Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Resilience and implications of adiabatic CMB cooling (2505.02909v1)

Published 5 May 2025 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: We investigate potential deviations from the standard adiabatic evolution of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature, $T_{\rm CMB}(z)$, using the latest Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect measurements and molecular line excitation data, covering a combined redshift range of $0 < z \lesssim 6$. We follow different approaches. First, we reconstruct the redshift evolution of $T_{\rm CMB}(z)$ in a model-independent way using Gaussian Process regression. The tightest constraints come from SZ measurements at $z < 1$, while molecular line data at $z > 3$ yield broader uncertainties. By combining both datasets, we find good consistency with the standard evolution across the full analysed redshift range, inferring a present-day CMB monopole temperature of $T_0 = 2.744 \pm 0.019$ K. Next, we test for deviations from the standard scaling by adopting the parameterisation $T_{\rm CMB}(z) = T_0(1+z){1-\beta}$, where $\beta$ quantifies departures from adiabaticity, with $\beta = 0$ corresponding to the standard scenario. In this framework, we use Gaussian Process reconstruction to test the consistency of $\beta = 0$ across the full redshift range and perform $\chi2$ minimisation techniques to determine the best-fit values of $T_0$ and $\beta$. In both cases, we find good consistency with the standard temperature-redshift relation. The $\chi2$-minimisation analysis yields best-fit values of $\beta = -0.0106 \pm 0.0124$ and $T_0 = 2.7276 \pm 0.0095$ K, in excellent agreement with both $\beta = 0$ and independent direct measurements of $T_0$ from FIRAS and ARCADE. We discuss the implications of our findings, which offer strong empirical support for the standard cosmological prediction and place tight constraints on a wide range of alternative scenarios of interest in the context of cosmological tensions and fundamental physics.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.