Diffusion-Based Model Recipe

• Diffusion-based model recipes are systematic methods that convert simple Gaussian distributions into complex, data-driven targets using sequential stochastic processes.
• They bridge microscopic and macroscopic scales by employing frameworks like the MDE for discrete particle dynamics and SDEs for continuum modeling.
• They also power high-dimensional generative tasks, enabling applications from image synthesis to molecular generation through tailored reverse processes.

A diffusion-based model describes the transformation of a simple initial probability distribution (often a Gaussian) into a complex, data-driven target distribution via a sequence of stochastic transformations. This sequence, known as a diffusion process, underpins both the physical modeling of microscopic fluctuations and the generative synthesis of high-dimensional data—such as images, molecular structures, or patterns in materials and biological systems. The recipe for constructing, training, and applying diffusion-based models varies according to the scale and domain, ranging from microscopic particle-resolved schemes to macroscopic, continuous stochastic differential equations (SDEs), but all approaches share foundational probabilistic and algorithmic principles.

---

1. Microscopic and Mesoscopic Model Construction

Diffusion-based model recipes at the microscopic and mesoscopic scale are designed to faithfully capture discrete particle fluctuations and mass conservation, especially in regimes where particle counts per computational cell are small and statistical noise plays a significant role. Notably, the Multinomial Diffusion Equation (MDE) formulates diffusion as an integer microdynamics on a spatial lattice:

• MDE framework: At each timestep, each voxel (cell) with $N_i^t$ particles allows particles to jump left, right, or stay, with multinomially determined counts:

$$P[L_i^t, R_i^t] = \frac{N_i^t!}{L_i^t! \, R_i^t! \, (N_i^t - L_i^t - R_i^t)!} \, \kappa^{L_i^t} \, \kappa^{R_i^t} \, (1-2\kappa)^{N_i^t - L_i^t - R_i^t}$$

and the update rule is

$$N_i^{t+\Delta t} = N_i^t + L_{i+1}^t - R_i^t - L_i^t + R_{i-1}^t$$

where $\kappa$ is related to the physical diffusion constant by $\kappa = D \Delta t / (\Delta x)^2$.

• Advantages:
  • Exactly preserves particle number and enforces non-negativity; cannot yield unphysical negative densities.
  • Correctly captures intrinsic number fluctuations, crucial at low particle densities.
  • Reduces to classical stochastic diffusion (SDE) in the limit $N \to \infty$, with equations converging to

  $$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = D \frac{\partial^2 \rho}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \sqrt{2 D \rho(x, t)} \, \xi(x, t)$$

  where $\xi(x, t)$ is Gaussian noise.

• Comparison and applicability: At high densities, continuum SDE methods are efficient and accurate; at low densities, MDE-type models or fully resolved Langevin dynamics are essential to avoid spurious fluctuations or unphysical results.

• Hybrid modeling: Further efficiency is achieved by patching together regions described by PDE/SDE (macroscopic) and compartment-based stochastic models (mesoscopic), using interface-coupling recipes such as the pseudo-compartment method. In this method, a pseudo-compartment acts as a bridge, allowing individual particles (or mass packets) to be probabilistically or deterministically exchanged between regimes, with fluxes and stochastic transitions computed to preserve physical realism and interface consistency.

---

2. Multiscale and Advanced Continuum Extensions

Diffusion-based model recipes are extended to account for complex microstructure, multiple transport pathways, and stochastic effects:

• Double Diffusivity Models: Systems with distinct high- and low-diffusivity paths (e.g., grain boundaries, double porosity media) are modeled by coupled Fickian equations with exchange terms:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial \rho_1}{\partial t} &= D_1 \nabla^2 \rho_1 - \kappa_1 \rho_1 + \kappa_2 \rho_2 + \eta_1(\mathbf{x}, t) \ \frac{\partial \rho_2}{\partial t} &= D_2 \nabla^2 \rho_2 + \kappa_1 \rho_1 - \kappa_2 \rho_2 + \eta_2(\mathbf{x}, t) \end{aligned}$$

and, upon uncoupling, yield higher-order PDEs featuring internal length, inertia, and (pseudo-)viscous effects.

