Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
96 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
51 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
36 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
34 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
96 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
91 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
466 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
148 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Euclid's theorem on the infinitude of primes: a historical survey of its proofs (300 B.C.--2022) and another new proof (1202.3670v4)

Published 16 Feb 2012 in math.HO and math.NT

Abstract: {\bf In the fourth extended version of this article, we provide a comprehensive historical survey of 200 different proofs of famous Euclid's theorem on the infinitude of prime numbers (300 {\small B.C.}--2022)}. The author is trying to collect almost all the known proofs on infinitude of primes, including some proofs that can be easily obtained as consequences of some known problems or divisibility properties. Furthermore, here are listed numerous elementary proofs of the infinitude of primes in different arithmetic progressions. All the references concerning the proofs of Euclid's theorem that use similar methods and ideas are exposed subsequently. Namely, presented proofs are divided into the first five subsections of Section 2 in dependence of the methods that are used in them. 14 proofs which are proved from 2012 to 2017 are given in Subsection 2.9, and 18 recent proofs from 2018 to 2022 are presented in Subsection 2.10. In Section 3, we mainly survey elementary proofs of the infinitude of primes in different arithmetic progressions. Presented proofs are special cases of Dirichlet's theorem. In Section 4, we give a new simple ''Euclidean's proof'' of the infinitude of primes.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)