Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
51 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
60 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Survey of Large Multimodal Model Datasets, Application Categories and Taxonomy (2412.17759v1)

Published 23 Dec 2024 in cs.AI, cs.CV, and cs.LG

Abstract: Multimodal learning, a rapidly evolving field in artificial intelligence, seeks to construct more versatile and robust systems by integrating and analyzing diverse types of data, including text, images, audio, and video. Inspired by the human ability to assimilate information through many senses, this method enables applications such as text-to-video conversion, visual question answering, and image captioning. Recent developments in datasets that support multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) are highlighted in this overview. Large-scale multimodal datasets are essential because they allow for thorough testing and training of these models. With an emphasis on their contributions to the discipline, the study examines a variety of datasets, including those for training, domain-specific tasks, and real-world applications. It also emphasizes how crucial benchmark datasets are for assessing models' performance in a range of scenarios, scalability, and applicability. Since multimodal learning is always changing, overcoming these obstacles will help AI research and applications reach new heights.

Overview of Large Multimodal Model Datasets, Application Categories, and Taxonomy

The paper presents a comprehensive survey of large multimodal model datasets, aiming to map the intricate landscape of datasets supporting the development of multimodal learning models. These models integrate and process multiple data modalities such as text, images, and audio, reflecting the natural human ability to process diverse sensory inputs towards creating more robust AI systems.

Introduction to Multimodal Learning

The paper elaborates on the foundational concepts of multimodal learning, which seeks to emulate human cognitive processes by integrating varied data types. LLMs like GPT-3 face limitations when processing non-text data, prompting the evolution towards Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs). These models have shown proficiency in tasks like image captioning and visual question answering. The paper identifies key challenges such as dataset quality, computational demands, and ethical considerations, yet emphasizes the transformative potential of MLLMs across domains like healthcare and education.

Multimodal Learning Foundations

A key focus of the paper is the structure of multimodal learning systems, which operate by unifying representations from diverse data modalities. The multimodal LLM pipeline is pivotal, translating varied sensory inputs into cohesive outputs via a series of modality encoders and projectors. The paper underscores the significance of effective fusion methods, such as early and late fusion, for representation learning. The authors delve into advanced challenges like alignment, translation, and co-learning, crucial for harmonizing temporal and semantic information across data types.

Opportunities and Challenges in MLLMs

The paper details the capabilities and obstacles associated with MLLMs, highlighting their extension of LLM capacities into more complex, multimodal tasks. However, the scarcity of high-quality datasets, along with the unique computational pressures of managing multiple data types in parallel, remains a substantial barrier. The authors propose that innovations in model architectures and training strategies are necessary to streamline MLLM development and practical deployment while also ensuring the ethical alignment of these sophisticated systems.

Multimodal Datasets: Classification and Implications

The authors provide a taxonomy of multimodal datasets, classified into training-specific, task-specific, and domain-specific applications. For training, datasets like LAION-5B and MS-COCO are instrumental, facilitating the pre-training and instruction tuning of MLLMs. Task-specific datasets cater to niche applications such as sentiment analysis or visual question answering. In contrast, domain-specific datasets are designed for particular fields like medical imaging or autonomous driving, addressing respective industry peculiarities and regulations.

The paper names significant datasets like SlideVQA for document understanding, Peacock for culturally resonant multimodal research, and InternVid for video-based applications. It mentions datasets that support real-world applications, highlighting how they contribute to refining AI's data comprehension and task execution capabilities within distinct industries.

Emerging Trends and Future Needs

The trajectory of multimodal learning points towards datasets that better mimic real-world complexities and broad geographical representations. The authors recommend the collection of diverse sensory data such as tactile or physiological signals, especially for applications requiring intricate intermodal interactions like those in autonomous systems or healthcare. Future dataset curation needs to place significant emphasis on ethical considerations, ensuring responsible usage and reducing bias.

Conclusion

Overall, the paper illustrates the vast and evolving landscape of multimodal dataset resources critical for progressing multimodal learning systems. As the field matures, the growth and refinement of such datasets will be pivotal for successfully harnessing the capabilities of LLMs extended via multimodal capacities, thereby enhancing their deployment across diverse real-world applications and settings. This systematic outline serves as a valuable guidepost for researchers navigating multimodal datasets within the context of advanced AI system development.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Priyaranjan Pattnayak (9 papers)
  2. Hitesh Laxmichand Patel (9 papers)
  3. Bhargava Kumar (8 papers)
  4. Amit Agarwal (143 papers)
  5. Ishan Banerjee (11 papers)
  6. Srikant Panda (8 papers)
  7. Tejaswini Kumar (5 papers)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com