• Internal Length Gradient (ILG) and Stochastic Models: Incorporate higher derivatives and stochastic forcing to explain observed relaxation and pattern formation phenomena in nanostructured materials, reconciling deterministic continuum predictions with experimentally measured time scales (often an order of magnitude larger than deterministic ILG models alone).

• Pattern Formation: Recipes leveraging Maxwell-Stefan formulations or inferred cross-diffusion mechanisms can predict Turing patterns, reaction-diffusion instabilities, and realistic morphogenetic behavior. These approaches model mutual frictional drag between species and can be systematically inferred from spatiotemporal data using variational system inference.

---

3. Score-Based and Generative Diffusion Models

In the domain of high-dimensional data synthesis (images, molecules, audio), the diffusion-based model recipe is characterized by continuous or discrete-time stochastic processes in data space, reversed by neural generative models:

• Forward process: Progressively adds noise (typically Gaussian) via a Markov chain or SDE,

$$x_t = \sqrt{\overline{\alpha}_t} x_0 + \sqrt{1 - \overline{\alpha}_t} \epsilon, \; \epsilon \sim \mathcal{N}(0, I)$$

or in SDE form,

$dx = f(x, t) dt + g(t) d\omega$

with $f(x, t)$ and $g(t)$ tailored to enforce variance-preserving or variance-exploding regimes.

• Reverse process: Trains a neural network to approximate the reverse dynamics,

$$p_\theta(x_{t-1}|x_t) = \mathcal{N}(x_{t-1}; \mu_\theta(x_t, t), \Sigma_\theta)$$

with $\mu_\theta$ parameterized either to predict the denoised sample, the added noise ("epsilon-prediction"), or the score (gradient of log-density) at $(x_t, t)$.

• Score matching and Tweedie's formula: When the model is trained to denoise, the score function $\nabla_x \log p_t(x_t)$ is obtained via Tweedie’s formula,

$$\nabla \log f_{X_\sigma}(x) = \frac{\hat{x}_{\text{MMSE}}(x) - x}{\sigma^2}$$

which provides a theoretically grounded link between denoising and likelihood gradients.

• Sampling and scheduling: The generation trajectory is traversed via random walks or discretized Langevin dynamics, optionally decoupling training and sampling schedules for step size and noise, according to

$$x_{k+1} = x_k + \tau_k \nabla \log f_{X_{\sigma_k}}(x_k) + \sqrt{2\tau_k \mathcal{T}_k} \zeta_k$$

or, with a trained denoiser,

$$x_{k+1} = x_k + \frac{\tau_k}{\sigma_k^2} [r_\theta(x_k, \sigma_k) - x_k] + \sqrt{2\tau_k \mathcal{T}_k} \zeta_k$$

allowing flexibility for efficient, creative sampling and inverse problem solutions.

• Conditional and inverse problem recipes: Posterior conditioning enters the generative process as a gradient:

$$x_{k+1} = x_k + \tau_k \nabla \log f_{X_{\sigma_k}}(x_k) + \tau_k \nabla \log f_{Y|X_{\sigma_k}}(y | x_k) + \sqrt{2\tau_k \mathcal{T}_k} \zeta_k$$

allowing for principled, likelihood-based posterior sampling in arbitrary Bayesian inverse problems without explicit likelihood approximation.

---

4. Algorithmic Templates and Practical Considerations

A diffusion-based model recipe for generative tasks can be generally summarized as follows:

1. Forward Process Design:

   • Choose a noise schedule ($\beta_t$, or SDE parameters $f(x, t), g(t)$), matching the data and intended use (faithfulness at low noise for intricate structure, rapid diffusion for high-dimensional efficiency).
   • Decouple or co-design with reverse process for specialized applications (e.g., PSLD models operate in phase space, extending to auxiliary variables).
2. Network Parameterization and Losses:
   • Train neural denoisers or score networks with MSE loss on noise or reconstructed samples, weighted per noise level:

   $$\mathcal{L}(\theta) = \mathbb{E}_{x_0, t, \varepsilon} [ w(t) \| \epsilon_\theta(x_t, t) - \varepsilon \|^2 ]$$

• Employ appropriate normalization, skip connections, and architecture scaling with respect to current noise.

