Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Spectrum Sharing Between Cellular and Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: Transmission-Capacity Trade-Off (0808.2181v2)

Published 15 Aug 2008 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: Spectrum sharing between wireless networks improves the efficiency of spectrum usage, and thereby alleviates spectrum scarcity due to growing demands for wireless broadband access. To improve the usual underutilization of the cellular uplink spectrum, this paper studies spectrum sharing between a cellular uplink and a mobile ad hoc networks. These networks access either all frequency sub-channels or their disjoint sub-sets, called spectrum underlay and spectrum overlay, respectively. Given these spectrum sharing methods, the capacity trade-off between the coexisting networks is analyzed based on the transmission capacity of a network with Poisson distributed transmitters. This metric is defined as the maximum density of transmitters subject to an outage constraint for a given signal-to-interference ratio (SIR). Using tools from stochastic geometry, the transmission-capacity trade-off between the coexisting networks is analyzed, where both spectrum overlay and underlay as well as successive interference cancelation (SIC) are considered. In particular, for small target outage probability, the transmission capacities of the coexisting networks are proved to satisfy a linear equation, whose coefficients depend on the spectrum sharing method and whether SIC is applied. This linear equation shows that spectrum overlay is more efficient than spectrum underlay. Furthermore, this result also provides insight into the effects of different network parameters on transmission capacities, including link diversity gains, transmission distances, and the base station density. In particular, SIC is shown to increase transmission capacities of both coexisting networks by a linear factor, which depends on the interference-power threshold for qualifying canceled interferers.

Citations (244)

Summary

  • The paper analyzes spectrum sharing's transmission-capacity trade-offs between cellular and mobile ad hoc networks using stochastic geometry and evaluating overlay and underlay methods.
  • The study identifies a linear trade-off between network transmission capacities and shows that spectrum overlay generally offers a larger capacity region than underlay.
  • Applying successive interference cancellation significantly boosts transmission capacities, and optimizing the transmission power ratio can enhance the performance of spectrum underlay.

Spectrum Sharing Between Cellular and Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: Transmission-Capacity Trade-Off

The paper under discussion explores the intricacies of spectrum sharing between cellular networks and mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) by examining their transmission-capacity trade-offs. The authors focus primarily on optimizing spectrum utilization on the cellular uplink, which is often underutilized in existing frequency-division duplex (FDD) systems. The paper leverages stochastic geometry, specifically Poisson distributed transmitters, to analyze the trade-offs between two spectrum sharing methods: spectrum overlay and spectrum underlay, in conjunction with the implementation of successive interference cancellation (SIC).

Analysis of Spectrum Sharing Methods

In spectrum overlay, the available spectrum is partitioned into disjoint subsets that each network uses exclusively. This method reduces potential interference but requires continual monitoring and adaptation to the traffic dynamics. In contrast, spectrum underlay allows both networks to access the full spectrum, which can lead to increased interference but is simpler in terms of initial coordination requirements. The paper quantifies the performance of these sharing methods by delineating the capacity-region boundaries, demonstrating that spectrum overlay tends to outperform underlay because of its ability to better manage interference between the coexisting networks.

Transmission Capacity and Signal-to-Interference Ratio Considerations

Transmission capacity is a key metric evaluated in this work. The authors define it as the maximum density of transmitters while maintaining a target signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) for a specified outage probability. They demonstrate the existence of a linear trade-off between the transmission capacities of the two coexisting networks under small target outage probabilities. Notably, the research shows that the capacity region for spectrum underlay is constrained compared to that of overlay, but can be optimized by adjusting the transmission power ratio between the networks.

Impact of Network Parameters and Successive Interference Cancellation

The paper also investigates the influence of various network parameters on transmission capacities. It highlights that increasing the base station density, reducing the transmission distance in ad hoc networks, and enhancing spatial diversity gains can lead to higher transmission capacities. Moreover, the application of SIC is pivotal as it significantly bolsters capacities by reducing interference, which depends on setting appropriate interference-power thresholds.

Simulation and Theoretical Alignment

Numerical simulations corroborate the analytical bounds and demonstrate that the theoretical models hold even in non-asymptotic regimes, affirming the practical utility of the paper's findings. The accuracy of the analytical bounds on outage probabilities and the effectiveness of the SIC in optimizing spectrum use are validated through extensive simulations.

Implications and Future Directions

The findings of this paper carry substantial implications for the design and development of next-generation broadband wireless networks, where efficient spectrum utilization is crucial. This work lays the groundwork for further investigations into cognitive radio techniques, accommodating non-homogeneous network architectures, and refining spectrum sharing strategies. Future research may also extend these results to more diverse network environments or develop algorithms for real-time spectrum sharing adjustments.

In conclusion, the paper makes significant strides in understanding and modeling the transmission-capacity trade-offs inherent in spectrum sharing between cellular networks and MANETs, offering valuable insights and quantifiable strategies to enhance wireless communication systems.