Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Solving POMDPs by Searching the Space of Finite Policies (1301.6720v1)

Published 23 Jan 2013 in cs.AI

Abstract: Solving partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) is highly intractable in general, at least in part because the optimal policy may be infinitely large. In this paper, we explore the problem of finding the optimal policy from a restricted set of policies, represented as finite state automata of a given size. This problem is also intractable, but we show that the complexity can be greatly reduced when the POMDP and/or policy are further constrained. We demonstrate good empirical results with a branch-and-bound method for finding globally optimal deterministic policies, and a gradient-ascent method for finding locally optimal stochastic policies.

Citations (208)

Summary

  • The paper reduces POMDP complexity by confining the search to finite policy graphs, mitigating the challenge of infinite policy spaces.
  • It develops two algorithms—a branch-and-bound method for deterministic policies and a gradient-ascent method for stochastic policies—with proven effectiveness.
  • Empirical tests on tasks like maze navigation and load/unload highlight near-linear scalability and practical utility in decision-making under uncertainty.

Solving POMDPs by Searching the Space of Finite Policies

The paper "Solving POMDPs by Searching the Space of Finite Policies" authored by Nicolas Meuleau, Kee-Eung Kim, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, and Anthony R. Cassandra addresses the significant computational challenges posed by partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs). Recognizing the inherent difficulty due to the potentially infinite policy size, the authors propose a focus on a subset of policies representable as finite state automata, or "policy graphs," of a given size. This approach seeks to reduce the complexity inherent in solving POMDPs by constraining the problem space to a feasible domain.

Key Contributions

  • Reduction of Complexity: The authors present methods to narrow down the search for optimal policies within a constrained space of finite policy graphs, rendering the problem more tractable than traditional POMDP solutions. This is significant as the state-action space grows exponentially due to partial observability.
  • Development of Algorithms: Two approaches are introduced:
    • A branch-and-bound method for finding optimal deterministic policies.
    • A gradient-ascent method for searching for optimal stochastic policies.

The branch-and-bound technique, notably, provides a global search mechanism, ensuring the exploration of the policy space is exhaustive within the stipulated bounds. The gradient-ascent method is pivotal in optimizing policies locally by leveraging differentiability and continuity in policy evaluation.

Theoretical Underpinnings and Complexity

The paper robustly establishes that finding optimal deterministic finite policy graphs is an NP-hard problem. This assertion aligns with known complexity results for related optimal policy determination tasks in MDPs and POMDPs. The authors ingeniously employ the cross-product of the POMDP and the policy graph, effectively transforming the problem into an MDP on the product space, thus facilitating the computation of policy values via BeLLMan equations.

Empirical Results and Utility

Empirical validation is conducted using structured problems like load/unload and maze navigation tasks. These experiments underscore the applicability of the proposed methods to larger and more structured POMDPs compared to traditional approaches that are severely limited by computational constraints.

  • Computational Feasibility: Solutions were derived for mazes with close to 1000 states, demonstrating a substantial leap over classical solution methods. Notably, the paper's results suggest near-linear scalability with problem size, a striking achievement in the field of POMDPs.

Implications and Future Prospects

The presented algorithms offer substantial computational leverage by exploiting both the inherent structure of POMDPs and the imposed structure on policy graphs. In scenarios where neither aspect alone yields sufficient efficiency, further constraining the policy space becomes a viable strategy.

The implications are twofold:

  • Practical: Such methods have the potential to be adapted across various domains where decision making under uncertainty and partial observability is paramount, such as robotics and autonomous systems.
  • Theoretical: The approaches invite further exploration into the use of structured policies and constraints to efficiently approximate solutions where exact computation is infeasible.

Future work may delve into refining structural constraints or pursuing hybrid models that merge these deterministic and stochastic approaches. Additionally, the exploration might include adaptive mechanisms that refine policy graph structures dynamically during operation, enhancing real-time decision-making capabilities in evolving environments.

In conclusion, the paper provides a comprehensive and systematic approach to address the formidable challenges in solving POMDPs using finite policy graphs, offering both theoretical insights and practical solutions pivotal for advancing research in decision-making systems under uncertainty.