Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
134 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The inversion statistic in derangements and in other permutations with a prescribed number of fixed points (2505.02058v1)

Published 4 May 2025 in math.PR and math.CO

Abstract: We study how the inversion statistic is influenced by fixed points in a permutation. %The expected number of inversions in a uniformly random permutation in $S_n$ is $\frac{n(n-1)}4$. For each $n\in\mathbb{N}$, and each $k\in{0,1,\cdots, n}$, let $P_n{(k)}$ denote the uniform probability measure on the set of permutations in $S_n$ with exactly $k$ fixed points. We obtain an exact formula for the expected number of inversions under the measure $P_n{(k)}$ as well as for $P_n{(k)}(\sigma{-1}_i<\sigma{-1}_j)$, for $1\le i<j\le n$, the $P_n{(k)}$-probability that the number $i$ precedes the number $j$. In particular, up to a super-exponentially small correction as $n\to\infty$, the expected number of inversions in a random derangement $(k=0)$ is $\frac16n+\frac1{12}$ more than the value $\frac{n(n-1)}4$ that one obtains for a uniformly random general permutation in $S_n$. On the other hand, up to a super-exponentially small correction, for $k\ge2$, the expected number of inversions in a random permutation with $k$ fixed points is $\frac{k-1}6n+\frac{k2-k-1}{12}$ less than $\frac{n(n-1)}4$. In the borderline case, $k=1$, up to a super-exponentially small correction, the expected number of inversions in a random permutation with one fixed point is $\frac1{12}$ more than $\frac{n(n-1)}4$. The proofs make strategic and perhaps novel use of the Chinese restaurant construction for a uniformly random permutation.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com