Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Heuristically Adaptive Diffusion-Model Evolutionary Strategy (2411.13420v1)

Published 20 Nov 2024 in cs.NE, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: Diffusion Models represent a significant advancement in generative modeling, employing a dual-phase process that first degrades domain-specific information via Gaussian noise and restores it through a trainable model. This framework enables pure noise-to-data generation and modular reconstruction of, images or videos. Concurrently, evolutionary algorithms employ optimization methods inspired by biological principles to refine sets of numerical parameters encoding potential solutions to rugged objective functions. Our research reveals a fundamental connection between diffusion models and evolutionary algorithms through their shared underlying generative mechanisms: both methods generate high-quality samples via iterative refinement on random initial distributions. By employing deep learning-based diffusion models as generative models across diverse evolutionary tasks and iteratively refining diffusion models with heuristically acquired databases, we can iteratively sample potentially better-adapted offspring parameters, integrating them into successive generations of the diffusion model. This approach achieves efficient convergence toward high-fitness parameters while maintaining explorative diversity. Diffusion models introduce enhanced memory capabilities into evolutionary algorithms, retaining historical information across generations and leveraging subtle data correlations to generate refined samples. We elevate evolutionary algorithms from procedures with shallow heuristics to frameworks with deep memory. By deploying classifier-free guidance for conditional sampling at the parameter level, we achieve precise control over evolutionary search dynamics to further specific genotypical, phenotypical, or population-wide traits. Our framework marks a major heuristic and algorithmic transition, offering increased flexibility, precision, and control in evolutionary optimization processes.

Essay on "Heuristically Adaptive Diffusion-Model Evolutionary Strategy"

The paper "Heuristically Adaptive Diffusion-Model Evolutionary Strategy" introduces a novel paradigm in the application of diffusion models (DMs) to evolutionary algorithms (EAs), aiming to enhance algorithmic efficiency and control in complex optimization tasks. It presents a comprehensive framework for integrating DMs into EAs by utilizing the inherent capabilities of adaptive sampling, conditioning, and learning from previous generational data.

The authors begin by establishing a clear theoretical connection between DMs and EAs. Unlike traditional EAs, which often rely on heuristic, population-driven methods such as selection, recombination, and mutation, the authors propose a model-free, adaptive approach based on DMs. This approach, termed Heuristically Adaptive Diffusion-Model Evolutionary Strategy (HADES), leverages the step-wise denoising process inherent to DMs—a process analogous to biological development—and repurposes it for generative sampling of high-quality potential solutions.

Key Methodological Contributions

A significant methodological innovation is the use of classifier-free guidance in DMs. By implementing this, the authors introduce a multi-objective optimization framework, Conditional, Heuristically-Adaptive ReguLarized Evolutionary Strategy through Diffusion (CHARLES-D). Unlike conventional optimization paradigms, CHARLES-D can bias the search dynamics of evolutionary algorithms towards specific target traits, thus offering unprecedented control over parameter space exploration.

The paper details how DMs serve as a model-free, associative memory that retains and refines historical generational data, capturing complex correlations within the parameters through iterative refinement. This associative trait is reminiscent of Hebbian learning, offering a sophisticated way to bias genetic sampling based on past evolutionary performance.

Numerical Experiments and Results

The experimental setup establishes HADES and CHARLES-D as competitive approaches compared to mainstream EAs. The dual application across two-parameter toy models like the double-peak problem and complex landscapes like the Rastrigin task demonstrates substantial improvements in convergence rates and solution exploration.

Critically, the novel conditioning abilities of CHARLES-D were effectively demonstrated through case studies on reinforcement learning tasks, such as the cart-pole balancing problem. Here, the authors highlight how genotype-phenotype mappings can dynamically be steered towards desired behavioral outcomes without altering the underlying fitness function, signifying a potential step towards more biologically inspired models of evolutionary intelligence.

Implications and Future Directions

This research posits DMs as an advanced intermediary in genetic evolution, likening their generative capacity to genomic processes that encode not just fixed phenotypic solutions, but an adaptable repertoire of gene expressions. This conceptual advancement aligns with emerging views in developmental biology, reinterpreting genetic evolution as a form of dynamic memory and problem-solving across scales.

The implications are multifaceted. Practically, this provides a versatile tool for complex, multi-objective optimization tasks spanning a range of industries from computational biology to artificial intelligence. Theoretically, it suggests a new pathway connecting AI and biological models of evolution, offering insights into how intelligence and problem-solving might be universally mechanistic, grounded in generative, memory-driven processes.

Future research could enhance this framework by addressing the interaction between model architecture, population parameters, and real-world task complexity—potentially extending the general applicability of this approach to discrete parameter spaces or more nuanced evolutionary dynamics. Additionally, exploring the implicit bias introduced by DM conditioning could yield insights into directing evolutionary search without sacrificing diversity—a key challenge in multi-objective and real-world optimizations. These directions promise to further bridge the realms of artificial intelligence and biological evolution, fostering deeper understanding and technological innovation.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Benedikt Hartl (8 papers)
  2. Yanbo Zhang (31 papers)
  3. Hananel Hazan (13 papers)
  4. Michael Levin (90 papers)