Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Direct Advantage Regression: Aligning LLMs with Online AI Reward (2504.14177v1)

Published 19 Apr 2025 in cs.AI, cs.CL, and cs.HC

Abstract: Online AI Feedback (OAIF) presents a promising alternative to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) by utilizing online AI preference in aligning LLMs. However, the straightforward replacement of humans with AI deprives LLMs from learning more fine-grained AI supervision beyond binary signals. In this paper, we propose Direct Advantage Regression (DAR), a simple alignment algorithm using online AI reward to optimize policy improvement through weighted supervised fine-tuning. As an RL-free approach, DAR maintains theoretical consistency with online RLHF pipelines while significantly reducing implementation complexity and improving learning efficiency. Our empirical results underscore that AI reward is a better form of AI supervision consistently achieving higher human-AI agreement as opposed to AI preference. Additionally, evaluations using GPT-4-Turbo and MT-bench show that DAR outperforms both OAIF and online RLHF baselines.

Assessment of Direct Advantage Regression for LLM Alignment with AI Rewards

In this paper, the authors propose Direct Advantage Regression (DAR), a novel methodology designed to align LLMs with online AI rewards. DAR serves as a hybrid algorithm employing a direct advantage weighted supervised fine-tuning loss, allowing for RL-free optimization. This innovation targets the shortcomings of existing online AI Feedback (OAIF) paradigms and aims to resolve the oversimplified AI preference signals that neglect granular supervisory details valuable in iterative policy refinement for LLMs. The work notably contributes to the broader context of improving AI reward systems that aim to replace Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF).

Core Contributions

DAR introduces several advancements and resolves critical limitations prevalent in prior methodologies, primarily focusing on these three areas:

  1. AI Reward versus AI Preference: The paper presents an empirical comparison demonstrating that AI rewards facilitate superior alignment with human preferences than binary AI preference labels. Using various models as AI annotators, the paper's dataset evaluations consistently affirm higher human-AI agreement scores with AI rewards, underscoring its enhanced supervisory richness.
  2. Algorithm Design: DAR sidesteps the conventional complexity of RL by employing an Expectation-Maximization (EM) framework optimized through advantage-weighted regression. By leveraging dual KL-constraint targets, the DAR maintains policy stability and improves learning efficiency, diverging from the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) trends that depend heavily on value modeling.
  3. Performance Metrics and Benchmarks: The empirical results of DAR highlight significant alignment improvements in GPT-4-Turbo and MT-bench benchmarks, outperforming existing OAIF and RLHF frameworks. The tests reveal that DAR significantly reduces the requisite amount of online annotations, thereby offering a pragmatic enhancement in resource efficiency for LLM training with consistent performance gains across different evaluation matrices.

Implications and Future Directions

The findings in DAR yield substantial implications for both theoretical discourse and practical applications. By shifting the paradigm from human-centric RLHF to AI-oriented supervisory signals, it sets a precedent for future explorations in scalable AI model alignment. The prospect of further distilling AI reward mechanisms could refine the granularity of supervisory information, fostering deeper AI understanding and task-specific expertise.

Moreover, the extension of DAR to multimodal AI tasks and its further integration into varied alignment contexts posits a transformative shift in designing AI systems resilient to overfitting to specific supervision types. Its application could transcend LLMs, aligning cross-domain AI models in areas such as visual-linguistic tasks and complex decision-making environments.

Conclusion

The introduction of Direct Advantage Regression marks a pivotal step in evolving LLM alignment methodology, emphasizing the utility of AI-reward based signals over traditional RLHF pathways. This approach not only enhances alignment efficacy but also reduces operational complexity, presenting a robust solution to meet diverse AI alignment needs. As DAR continues to evolve and integrate with broader AI landscapes, it is poised to redefine standardized practices for efficient, scalable, and reliable model tuning methods.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Li He (74 papers)
  2. He Zhao (117 papers)
  3. Stephen Wan (10 papers)
  4. Dadong Wang (26 papers)
  5. Lina Yao (194 papers)
  6. Tongliang Liu (251 papers)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com