Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
149 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
9 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Identifiability Analysis of Linear ODE Systems with Hidden Confounders (2410.21917v2)

Published 29 Oct 2024 in stat.ML and cs.LG

Abstract: The identifiability analysis of linear Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) systems is a necessary prerequisite for making reliable causal inferences about these systems. While identifiability has been well studied in scenarios where the system is fully observable, the conditions for identifiability remain unexplored when latent variables interact with the system. This paper aims to address this gap by presenting a systematic analysis of identifiability in linear ODE systems incorporating hidden confounders. Specifically, we investigate two cases of such systems. In the first case, latent confounders exhibit no causal relationships, yet their evolution adheres to specific functional forms, such as polynomial functions of time $t$. Subsequently, we extend this analysis to encompass scenarios where hidden confounders exhibit causal dependencies, with the causal structure of latent variables described by a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). The second case represents a more intricate variation of the first case, prompting a more comprehensive identifiability analysis. Accordingly, we conduct detailed identifiability analyses of the second system under various observation conditions, including both continuous and discrete observations from single or multiple trajectories. To validate our theoretical results, we perform a series of simulations, which support and substantiate our findings.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (47)
  1. Causality, mediation and time: a dynamic viewpoint. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 175(4):831–861, 2012.
  2. Sparsity in continuous-depth neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:901–914, 2022.
  3. Beyond predictions in neural odes: Identification and interventions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.12430, 2021.
  4. M.-C. Anisiu. Lotka, volterra and their model. Didáctica mathematica, 32(01), 2014.
  5. R. Bellman and K. J. Åström. On structural identifiability. Mathematical biosciences, 7(3-4):329–339, 1970.
  6. Neural graphical modelling in continuous-time: consistency guarantees and algorithms. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  7. H. G. Bock. Recent advances in parameteridentification techniques for ode. In Numerical Treatment of Inverse Problems in Differential and Integral Equations: Proceedings of an International Workshop, Heidelberg, Fed. Rep. of Germany, August 30—September 3, 1982, pages 95–121. Springer, 1983.
  8. Inference of chemical reaction networks. Chemical Engineering Science, 63(4):862–873, 2008.
  9. I. Bzhikhatlov and S. Perepelkina. Research of robot model behaviour depending on model parameters using physic engines bullet physics and ode. In 2017 International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM), pages 1–4. IEEE, 2017.
  10. Triad constraints for learning causal structure of latent variables. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  11. Fritl: A hybrid method for causal discovery in the presence of latent confounders. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.14238, 2021.
  12. G. Craciun and M. Feinberg. Multiple equilibria in complex chemical reaction networks: I. the injectivity property. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 65(5):1526–1546, 2005.
  13. E. Dockner. Differential games in economics and management science. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  14. B. Gargash and D. Mital. A necessary and sufficient condition of global structural identifiability of compartmental models. Computers in biology and medicine, 10(4):237–242, 1980.
  15. K. Glover and J. Willems. Parametrizations of linear dynamical systems: Canonical forms and identifiability. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6):640–646, 1974.
  16. Ode analysis of biological systems. Formal Methods for Dynamical Systems: 13th International School on Formal Methods for the Design of Computer, Communication, and Software Systems, SFM 2013, Bertinoro, Italy, June 17-22, 2013. Advanced Lectures, pages 29–62, 2013.
  17. M. Grewal and K. Glover. Identifiability of linear and nonlinear dynamical systems. IEEE Transactions on automatic control, 21(6):833–837, 1976.
  18. N. Hansen and A. Sokol. Causal interpretation of stochastic differential equations. Electronic Journal of Probability, 19:1–24, 2014.
  19. Estimation of causal effects using linear non-gaussian causal models with hidden variables. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 49(2):362–378, 2008.
  20. Latent hierarchical causal structure discovery with rank constraints. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:5549–5561, 2022.
  21. R. I. Jennrich. Asymptotic properties of non-linear least squares estimators. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 40(2):633–643, 1969.
  22. D. Kaltenpoth and J. Vreeken. Causal discovery with hidden confounders using the algorithmic markov condition. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 1016–1026. PMLR, 2023.
  23. Two-grid quasilinearization approach to odes with applications to model problems in physics and mechanics. Computer Physics Communications, 181(3):663–670, 2010.
  24. V. Mandelzweig and F. Tabakin. Quasilinearization approach to nonlinear problems in physics with application to nonlinear odes. Computer Physics Communications, 141(2):268–281, 2001.
  25. From ordinary differential equations to structural causal models: the deterministic case. In 29th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2013), pages 440–448. AUAI Press, 2013.
  26. J. Pearl. Causality. Cambridge university press, 2009.
  27. Comparing different ode modelling approaches for gene regulatory networks. Journal of theoretical biology, 261(4):511–530, 2009.
  28. Identifiability analysis of linear ordinary differential equation systems with a single trajectory. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 430:127260, 2022.
  29. Estimating parameters and hidden variables in non-linear state-space models based on odes for biological networks inference. Bioinformatics, 23(23):3209–3216, 2007.
  30. From deterministic odes to dynamic structural causal models. In 34th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2018), pages 114–123. Curran Associates, Inc., 2018.
  31. Toward causal representation learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(5):612–634, 2021.
  32. Linear causal disentanglement via interventions. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 32540–32560. PMLR, 2023.
  33. Benchmarking of numerical integration methods for ode models of biological systems. Scientific reports, 11(1):2696, 2021.
  34. Identifiability of linear and linear-in-parameters dynamical systems from a single trajectory. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 13(4):1792–1815, 2014.
  35. H. Straubing. A combinatorial proof of the cayley-hamilton theorem. Discrete Mathematics, 43(2-3):273–279, 1983.
  36. Deep learning of biological models from data: applications to ode models. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 83:1–19, 2021.
  37. G. Teschl. Ordinary differential equations and dynamical systems, volume 140. American Mathematical Soc., 2012.
  38. A. Tsoularis. On some important ordinary differential equations of dynamic economics. Recent developments in the solution of nonlinear differential equations, pages 147–153, 2021.
  39. P. N. Tu. Dynamical systems: an introduction with applications in economics and biology. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  40. T. Verma and J. Pearl. Causal networks: Semantics and expressiveness. In Machine intelligence and pattern recognition, volume 9, pages 69–76. Elsevier, 1990.
  41. Generator identification for linear sdes with additive and multiplicative noise. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  42. Identifiability and asymptotics in learning homogeneous linear ode systems from discrete observations. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25(154):1–50, 2024.
  43. T. A. Weber. Optimal control theory with applications in economics. MIT press, 2011.
  44. Generalized independent noise condition for estimating latent variable causal graphs. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:14891–14902, 2020.
  45. Identification of linear non-gaussian latent hierarchical structure. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 24370–24387. PMLR, 2022.
  46. Sieve estimation of constant and time-varying coefficients in nonlinear ordinary differential equation models by considering both numerical error and measurement error. Annals of statistics, 38(4):2351, 2010.
  47. Symplectic ode-net: Learning hamiltonian dynamics with control. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.12077, 2019.

