^T)/n. This result is crucial for the construction of confidence intervals and hypothesis tests.
  3. Optimality: The authors argue that under certain conditions, their method achieves near-optimal power for hypothesis testing, with asymptotic efficiency bounded away from zero.

Practical Implications

The practical implications of this work are manifold:

  1. General Applicability: The method is applicable to a broad range of problems without special assumptions on the design matrix, making it a versatile tool for high-dimensional data analysis.
  2. Streamlined Inference: By providing efficient and theoretically sound procedures for constructing confidence intervals and conducting hypothesis tests, this work facilitates more reliable and interpretable statistical inference in high-dimensional settings.
  3. Future Directions: The algorithm's robustness to various design matrices and noise distributions suggests potential extensions to other high-dimensional estimation problems beyond linear regression. Future work could explore these extensions to generalized linear models and other machine learning tasks.

Conclusion

Javanmard and Montanari's paper makes significant strides in the field of high-dimensional statistics by addressing the challenges of parameter inference in settings where traditional methods falter. Through their innovative de-biasing approach and rigorous theoretical analysis, they provide tools that enhance the reliability and accuracy of statistical inference in complex, high-dimensional environments. The implications for practical applications and future research directions are substantial and promise to stimulate further advancements in high-dimensional data analysis.