QualBench: Benchmarking Chinese LLMs with Localized Professional Qualifications for Vertical Domain Evaluation
The paper "QualBench: Benchmarking Chinese LLMs with Localized Professional Qualifications for Vertical Domain Evaluation" addresses the critical need for domain-specific evaluation frameworks in assessing the performance of Chinese LLMs. As Chinese LLMs continue to evolve and integrate into various applications, it is essential to have standardized and relevant benchmarks that reflect their interactions within a local context. This paper introduces QualBench, a novel multi-domain Chinese QA benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLMs against localized professional qualifications, thereby filling significant gaps in current benchmarking practices.
Core Contributions and Findings
The paper's primary contribution is the construction of a comprehensive dataset encompassing over 17,000 questions derived from 24 professional qualification exams across six vertical domains, including production safety, civil engineering, fire safety, oil and gas, economics and finance, and banking and insurance. This strategic alignment with national standards ensures the benchmark’s relevance to the Chinese context and enhances the evaluation's realism.
Notably, the evaluation results reveal that localized models, such as Qwen2.5, outperform more globally-oriented counterparts like GPT-4o. The best model achieved an accuracy of 75.26%, indicating a marginally satisfactory pass rate but highlighting substantial room for improvement in certain domain-specific applications.
Furthermore, Chinese LLMs consistently surpass non-Chinese models, emphasizing the importance of localized domain knowledge for effective application within the Chinese environment. This observation underscores the necessity for benchmarks that not only account for linguistic capabilities but also reflect cultural and regulatory nuances that impact practical utility.
Additional Insights and Implications
The paper discusses the limitations of existing benchmarks, which predominantly focus on language capabilities without sufficient coverage of domain-specific knowledge. By integrating professional qualification exams into the evaluation framework, QualBench provides a more holistic approach that aligns model capabilities with human expertise and regulatory standards.
Moreover, the paper highlights the inadequacy of LLM collaboration mechanisms like crowdsourcing, which were unable to outperform a single strong model. This highlights the potential for optimizing aggregation techniques that can better leverage multi-LLM responses.
Future Directions and Potential Developments
The authors propose two promising avenues for further research and development:
- Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG): Incorporating external knowledge bases to enhance LLM performance in domain-specific tasks. This approach involves constructing cross-domain knowledge graphs to facilitate effective retrieval and contextually-grounded answer generation.
- Federated Learning for Domain-Specific Training: Harnessing private domain data through federated learning can address data scarcity issues and improve domain knowledge coverage without compromising data privacy and security.
The paper demonstrates a foundational effort to push the boundaries of Chinese LLM evaluation by addressing localization and domain coverage comprehensively. As LLMs continue to advance, QualBench provides a critical framework for assessing their readiness for deployment in specialized fields within China. Such endeavors are vital for ensuring that AI systems not only understand language intricacies but also embody the technical precision and contextual knowledge necessary for real-world applications.