Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Compact continuum source-finding for next generation radio surveys (1202.4500v1)

Published 21 Feb 2012 in astro-ph.IM

Abstract: We present a detailed analysis of four of the most widely used radio source finding packages in radio astronomy, and a program being developed for the Australian Square Kilometer Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) telescope. The four packages; SExtractor, SFind, IMSAD and Selavy are shown to produce source catalogues with high completeness and reliability. In this paper we analyse the small fraction (~1%) of cases in which these packages do not perform well. This small fraction of sources will be of concern for the next generation of radio surveys which will produce many thousands of sources on a daily basis, in particular for blind radio transients surveys. From our analysis we identify the ways in which the underlying source finding algorithms fail. We demonstrate a new source finding algorithm Aegean, based on the application of a Laplacian kernel, which can avoid these problems and can produce complete and reliable source catalogues for the next generation of radio surveys.

Citations (165)

Summary

Compact Continuum Source-Finding for Next Generation Radio Surveys: A Critical Review

The paper "Compact Continuum Source-Finding for Next Generation Radio Surveys" by Hancock et al. addresses the pivotal aspect of source finding in the context of upcoming large-scale radio astronomical surveys. The paper meticulously evaluates existing source-finding packages and proposes a novel algorithm tailored to overcome the observed limitations in these packages.

The authors' work takes into account the rapid generation of vast datasets through instruments such as the Australian Square Kilometer Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) and other forthcoming telescopes. The paper spotlights four widely-implemented source-finding methodologies: SExtractor, , , and Selavy, and also contributes a newly developed algorithm referred to as .

Performance Evaluation of Existing Algorithms

The paper thoroughly examines the capabilities and shortcomings of the prevalent source-finding tools through a comparative analysis focusing on two key metrics: completeness and reliability. Completeness refers to the fraction of real sources successfully identified by an algorithm, whereas reliability pertains to the correctness of the identified sources. These metrics were scrutinized using simulated data, which enabled precise control over the source properties and subsequent detailed evaluation of the algorithms.

One significant revelation is that while existing algorithms like SExtractor and Selavy are adept at identifying isolated sources, they exhibit deficiencies in processing regions with closely situated, multiple sources or when signal-to-noise ratios are borderline. This is particularly problematic in high-cadence, blind surveys for radio transients, where incomplete catalogues could lead to missing critical transient phenomena.

Introduction of

Hancock et al. introduce an innovative approach with their algorithm, . Employing a Laplacian-of-Gaussian method, effectively identifies and distinguishes overlapping sources by analyzing curvature maps—curvature being a mathematical representation of the rate of change of orientation. Through this technique, it offers a heightened accuracy in determining the number of source components within complex pixel islands, thus improving both completeness and reliability.

Numerical Outcomes and Algorithmic Insights

The empirical evidence gathered from simulations suggests that , with its novel algorithmic architecture, surpasses traditional source finders under numerous conditions. Its design allows for superior handling of pixel islands that involve multiple sources, a common feature in densely packed regions of astronomical interest. Notably, enhances the completeness of detected sources to above 93% at the 5σ threshold, without significantly sacrificing reliability, which remains comparably robust.

This paper contributes substantial insights into the nature of algorithmic failures and offers practical solutions to rectify them. The incremental improvement demonstrated by even slight augmentations in completeness and reliability underscores the necessity for continuous refinement of source-finding algorithms, especially in preparation for the sizeable datasets expected from next-generation surveys.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of these findings are multifaceted. Practically, improved source finding could lead to more robust catalogues, facilitating precise astronomical studies ranging from galactic evolution analyses to transient event characterizations. Theoretically, the success of curvature-based approaches motivates further exploration and potential adaptation to other domains within AI and data processing frameworks.

Looking forward, the continued development and testing of algorithms like are crucial for preparing the infrastructure needed for upcoming large-scale astronomical surveys. These improvements can substantially reduce manual adjustment requirements, expediting the data preparation phase and thereby enhancing the overall scientific return of such endeavours.

In conclusion, Hancock et al.'s paper exemplifies a significant contribution to radio astronomy's methodological advancements through a thoughtful critique of current techniques and the proposal of a promising alternative that advances the field toward more automatic, complete, and reliable source cataloguing.