1. Sampling/Generation:

   • Use either stochastic (Langevin, random walk) or deterministic (ODE-based, consistency) updates, with step sizes and temperature schedules chosen for the best speed–quality trade-off.
   • For conditional/inverse problems, add measurement gradients directly at each step.
2. Post-Training Enhancements:
   • Apply distillation techniques to reduce the number of necessary sampling steps (e.g., progressive distillation, consistency distillation), which blend teacher–student models or compress multi-step dynamics into fewer updates.
   • Use reward-based or adversarial fine-tuning where task-specific objective functions or distribution alignment are needed.
3. Hybrid and Multimodal Extensions:
   • Apply hierarchical or mixture-based sampling for integrating prior knowledge, auxiliary variables, or multimodal inputs.
   • Use mixture approximations and data-augmented Gibbs samplers for advanced Bayesian inference where intermediate posteriors or guided diffusion are intractable by direct scoring.

---

5. Domain-Specific and Multimodal Innovations

• Voxel-based and Grand Canonical Representations: For atomic and molecular structure generation, voxel grids and continuous density fields facilitate grand canonical sampling (variable particle counts) and better long-range order reconstruction, overcoming limitations of fixed-particle-number, point-cloud models.
• Diffusion on Probability Simplex: For categorical or bounded data, mapping Ornstein-Uhlenbeck dynamics via a softmax transformation onto the simplex enables generalization beyond standard Gaussian noise, with closed-form transition and score functions suitable for discrete or bounded generative modeling.
• Multimodal Foundation Models: Architectures integrating frozen LLM backbones, visual encoders, and diffusion-based image generators (e.g., ChefFusion), combine cross-modal mapping layers and specialized tokens, with training losses aligning latent embeddings across language and image domains, demonstrating diffusion recipes for joint text–image generation and retrieval.

---

6. Summary Table: Principal Model Types and Features

Model/Recipe Level	Key Feature(s)	Applicability / Impact
Multinomial Diffusion Equation (MDE)	Integer, fluctuation-consistent, mass-conserving	Low-density, microscopic diffusional systems
Score-Based Generative Models (SGM/DDPM)	SDE/Markov chain over data, NN denoising	High-dim. data synthesis, inversion, images
Double Diffusivity, ILG, Stochastic	Coupled PDEs, high-order/stochastic terms	Nanomaterials, porous media, heat conduction
Pseudo-Compartment Hybrid	Adaptive regime coupling PDE & compartments	Multiscale biological and chemical systems
Voxel/Grand Canonical Diffusion	Voxel grids, variable atom number	Crystals, grain boundaries, atomic defects
Mixture-Based, Gibbs-Extended Recipes	Mixtures over posteriors, data-augmented MCMC	Inverse problems, audio source separation
Simplex or Unit Cube SDEs	Softmax-mapped OU, closed-form score	Categorical, bounded data, image modeling
Multimodal with LLM/CLIP/Diffusion	Text–image fusion, cross-modal mappings	Food computing, information-rich dialogue

---

7. Concluding Perspective

Diffusion-based model recipes encompass a family of mathematically principled, physically motivated, and algorithmically flexible constructs for stochastic modeling, generative synthesis, and inverse problem solving across scientific and engineering disciplines. Their adaptability to particle-scale fluctuations, multiscale hybridization, high-dimensional generative synthesis, and recent advances in architectural and inference paradigms underscore their centrality in modern probabilistic modeling. The practical recipe—designing forward and reverse dynamics, score- or denoiser-based network training, adaptive sampling, and domain-specific adaptation—supports robust, efficient, and theory-grounded applications for a wide array of data regimes and modalities.