Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Wireless Information and Power Transfer: Architecture Design and Rate-Energy Tradeoff (1205.0618v3)

Published 3 May 2012 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: Simultaneous information and power transfer over the wireless channels potentially offers great convenience to mobile users. Yet practical receiver designs impose technical constraints on its hardware realization, as practical circuits for harvesting energy from radio signals are not yet able to decode the carried information directly. To make theoretical progress, we propose a general receiver operation, namely, dynamic power splitting (DPS), which splits the received signal with adjustable power ratio for energy harvesting and information decoding, separately. Three special cases of DPS, namely, time switching (TS), static power splitting (SPS) and on-off power splitting (OPS) are investigated. The TS and SPS schemes can be treated as special cases of OPS. Moreover, we propose two types of practical receiver architectures, namely, separated versus integrated information and energy receivers. The integrated receiver integrates the front-end components of the separated receiver, thus achieving a smaller form factor. The rate-energy tradeoff for the two architectures are characterized by a so-called rate-energy (R-E) region. The optimal transmission strategy is derived to achieve different rate-energy tradeoffs. With receiver circuit power consumption taken into account, it is shown that the OPS scheme is optimal for both receivers. For the ideal case when the receiver circuit does not consume power, the SPS scheme is optimal for both receivers. In addition, we study the performance for the two types of receivers under a realistic system setup that employs practical modulation. Our results provide useful insights to the optimal practical receiver design for simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT).

Citations (1,814)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a dynamic power splitting (DPS) scheme that enables simultaneous wireless information and power transfer through innovative receiver architectures.
  • It analyzes variants like time switching, static, and on-off splitting while comparing separated and integrated receiver designs under practical conditions.
  • The study finds SPS optimal when receiver circuit consumption is negligible and OPS superior when power consumption is significant, guiding efficient SWIPT system designs.

Wireless Information and Power Transfer: Architecture Design and Rate-Energy Tradeoff

The paper "Wireless Information and Power Transfer: Architecture Design and Rate-Energy Tradeoff" by Xun Zhou, Rui Zhang, and Chin Keong Ho addresses the problem of simultaneously delivering data and energy over wireless channels. As wireless devices evolve, there is a growing need for solutions that can deliver both information and power to these devices. This paper explores the challenges and potential solutions associated with designing receivers capable of both processes, collectively termed Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer (SWIPT).

Contributions and Key Findings

  1. Dynamic Power Splitting (DPS): The paper proposes a general receiver operation known as Dynamic Power Splitting (DPS), which divides the received signal into two streams using an adjustable power ratio: one stream for energy harvesting and the other for information decoding.
  2. Special Cases of DPS:

Three variants of DPS are explored: - Time Switching (TS): The receiver switches between energy harvesting and information decoding over time. - Static Power Splitting (SPS): A fixed fraction of the power is used for harvesting energy while the remainder is used for decoding information. - On-Off Power Splitting (OPS): A hybrid approach where the signal is split for energy harvesting at certain times and for information decoding at others.

  1. Receiver Architectures:

Two practical receiver architectures utilizing DPS are proposed: - Separated Receiver: Employs separate paths for energy harvesting and information decoding after splitting the signal in the RF domain. - Integrated Receiver: Integrates the energy harvesting and information decoding circuits, thereby reducing form factor and potentially improving performance.

  1. Rate-Energy (R-E) Region: The achievable rate-energy tradeoff is characterized by the R-E region, which models the balance between information rate and harvested energy. Optimal transmission strategies are derived to achieve various tradeoffs.
  2. Optimal Schemes:
    • For the separated receiver, it is shown that the SPS scheme is optimal when the receiver circuit power consumption is negligible.
    • For the scenario where the receiver circuit consumes power, the OPS scheme is found to be optimal.
  3. Practical Performance: The paper extends to comparing the practical modulation performance for both types of receivers, assuming realistic system setups and modulation schemes.

Implications and Future Directions

This research provides critical insights into the design and optimization of practical receiver architecture for SWIPT systems. Practically, achieving a balance between data rates and harvested power is pivotal for developing efficient and sustainable wireless networks, especially in scenarios where devices have stringent energy constraints, such as IoT applications and wireless sensor networks.

Practical Implications:

  • Device Efficiency: The integrated receiver's smaller form factor and higher practical efficiency make it especially well-suited for compact and resource-constrained devices.
  • System Design: The findings suggest that taking into account the power consumption of receiver circuits is crucial for accurate system design and optimization.
  • Rate Maximization: For systems targeting zero-net-energy consumption, the integrated receiver provides superior rates at small transmission distances.

Theoretical Implications:

  • Optimization Algorithms: Future research can further refine the optimization algorithms for rate-energy tradeoff, especially in systems with varying environmental interference.
  • Channel Capacity: Investigation into achieving the channel capacity under different noise conditions and modulation schemes can push the boundaries of SWIPT efficiency.

Speculative Directions in AI:

The frameworks and algorithms developed for optimizing the rate-energy tradeoff in SWIPT systems can be adapted for use in AI-driven communication networks. AI algorithms can dynamically adjust power-splitting ratios and modulation schemes based on real-time data, further enhancing the efficiency of wireless communication systems.

Conclusion

The paper makes significant strides in addressing the dual needs of wireless information and power transfer. The proposed DPS scheme and novel receiver architectures offer a pathway to more efficient and practical SWIPT systems. By identifying optimal strategies for different scenarios, this research paves the way for future advancements in sustainable and high-performance wireless networks.