Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Programmable Quantum Processors: Equivalence and Learning (2411.02289v1)

Published 4 Nov 2024 in quant-ph

Abstract: In the first part of the work, the equivalence of quantum deterministic and probabilistic processors was investigated. A programmable quantum processor is a device able to transform input data states in a desired way. Deterministic equivalence as well as three types of probabilistic equivalences - strong, weak, and structural - were defined. Necessary and sufficient conditions for deterministic and structural equivalence of unitarily related processors were discovered. Equivalence of deterministic SWAP processor for two-dimensional data and two-dimensional program space was completely solved. It was found that spans of operators of structurally equivalent processors are identical. Relations between types of individual equivalences were also examined. In the second part, robustness of probabilistic storing and retrieval device (PSAR), originally optimized for implementing a phase gate, to noise was examined - specifically to depolarization and phase damping. In the case of a depolarizing channel mixed with a unitary channel, the device implements noisy channel with the probability that decreases with an increasing number of times the given channel is applied. In the case of the phase damping channel, the device implements noisy channel with the same probability as the original PSAR device optimized for phase gate. Concrete implementations - through the Vidal-Masanes-Cirac scheme and virtual qudit - were examined. Vidal-Masanes-Cirac gives the same result for both noisy channels which is better than the result from PSAR. Implementation through virtual qudit for depolarization yields worse probability of successful measurement than Vidal-Masanes-Cirac. However, it is still better than the probability for PSAR. Probability of successful measurement obtained for phase damping implemented through virtual qudit is the same as for Vidal-Masanes-Cirac and PSAR.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.