DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B (Formal Theorem Prover for Lean 4)

DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B is an open-source LLM designed for state-of-the-art formal mathematical theorem proving in Lean 4. It is grounded in the DeepSeek-V3 architecture (Mixture-of-Experts Transformer, 671B parameters, 37B active per token), and specifically engineered to unify informal chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning with formally verifiable Lean code generation. DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B achieves benchmark-leading results on MiniF2F and PutnamBench, and demonstrates that the longstanding gap between informal (natural language) and formal (proof assistant-compatible) mathematical reasoning in LLMs is narrowing considerably.

1. Model Architecture and Reasoning Modes

DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B is built upon the DeepSeek-V3 Mixture-of-Experts architecture with two central innovations: Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA) for memory-efficient context handling, and DeepSeekMoE for scalable, communication-efficient sparse computation. The model’s formal reasoning specialization involves extensive SFT and RL on Lean 4 proof tasks, using both chain-of-thought and direct proof script synthesis.

• Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Reasoning: The model supports step-by-step decompositions, mimicking human problem-solving with explicit intermediate steps that are subsequently formalized and verified in Lean 4.
• Concise (non-CoT) Mode: For efficient proof script generation without overt stepwise explanations, suitable for production or direct Lean 4 ingestion.
• Formal Target: Native output is Lean 4 code, ensuring compatibility with modern mathematical proof assistants.

This integration of informal and formal reasoning enables DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B to plan, decompose, and verify mathematic arguments much like an experienced human mathematician, but at the scale and speed of a large LLM.

2. Training Pipeline: Synthetic Data, Curriculum, and RL

The training procedure for DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B blends synthetic data generation with advanced curriculum and reinforcement learning techniques:

• Recursive Theorem Proving Pipeline with DeepSeek-V3:
  • Begin with DeepSeek-V3 generating high-level proof sketches and subgoal decompositions for complex mathematics problems.
  • Each subgoal is formalized to Lean 4 code (with sorry placeholders where needed).
  • These subgoals are recursively solved using a smaller LLM-based prover; all successful subproofs are compiled into a full, verifiable Lean script.
• Curriculum Construction:
  • Subgoals and their formalizations are added to the data pipeline, building from easier (shorter, decomposed) problems up to the original complex theorems.
  • Both chain-of-thought (annotated) and direct script samples are used.
• Reinforcement Learning (GRPO Algorithm):
  • After initial SFT, the model is improved via Group Relative Policy Optimization, using formal proof verification in Lean 4 as a binary reward signal.
  • An auxiliary structure consistency reward early in RL promotes outputs that respect the planned proof structure and avoid skipping necessary intermediate lemmas.
• Cognitive Behaviors and Data Augmentation:
  • Training incorporates prompts and samples designed to promote reflection, error detection, and correction, echoing best practices found in human mathematical reasoning (Zhang et al., 8 Apr 2025 ).
  • The combined effect is a model both adept at producing correct proofs and robust at self-improvement through recursive bootstrapping.

3. Performance Metrics and Benchmark Results

DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B sets new performance records across a range of formal mathematics benchmarks:

• Comparison to Other Models:
  • Greatly surpasses prior 7B and stepwise models in pass rates (e.g., >10% higher on MiniF2F-test).
  • For AIME 2024–2025, DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B (solves 6/15) approaches the performance of DeepSeek-V3 in informal answer-finding mode (8/15), illustrating the reduction of the informal–formal gap.
• Proof Quality:
  • Proofs generated are formally verified in Lean, are concise, and often leverage competition-math-style strategies.
  • CoT mode substantially improves sample efficiency and coverage, validating the efficacy of explicit intermediate reasoning.

4. Model Efficiency, Scaling, and Quantization

DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B’s architecture is optimized for both computational efficiency and large-scale deployment:

• Sparsity and Active Parameters: Only 37B parameters are activated per token (out of 671B total), reducing both training and inference cost compared to fully dense models.
• Memory and Throughput: MLA significantly compresses attention KV memory (up to 93.3% reduction compared to standard MHA), enabling large-context operation (128K tokens).
• Training Infrastructure: Distributed pipeline, tensor, and expert parallelism alongside advanced ZeRO optimization keeps device memory manageable even at largest scales (Zhang et al., 11 Feb 2025 ).
• Quantization: 4-bit quantization (Q4_K_M) and dynamic 3-bit quantization (DQ3_K_M) reduce model memory to 377GB and 281GB respectively, with negligible accuracy drop (<1%). DQ3_K_M enables single-node, multi-GPU deployment for local/private inference (Zhao et al., 5 May 2025 ).

5. Impact on Formal and Informal Reasoning

DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B’s success illustrates the convergence between informal mathematical problem solving and formal proof automation:

• Empirical Narrowing of the Reasoning Gap: On challenging benchmarks such as AIME, the model’s rate of formal proof generation nearly matches that of informal answer-finding via LLMs like DeepSeek-V3.
• Automated Curriculum: By decomposing and formalizing subgoals, DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B enables scalable generation of training material, driving self-improvement analogous to “self-play” in game AI.
• Open Source and Evaluation: With the release of ProverBench and trained models, the community gains new testbeds and resources for further research.

6. Methodological Innovations and Synergies

The DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B approach demonstrates key methodological advances:

• Recursive Data Generation: Synthetic, recursively verified proof data overcomes the scarcity of high-quality formal training resources, as formalization and proof search are jointly LLM-driven (Xin et al., 23 May 2024 ).
• Unification of Reasoning Modalities: The use of chain-of-thought both for informal planning and as an input to RL enables transfer of strategies between natural language and formal code domains.
• RL on Lean 4 Rewards: The binary verifier signal from Lean 4 is essential for aligning model behavior with strict formal correctness (Zhang et al., 8 Apr 2025 , Ren et al., 30 Apr 2025 ).
• Efficient Test-Time Computation: Search strategies such as block-wise value-guided search and temporal consistency methods demonstrated on DeepSeek-R1 and its distilled variants may plausibly offer further efficiency and reliability boosters when integrated at 671B scale (Wang et al., 23 May 2025 , Guo et al., 18 Mar 2025 ).

7. Comparative Landscape and Future Directions

• Relative to Human Mathematicians and Prior LLMs: DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B, by matching informal solution rates with formal proof rates, moves LLMs closer to supporting both mathematician-style speculation and rigorous formal verification in a unified system.
• Stepwise vs. Whole-Proof Paradigms: While DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B adopts a “whole-proof by subgoal” approach, recent stepwise provers employing multi-perspective, critic-plus-heuristic search (e.g., MPS-Prover) achieve competitive or even superior efficiency in certain regimes with far fewer parameters (Liang et al., 16 May 2025 ).
• Implications for Automated Science: The DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B pipeline—particularly the recursive, RL-driven augmentation of proof data—suggests scalable pathways for LLMs to act as both automated mathematicians and formal verifiers in collaborative scientific workflows.

References Table

Conclusion

DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B exemplifies the successful unification of informal reasoning and formal mathematical proof synthesis within a large Mixture-of-Experts LLM. Leveraging recursive data generation, strong RL on formal reward signals, and architectural efficiencies originating from DeepSeek-V3, it raises state-of-the-art pass rates on verifiable Lean 4 proof benchmarks. The repercussion is a narrowing divide between “thinking like a mathematician” and “proving like a machine,” and a rapidly expanding frontier for open-source formal reasoning systems at scale.