Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Graphical Models for Preference and Utility (1302.4928v1)

Published 20 Feb 2013 in cs.AI

Abstract: Probabilistic independence can dramatically simplify the task of eliciting, representing, and computing with probabilities in large domains. A key technique in achieving these benefits is the idea of graphical modeling. We survey existing notions of independence for utility functions in a multi-attribute space, and suggest that these can be used to achieve similar advantages. Our new results concern conditional additive independence, which we show always has a perfect representation as separation in an undirected graph (a Markov network). Conditional additive independencies entail a particular functional for the utility function that is analogous to a product decomposition of a probability function, and confers analogous benefits. This functional form has been utilized in the Bayesian network and influence diagram literature, but generally without an explanation in terms of independence. The functional form yields a decomposition of the utility function that can greatly speed up expected utility calculations, particularly when the utility graph has a similar topology to the probabilistic network being used.

Citations (247)

Summary

  • The paper introduces CA-independence to decompose utility functions, enabling more efficient computation in multi-attribute domains.
  • It employs undirected graphs to represent conditional independence, aligning utility decomposition with established probabilistic techniques.
  • The study demonstrates that graphical models can reduce computational complexity and streamline utility elicitation in decision-theoretic AI.

Overview of "Graphical Models for Preference and Utility" by Bacchus and Grove

Bacchus and Grove address the intersection of graphical models and utility theory in their paper on exploiting conditional independence structures for utility elicitation and computation. The work explores the challenge of effectively representing and reasoning about utilities in multi-attribute domains by drawing parallels with probabilistic methods, particularly graphical models like Bayesian networks. The authors focus on the conditional additive independence (CA-independence) and its representation via undirected graphs, or Markov networks, which facilitate reduced computational complexity in utility functions similarly to the role of probabilistic independence in easing probability calculations.

Conditional Additive Independence and Graphical Models

The paper emphasizes that the notion of independence, central to probabilistic models, can also be beneficial when applied to utility functions. Conditional additive independence (CA-independence) enables the decomposition of utility functions into forms that are computationally manageable. Specifically, CA-independence represents utility functions with fewer arguments, thus facilitating utility elicitation, storage, and computation across large domains.

The significant outcome of this research is that each utility function possesses a "perfect CA-independence map," meaning it could be accurately depicted in a graph such that the graph's separation corresponds with CA-independence. This implies that the utility function's requisite decomposition can be directly inferred from the graphical representation, given that the graph's structure aligns with visible Markovian properties.

Computational Implications

Graphical models provide the double advantage of reducing complexity through both representational compactness and computational tractability. When utility functions are decomposed over sets of variables corresponding to maximal cliques in a graphical model, computing expected utilities becomes less resource-intensive. Notably, decomposable utility structures align with pre-existing probabilistic models, accelerating and simplifying expected utility calculations. This alignment suggests computational optimizations, especially when both utility functions and probabilistic models share similar topological features.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The theoretical contribution here lies in adapting graphical models—traditionally used for probabilities—to utility calculations, thus enriching decision theory within artificial intelligence frameworks. This approach offers intriguing prospects for multi-objective decision-making, moving towards a more structured representation of utilities. The paper highlights the potential benefits of further exploring other forms of utility independence, which may have applications in AI systems dealing with complex decision-making processes.

Directions for Future Research

Future investigations could explore the applicability of graphical models for different types of utility independence beyond CA-independence. Additional research might involve refining utility decompositions and analyzing their practical impacts on computational efficiency in AI systems. Furthermore, given their parallel to Bayesian networks, efforts to integrate utility-based graphical models with standard probabilistic inference methods could unlock new dimensions in decision-theoretic AI planning.

In conclusion, the work of Bacchus and Grove presents a substantial exploration into extending graphical models' utility beyond traditional probabilistic contexts. It opens pathways for subsequent developments in AI that leverage these insights to address sophisticated preference and decision-making problems.