Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Generative AI as a lab partner: a case study (2412.11300v1)

Published 15 Dec 2024 in physics.ed-ph

Abstract: Generative AI tools, including the popular ChatGPT, have made a clear mark on discourses related to future work and education practices. Previous research in science education has highlighted the potential for generative AI in various education-related areas, including generating valuable discussion material, solving physics problems, and acting as a tutor. However, little research has been done regarding the role of generative AI tools in laboratory work, an essential part of science education, and physics education specifically. Here we show various ways in which high school students use ChatGPT during a physics laboratory session and discuss the relevance of using generative AI tools to investigate acoustic levitation and the speed of sound in air. The findings show agreement with previous research regarding the importance of educating students about the capabilities and limitations of using generative AI. Contrasting fruitful and problematic interactions with ChatGPT during lab sessions with seven lab groups involving 19 high school students made it possible to identify that ChatGPT can be a helpful tool in the physics laboratory. However, the teacher plays a crucial role in identifying students' needs and capabilities of understanding the potential and limitations of generative AI. As such, our findings show that generative AI tools may handle some questions and problems and thus demonstrate their potential to help distribute teachers' workload more equitably during laboratory sessions. Finally, this study serves as an important point of discussion regarding the ways in which students need support and training to efficiently utilize generative AI to further their learning of physics.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Sebastian Kilde-Westberg (1 paper)
  2. Andreas Johansson (5 papers)
  3. Jonas Enger (2 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.