Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
131 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Robust Mean Estimation for Optimization: The Impact of Heavy Tails (2503.21421v1)

Published 27 Mar 2025 in math.OC, math.PR, math.ST, and stat.TH

Abstract: We consider the problem of constructing a least conservative estimator of the expected value $\mu$ of a non-negative heavy-tailed random variable. We require that the probability of overestimating the expected value $\mu$ is kept appropriately small; a natural requirement if its subsequent use in a decision process is anticipated. In this setting, we show it is optimal to estimate $\mu$ by solving a distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problem using the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. We further show that the statistical properties of KL-DRO compare favorably with other estimators based on truncation, variance regularization, or Wasserstein DRO.

Summary

Robust Mean Estimation in Optimization: Heavy-Tailed Implications

The paper "Robust Mean Estimation for Optimization: The Impact of Heavy Tails" by Bart P.G. Van Parys and Bert Zwart explores the robust estimation of the mean for optimization problems where the underlying data is characterized by heavy-tailed distributions. Heavy-tailed data is prevalent in various practical scenarios, such as financial returns and insurance claims, where rare but significant deviations are critical to take into account. This paper presents the Kullback-Leibler (KL)-based distributionally robust optimization (DRO) approach as a promising method for handling such data.

Theoretical Foundations and Challenges

The authors begin by acknowledging the traditional optimization focus on mean estimation from stochastic distributions, often under the assumption of having light tails or finite variance. Yet, in real-world applications, data often exhibits heavy-tail behavior, making conventional methods prone to error—particularly the risk of underestimating the variance and mean due to the influence of outliers.

DRO offers a framework for incorporating model uncertainty in optimization, seeking optimal decisions under a worst-case distribution scenario defined within an ambiguity set. By using statistical divergences like KL, the DRO formulation provides a robust approach to mean estimation that can withstand the tail-risk of data better than conventional methods like sample mean, truncated mean, and variance regularization.

Analysis and Comparisons

Through rigorous mathematical analysis, the paper demonstrates that the KL-DRO approach maintains its optimality even in the presence of heavy-tailed data, which disrupts many existing methods. The authors introduce several standard estimators, such as sample means and Wasserstein DRO, pointing out their shortcomings when handling heavy-tailed distributions, either due to excessive conservatism or insufficient robustness.

The authors propose that truncation methods, though potentially effective, require precise knowledge of higher-order moments, which is not always feasible in practical scenarios. Likewise, they critique variance-based regularization for potentially overcompensating due to heavy-tailed data, leading to excessive conservatism without necessarily optimizing decision-making efficacy.

Main Results

A significant contribution of the paper is the establishment of KL-DRO as an optimal estimator in heavy-tailed scenarios. It does so by deriving theoretical guarantees showing that KL-DRO formulations retain favorable statistical properties—particularly in terms of minimizing disappointment rates of underestimation compared to other methods. KL-DRO effectively balances the trade-off between robustness and conservatism, ensuring reliable decision-making performance in uncertain environments.

The paper presents thorough mathematical evidence that KL-DRO retains its superiority based on a large deviation argument and dual properties analysis. Notably, the authors demonstrate that the variance regularization approximation tends to fail under heavy tails, contrasted with the KL-DRO's ability to mitigate influences of extreme data efficiently.

Practical Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this research are profound for fields relying on robust optimization under uncertainty, such as finance, risk management, and machine learning. The insights can enhance algorithms' reliability in predictive modeling, thereby improving decision-making accuracy concerning scenarios with rare but impactful events.

Future studies may explore the extension of KL-DRO to multivariate settings or enhance computational strategies for larger-scale problems. Additionally, integrating KL-DRO insights into machine learning models could further advance algorithms tasked with understanding complex datasets with heavy-tailed characteristics.

In conclusion, Van Parys and Zwart's research provides a crucial advancement in the theory and application of robust optimization under heavy-tailed distributions, endorsing KL-DRO as a pivotal tool in navigating the probabilistic complexities inherent in real-world data applications.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com