Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Simple Universally Optimal Dijkstra (2504.17327v1)

Published 24 Apr 2025 in cs.DS

Abstract: Let G be a weighted (directed) graph with n vertices and m edges. Given a source vertex s, Dijkstra's algorithm computes the shortest path lengths from s to all other vertices in O(m + n log n) time. This bound is known to be worst-case optimal via a reduction to sorting. Theoretical computer science has developed numerous fine-grained frameworks for analyzing algorithmic performance beyond standard worst-case analysis, such as instance optimality and output sensitivity. Haeupler et al. [FOCS '24] consider the notion of universal optimality, a refined complexity measure that accounts for both the graph topology and the edge weights. For a fixed graph topology, the universal running time of a weighted graph algorithm is defined as its worst-case running time over all possible edge weightings of G. An algorithm is universally optimal if no other algorithm achieves a better asymptotic universal running time on any particular graph topology. They show that Dijkstra's algorithm can be made universally optimal by replacing the heap with a custom data structure. We revisit their result. We introduce a simple heap property called timestamp optimality, where the cost of popping an element x is logarithmic in the number of elements inserted between pushing and popping x. We show that timestamp optimal heaps are not only easier to define but also easier to implement. Using these timestamps, we provide a significantly simpler proof that Dijkstra's algorithm, with the right kind of heap, is universally optimal.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a simplified framework for universally optimal Dijkstra's algorithm based on timestamp optimality, a concept simpler than working-set bounds.
  • The approach simplifies the construction of necessary heap structures and the proof required to demonstrate universal optimality for the algorithm.
  • This simplification makes implementing and verifying universally optimal algorithms easier, bridging theoretical complexity with practical applications.

An Essay on "Simpler Universally Optimal Dijkstra" by Ivor van der Hoog, Eva Rotenberg, and Daniel Rutschmann

The presented paper focuses on a simplification of Dijkstra's algorithm to achieve universal optimality, a concept formalized by Haeupler et al. at FOCS 2024. The authors transform Dijkstra’s algorithm, a classic for solving the single-source shortest path (SSSP) problem, into one that meets the stringent criteria of universal optimality—a property ensuring optimal performance across all graph topologies and edge weight configurations.

Background and Motivation

Dijkstra's algorithm is widely known for computing the shortest paths from a single source in O(m+nlogn)O(m + n \log n) time complexity, where nn and mm denote the number of vertices and edges, respectively. This traditional analysis, however, focuses on worst-case scenarios. The notion of universal optimality extends beyond worst-case by requiring an algorithm to maintain efficiency across any fixed graph structure by minimizing edge weight influence.

The foundational work by Haeupler et al. demonstrated that achieving universal optimality necessitates incorporating custom data structures enhancing traditional heaps' efficiency. Specifically, they integrated structures based on the working-set size, a metric that gauges a heap element's contextually determined access cost during the algorithm's execution.

Research Contributions

This paper primarily supplements the universal optimality concept by offering a simplified variant of the theoretical framework and the accompanying heap structure. The key contributions include:

  1. Timestamp Optimal Heap Construction: The authors introduce timestamp optimality, a notably simpler concept than the working-set bound. Here, the cost to pop an element is guided by the logarithmic difference between the insertion and removal timestamps, simplifying the data structure's design and proof complexity.
  2. Simplification of Universal Optimality Proof: The traditional proof for universal optimality involves complex heap operations and non-trivial analysis. The timestamp-based approach simplifies this by using a global time counter to manage heap operations and providing a more direct analysis route to confirm universal optimality.
  3. Comprehensive Theoretical Analysis: The proposed simplification still retains the analytical rigor required to verify that Dijkstra's algorithm modified by timestamp heaps satisfies universal lower bounds for running times across all edge weight permutations in a given graph topology.

Implications and Future Directions

The introduction of timestamp optimality facilitates easier implementation and verification of universally optimal algorithms beyond the reach of previous heap-based strategies. This simplification not only underscores a deeper understanding of heap dynamics in theoretical computer science but also bridges towards creating more accessible and maintainable algorithmic solutions in practice.

The implications extend into algorithmic design, where reducing theoretical complexity can make advanced concepts more approachable for practical implementation, potentially influencing fields like route planning, network optimization, and larger domains in which SSSP problems are fundamental.

Future work may involve extending these findings to non-comparative models or exploring generalizations to other classic graph algorithms, maintaining or possibly improving the balance between theoretical depth and practical applicability. The universal optimality goal encourages exploring diverse graph properties and operations that streamline algorithms comprehensively across all plausible instances.

In sum, "Simpler Universally Optimal Dijkstra" adds significant simplicity and clarity to the paper of universally optimal algorithms, promoting a collaborative bridge between theory and application while exploring new frontiers of algorithmic performance.