Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

When is there a representer theorem? Vector versus matrix regularizers (0809.1590v1)

Published 9 Sep 2008 in cs.LG

Abstract: We consider a general class of regularization methods which learn a vector of parameters on the basis of linear measurements. It is well known that if the regularizer is a nondecreasing function of the inner product then the learned vector is a linear combination of the input data. This result, known as the {\em representer theorem}, is at the basis of kernel-based methods in machine learning. In this paper, we prove the necessity of the above condition, thereby completing the characterization of kernel methods based on regularization. We further extend our analysis to regularization methods which learn a matrix, a problem which is motivated by the application to multi-task learning. In this context, we study a more general representer theorem, which holds for a larger class of regularizers. We provide a necessary and sufficient condition for these class of matrix regularizers and highlight them with some concrete examples of practical importance. Our analysis uses basic principles from matrix theory, especially the useful notion of matrix nondecreasing function.

Citations (171)

Summary

  • The paper provides necessary and sufficient conditions for the representer theorem in both vector and matrix regularization settings.
  • It defines a general representer theorem for matrix regularizers, extending its application to multi-task learning problems involving matrix structures.
  • The work offers a framework useful for multi-task learning, showing how matrix regularizers like the trace norm can favor low-rank solutions capturing task interdependencies.

On Regularization in Hilbert Spaces and its Matrix Extensions

The paper "Vector versus matrix regularizers" by Andreas Argyriou, Charles A. Micchelli, and Massimiliano Pontil presents a detailed examination of regularization methods within the context of learning problems dealing with both vectors and matrices. This work extends the understanding of the representer theorem beyond its conventional vector application to address multi-task learning challenges that inherently involve matrix structures.

Regularization in Hilbert Spaces

Central to the paper is the exploration of regularization in the context of Hilbert spaces, which historically emerges as a robust methodology for learning from examples across statistics, optimal estimation, and machine learning. The authors revisit the well-established representer theorem, which suggests solutions to regularization problems can be precisely represented as linear combinations of input data vectors. Previous studies recognized the sufficiency of constructing regularizers as nondecreasing functions of the inner product to guarantee the representer theorem's applicability. The authors here prove that this condition is not only sufficient but also necessary, thus completing the characterization of such kernel-based methods.

Extension to Matrix Learning Problems

The authors innovate by extending regularization principles to matrix learning problems, with relevant applications in multi-task learning—a rapidly evolving domain in machine learning. Here, they confront the matrix regularization challenge by defining a more general representer theorem suitable for matrix regularizers. The distinguishing feature of these matrix problems lies in treating multiple tasks together within a single matrix structure, as opposed to separate vectors. They elucidate a necessary and sufficient condition for the general representer theorem, highlighting the nature of matrix nondecreasing functions.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

This research's implications are vast—both practically and theoretically. Theoretically, it advances the understanding of regularization by generalizing the representer theorem to a multifaceted matrix landscape. Practically, it provides a framework that is instrumental for multi-task learning applications, where tasks are interrelated and can benefit from shared information. The work presents specific examples, such as the trace norm, and addresses optimization problems where regularizers ensure interdependencies amongst tasks, favoring matrix solutions of low rank.

Future Directions

The exploration initiated by this paper sets the stage for several future research avenues. For instance, further paper could investigate more specific instances of matrix regularizers, delve into additional constraints affecting representer theorems, or extend these principles to operator learning between different Hilbert spaces. Additionally, understanding the broader impact of these findings in collaborative filtering and similar domains adds value not only from an academic perspective but also from practical machine learning implementations.

Overall, this paper positions itself as a comprehensive reference for regularization techniques, particularly in multi-task and matrix-based learning scenarios. It provides rigorous theoretical advancements, setting a profound background for future explorations in the field of statistical learning and model regularization.