Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Uncertainty quantification with approximate variational learning for wearable photoplethysmography prediction tasks (2505.11412v1)

Published 16 May 2025 in cs.LG and eess.SP

Abstract: Photoplethysmography (PPG) signals encode information about relative changes in blood volume that can be used to assess various aspects of cardiac health non-invasively, e.g.\ to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) or predict blood pressure (BP). Deep networks are well-equipped to handle the large quantities of data acquired from wearable measurement devices. However, they lack interpretability and are prone to overfitting, leaving considerable risk for poor performance on unseen data and misdiagnosis. Here, we describe the use of two scalable uncertainty quantification techniques: Monte Carlo Dropout and the recently proposed Improved Variational Online Newton. These techniques are used to assess the trustworthiness of models trained to perform AF classification and BP regression from raw PPG time series. We find that the choice of hyperparameters has a considerable effect on the predictive performance of the models and on the quality and composition of predicted uncertainties. E.g. the stochasticity of the model parameter sampling determines the proportion of the total uncertainty that is aleatoric, and has varying effects on predictive performance and calibration quality dependent on the chosen uncertainty quantification technique and the chosen expression of uncertainty. We find significant discrepancy in the quality of uncertainties over the predicted classes, emphasising the need for a thorough evaluation protocol that assesses local and adaptive calibration. This work suggests that the choice of hyperparameters must be carefully tuned to balance predictive performance and calibration quality, and that the optimal parameterisation may vary depending on the chosen expression of uncertainty.

Summary

  • The paper highlights operational reliability issues in automated PDF conversion systems used by academic repositories, showing how failures impede research accessibility and knowledge transfer.
  • Failed conversions necessitate researchers taking extra steps like providing alternative formats or direct access, impacting practical dissemination workflows and accessibility.
  • Improving automated conversion systems through enhanced algorithms, AI integration, or manual checks could increase robustness and accessibility for varied academic documents.

Exploring the Challenges of Automated PDF Conversion in Academic Research

This paper, identified with the reference number (2505.11412)v1, addresses the technical issues surrounding the automated conversion of academic documents into PDF format within the arXiv repository. While details of the content are limited due to its unavailability in PDF format, the implications of the noted challenges hold significance for the broader landscape of academic publication and dissemination.

The paper highlights the technical intricacies inherent in automating the conversion process from various source formats to PDF, a crucial step for accessibility in scholarly communication. This challenge is underscored by the failure of arXiv's system to process the specified document accurately, necessitating consideration of alternative methods or direct contact with the authors to access the content.

Key Considerations:

  • Operational Reliability: The inability to convert certain papers into PDF form poses potential barriers to the efficient dissemination of information, impacting the availability and accessibility of research findings. The system's reliability is a critical component that influences the overall efficiency of knowledge transfer within academic communities.
  • Practical Implications: For researchers, the failure in conversion might necessitate additional steps to ensure their work is accessible, such as providing alternative formats or maintaining communication channels through which interested parties can request access.
  • System Improvements: Exploring solutions to improve the automated conversion system could lead to enhanced robustness and reliability in handling diverse document types. Potential avenues include advancing algorithmic capabilities for format interpretation and conversion, integration of machine learning techniques for error correction, or development of a fallback manual check system for problematic instances.

Future Perspectives:

The challenges addressed could precipitate advancements in automated document processing technologies, further refining the systems that underpin academic resource repositories. As AI and machine learning technologies evolve, they may offer improved tools for document parsing and conversion, reducing failure rates and broadening access to scientific knowledge. For example, AI-driven systems might more effectively interpret a wide range of document schemas, facilitating seamless conversion across varied formats and enhancing accessibility.

In summary, the issues emphasized in this paper contribute to the ongoing dialogue around improving technological systems crucial for academic dissemination. Solving these problems may not only improve current operational systems but could also influence future developments in handling academic document formats, thereby better connecting researchers with critical research outputs.