Summary

  • The paper presents a novel framework for determining identifiability in linear ODE systems with hidden confounders, extending standard analyses of fully observable cases.
  • It transforms systems with latent variables into equivalent fully observable models through polynomial time transformations and DAG-based structures.
  • Simulation results reveal that precise parameter estimates hinge on correctly modeling latent dependencies, thereby enhancing causal inference in dynamic systems.

Identifiability Analysis of Linear ODE Systems with Hidden Confounders

The presented paper, authored by researchers at the University of Melbourne and the University of California, San Diego, provides an in-depth exploration of the identifiability of linear Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) systems that incorporate hidden confounders. The principal aim is to extend the current understanding of identifiability in these systems beyond the field of fully observable systems.

Identifiability is a crucial preliminary step in making robust causal inferences from ODEs, which are extensively used to model dynamic systems across various scientific fields such as physics, biology, and economics. While identifiability is extensively researched in fully observable systems, the presence of latent variables introduces significant complexity to this problem. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a framework to analyze the identifiability of linear ODE systems with hidden confounders.

The authors explore two primary scenarios within this framework. The first involves systems with independent latent confounders, where the evolution of these confounders follows predefined functional forms. They propose that identifiability can be determined when latent transformations like polynomial expressions of time are considered. In particular, they place emphasis on how identifiability is influenced by augmenting the observable system with additional parameters to account for the latent confounders.

The second, more complex scenario generalizes the first by introducing causally interdependent latent confounders, whose causal structures are captured by Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs). In these systems, the authors articulate a novel identifiability criterion leveraging the system's structure and the dynamics imposed by DAGs. They provide thorough analyses of systems under varied observation conditions—be it continuous or discrete, across single or multiple trajectories.

An interesting methodological contribution of this work is the transformation of systems with hidden confounders into equivalent fully observable systems. By doing so, they enable the application of existing identifiability results for standard homogeneous linear ODE systems. This approach allows for the derivation of identifiability conditions based on whether the augmented system, now devoid of latent variables, spans the full state space.

The authors support their theoretical findings with simulations, which substantiate their proposed identifiability conditions. The simulation results show that correct parameter estimates are often sensitive to the underlying structural assumptions being met. For instance, the presence of DAG in latent variables ensures distinguishability of system trajectories, emphasizing the importance of correctly modeling latent dependencies.

The implications of this work are vast, affecting both the theoretical understanding and practical applications of ODE systems in modeling causality. The theoretical contributions provide a foundation for designing estimators in latent ODE models, potentially influencing experimental designs in fields where controlled intervention on latent variables is possible. Practically, these results could be instrumental in improving the estimates of dynamic models in various applications where unobservable dynamics play a critical role.

This work elegantly bridges a significant gap in the identifiability of ODE systems with hidden confounders, offering a methodology that promises to enhance the reliability of causal inferences in dynamic systems. Future directions may extend this work to nonlinear systems or stochastic differential equations, further broadening the impact of these findings in the field of causal inference.