Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
51 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
60 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Survey on Knowledge-Oriented Retrieval-Augmented Generation (2503.10677v2)

Published 11 Mar 2025 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has gained significant attention in recent years for its potential to enhance natural language understanding and generation by combining large-scale retrieval systems with generative models. RAG leverages external knowledge sources, such as documents, databases, or structured data, to improve model performance and generate more accurate and contextually relevant outputs. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive overview of RAG by examining its fundamental components, including retrieval mechanisms, generation processes, and the integration between the two. We discuss the key characteristics of RAG, such as its ability to augment generative models with dynamic external knowledge, and the challenges associated with aligning retrieved information with generative objectives. We also present a taxonomy that categorizes RAG methods, ranging from basic retrieval-augmented approaches to more advanced models incorporating multi-modal data and reasoning capabilities. Additionally, we review the evaluation benchmarks and datasets commonly used to assess RAG systems, along with a detailed exploration of its applications in fields such as question answering, summarization, and information retrieval. Finally, we highlight emerging research directions and opportunities for improving RAG systems, such as enhanced retrieval efficiency, model interpretability, and domain-specific adaptations. This paper concludes by outlining the prospects for RAG in addressing real-world challenges and its potential to drive further advancements in natural language processing.

An Overview of Knowledge-Oriented Retrieval-Augmented Generation

The paper "A Survey on Knowledge-Oriented Retrieval-Augmented Generation" presents a comprehensive exploration of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, which combine retrieval mechanisms with generative models to enhance NLP tasks. The authors focus on how RAG can leverage external knowledge sources, such as databases and structured data, to produce more accurate and contextually relevant outputs.

Core Components and Characteristics

RAG systems are distinguished by their integration of external knowledge into the generative process. They enable models to access relevant information dynamically, overcoming limitations associated with static, pre-trained data. This capability is particularly significant in domains requiring real-time or specialized knowledge, providing a means to handle out-of-vocabulary and rare entities more effectively. The paper acknowledges the critical tasks within RAG, such as the retrieval mechanisms, which ensure that relevant knowledge is accessed and presented, and generation processes that synthesize this information into coherent and contextually appropriate narratives.

The authors put forward a taxonomy of RAG methods, starting with fundamental retrieval-augmented approaches and moving to more advanced models that incorporate multi-modal data and reasoning. This taxonomy highlights the potential for RAG systems to handle complex reasoning and diverse data types, expanding their applications across various fields.

Challenges and Taxonomy

While outlining a taxonomy, the authors also address the challenges intrinsic to RAG systems, such as aligning retrieved information with generative objectives and maintaining coherence in the face of diverse knowledge sources. The paper identifies key issues in knowledge selection, retrieval efficiency, and in-context reasoning, reflecting on the complexities involved in ensuring that retrieval does not become a bottleneck in generation tasks.

To surmount these challenges, the paper suggests advancements in retrieval techniques, such as improving the efficiency and relevance of retrieval algorithms. It also explores the role of model interpretability and domain-specific adaptations in enhancing RAG systems.

Evaluation Benchmarks and Applications

The survey reviews existing evaluation benchmarks and datasets used to assess RAG systems. By providing a detailed look at benchmarks like question answering and summarization, the authors facilitate an understanding of how RAG models are tested and measured. They underscore the importance of proper evaluation in driving the development and deployment of RAG in real-world situations.

Applications of RAG systems extend across a spectrum of NLP tasks, including question answering, summarization, and information retrieval. RAG models show promise in fields where factual accuracy and context are paramount, such as law, medicine, and scientific research, where dynamic integration of extensive data sets is crucial.

Future Directions

The paper concludes by identifying emerging research directions and prospects for RAG systems. Advancements in RAG are expected to enhance retrieval efficiency, model interpretability, and domain-specific customization. There is potential for RAG to drive significant progress in natural language processing by addressing real-world challenges, enhancing the ability of systems to produce contextually grounded and factually correct content.

Implications for AI Research

The implications of this research are profound for both theoretical and applied AI. On a theoretical level, the integration of retrieval mechanisms aligns with efforts to build more robust, versatile AI systems capable of dynamic knowledge acquisition and reasoning. Practically, the deployment of RAG systems provides an opportunity to enhance the performance of AI-driven solutions across industries reliant on dynamic data and extensive knowledge integration.

Overall, this survey sheds light on the multidimensional capabilities and applications of Retrieval-Augmented Generation, offering valuable insights for researchers and practitioners aiming to harness the full potential of AI in processing and generating natural language.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (12)
  1. Mingyue Cheng (45 papers)
  2. Yucong Luo (16 papers)
  3. Jie Ouyang (12 papers)
  4. Qi Liu (485 papers)
  5. Huijie Liu (8 papers)
  6. Li Li (655 papers)
  7. Shuo Yu (35 papers)
  8. Bohou Zhang (1 paper)
  9. Jiawei Cao (5 papers)
  10. Jie Ma (205 papers)
  11. Daoyu Wang (5 papers)
  12. Enhong Chen (242 papers)