- The paper presents an inference-aware training paradigm that optimizes best-of-N sampling directly during the training phase.
- It introduces novel imitation learning and reinforcement learning approaches to address the non-differentiability challenges in output selection.
- Empirical results show significant improvements, with Gemma 2B Bo32 performance rising from 26.8% to 30.8% and pass@32 accuracy from 60.0% to 67.0%.
Inference-Aware Fine-Tuning for Best-of-N Sampling in LLMs
Introduction
The paper, "Inference-Aware Fine-Tuning for Best-of-N Sampling in LLMs," explores the optimization of LLMs by fine-tuning these models to improve inference-time strategies directly. The authors propose a methodology termed inference-aware fine-tuning, with a focus on the Best-of-N (BoN) sampling strategy. This strategy involves generating multiple model outputs and selecting the best one according to a verifier's scoring function. The paper advances the application of BoN sampling by integrating it into the training process using imitation learning and reinforcement learning (RL) techniques.
Key Contributions
The authors identify several key contributions in their research, providing robust methodologies and insights into the training and utilization of LLMs with BoN inference strategies:
- Inference-Aware Training Paradigm: The paper introduces an inference-aware training paradigm, specifically designed to optimize the performance of LLMs by considering the inference mechanism during the training phase. This focus contrasts with traditional methods that treat inference-time computation as a separate, post-hoc decision.
- BoN-Aware Imitation and Reinforcement Learning Approaches: By addressing the challenge of non-differentiability in the argmax operator integral to BoN strategies, the authors develop novel imitation learning and RL approaches. These methods account for the exploration-exploitation trade-off crucial for optimizing inference outcomes in LLMs.
- Empirical Evaluation: Empirical studies performed by the authors demonstrate significant improvements in model performance. Notably, their methods increased the Bo32 performance of the Gemma 2B model on the Hendrycks MATH benchmark from 26.8% to 30.8%, and pass@32 accuracy from 60.0% to 67.0%. Similar improvements were observed on coding benchmarks, reinforcing the potential of their proposed techniques.
Methodology
The paper outlines a BoN inference strategy where the LLM generates multiple candidate responses, and a verifier selects the optimal output based on a scoring function. The research foregrounds a co-scaling relationship between exploration temperature and the number of samples N, influencing both exploration and output quality. The authors devised both supervised fine-tuning and RL frameworks to align the models' distributions with the BoN policy distribution, thereby achieving better inference-time performance.
- BoN-SFT (Supervised Fine-Tuning): Utilizing a variational inference approach, the authors develop a solution for supervised fine-tuning that adapts the likelihood of expert responses and adjusts the model's policy to be more exploratory through regularization.
- BoN-RL (Reinforcement Learning): This approach leverages RL frameworks to optimize LLMs directly for inference strategies that use the BoN policy. The method involves training models to maximize expected rewards of outputs selected through BoN sampling, which incorporates both the complexity of verifier error tolerance and environment reward learning.
Implications and Prospects
The implications of this research are substantial, both in practical and theoretical realms. Practically, the enhanced methodologies for inference-aware fine-tuning of LLMs promise a more efficient deployment of computational resources, emphasizing the potential in refining inference-time strategies over brute-force model size expansions. Theoretically, the alignment between training and inference through BoN-aware strategies elucidates new pathways in model optimization that go beyond standard pre-training and fine-tuning separations.
The findings provoke further inquiry into inference-optimized neural network training, suggesting that these methods could extend to other complex neural architectures and application domains. Future developments might also explore extending these techniques to varying downstream tasks with distinct verification processes or leveraging more sophisticated verification models to enhance BoN accuracy.
Overall, this paper contributes meaningful advancements in optimizing LLM operations, enhancing performance metrics in computationally constrained environments, and providing a structured framework for further exploration in inference-aware model training and optimization strategies.