Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Precise and Dexterous Robotic Manipulation via Human-in-the-Loop Reinforcement Learning (2410.21845v2)

Published 29 Oct 2024 in cs.RO and cs.AI

Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) holds great promise for enabling autonomous acquisition of complex robotic manipulation skills, but realizing this potential in real-world settings has been challenging. We present a human-in-the-loop vision-based RL system that demonstrates impressive performance on a diverse set of dexterous manipulation tasks, including dynamic manipulation, precision assembly, and dual-arm coordination. Our approach integrates demonstrations and human corrections, efficient RL algorithms, and other system-level design choices to learn policies that achieve near-perfect success rates and fast cycle times within just 1 to 2.5 hours of training. We show that our method significantly outperforms imitation learning baselines and prior RL approaches, with an average 2x improvement in success rate and 1.8x faster execution. Through extensive experiments and analysis, we provide insights into the effectiveness of our approach, demonstrating how it learns robust, adaptive policies for both reactive and predictive control strategies. Our results suggest that RL can indeed learn a wide range of complex vision-based manipulation policies directly in the real world within practical training times. We hope this work will inspire a new generation of learned robotic manipulation techniques, benefiting both industrial applications and research advancements. Videos and code are available at our project website https://hil-serl.github.io/.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (52)
  1. B. Aceituno-Cabezas and A. Rodriguez. A global quasi-dynamic model for contact-trajectory optimization. In RSS, 2020.
  2. Feedback Systems: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Princeton University Press, USA, 2008. ISBN 0691135762.
  3. On the sample complexity of reinforcement learning with a generative model, 2012. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6461.
  4. Efficient online reinforcement learning with offline data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02948, 2023.
  5. A finite time analysis of temporal difference learning with linear function approximation. In Sébastien Bubeck, Vianney Perchet, and Philippe Rigollet, editors, Proceedings of the 31st Conference On Learning Theory, volume 75 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 1691–1692. PMLR, 06–09 Jul 2018.
  6. Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control, 2023a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15818.
  7. Rt-1: Robotics transformer for real-world control at scale, 2023b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.06817.
  8. Sequential composition of dynamically dexterous robot behaviors. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 18(6):534–555, 1999. 10.1177/02783649922066385.
  9. Insert-one: One-shot robust visual-force servoing for novel object insertion with 6-dof tracking. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2024), October 2024. URL https://www.merl.com/publications/TR2024-137.
  10. Path integral guided policy search, 2016. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.00529.
  11. Visual dexterity: In-hand reorientation of novel and complex object shapes. Science Robotics, 8(84):eadc9244, 2023. 10.1126/scirobotics.adc9244. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/scirobotics.adc9244.
  12. Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04137.
  13. Open X-Embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and RT-X models. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Yokohama, Japan, 2024.
  14. Jinda Cui and J. Trinkle. Toward next-generation learned robot manipulation. Science Robotics, 6, 2021.
  15. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 248–255, 2009. 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848.
  16. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929.
  17. Is a good representation sufficient for sample efficient reinforcement learning?, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.03016.
  18. Vision-language models as success detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07280, 2023.
  19. Minedojo: Building open-ended embodied agents with internet-scale knowledge. In NeurIPS, 2022. URL http://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/hash/74a67268c5cc5910f64938cac4526a90-Abstract-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.html.
  20. See, feel, act: Hierarchical learning for complex manipulation skills with multisensory fusion. Science Robotics, 4(26):eaav3123, 2019. 10.1126/scirobotics.aav3123. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/scirobotics.aav3123.
  21. Reverse curriculum generation for reinforcement learning. In Sergey Levine, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Ken Goldberg, editors, Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning, volume 78 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 482–495. PMLR, 13–15 Nov 2017.
  22. Automatic goal generation for reinforcement learning agents, 2018. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.06366.
  23. Variational inverse control with events: A general framework for data-driven reward definition. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018.
  24. A review of the high-mix, low-volume manufacturing industry. Applied Sciences, 13(3), 2023. ISSN 2076-3417. 10.3390/app13031687. URL https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/3/1687.
  25. Reset-free reinforcement learning via multi-task learning: Learning dexterous manipulation behaviors without human intervention. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2021, Xi’an, China, May 30 - June 5, 2021, pages 6664–6671. IEEE, 2021. 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561384. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561384.
  26. Soft actor-critic: Off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1861–1870. PMLR, 2018.
  27. Deep residual learning for image recognition, 2015.
  28. Texplore: real-time sample-efficient reinforcement learning for robots. Machine learning, 90:385–429, 2013.
  29. Feedback control of the pusher-slider system: A story of hybrid and underactuated contact dynamics, 2016. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.08268.
  30. Imitation bootstrapped reinforcement learning, 2024a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02198.
  31. REBOOT: reuse data for bootstrapping efficient real-world dexterous manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.03322, 2024b.
  32. Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robots. Science Robotics, 4(26):eaau5872, 2019. 10.1126/scirobotics.aau5872. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/scirobotics.aau5872.
  33. Dynamical movement primitives: Learning attractor models for motor behaviors. Neural Computation, 25(2):328–373, 2013. 10.1162/NECO_a_00393.
  34. Is q-learning provably efficient? In S. Bengio, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, K. Grauman, N. Cesa-Bianchi, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 31. Curran Associates, Inc., 2018. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2018/file/d3b1fb02964aa64e257f9f26a31f72cf-Paper.pdf.
  35. Provably efficient reinforcement learning with linear function approximation. In Jacob Abernethy and Shivani Agarwal, editors, Proceedings of Thirty Third Conference on Learning Theory, volume 125 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 2137–2143. PMLR, 09–12 Jul 2020. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v125/jin20a.html.
  36. Robust deformation model approximation for robotic cable manipulation. In 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 6586–6593, 2019. 10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8968157.
  37. Contact pose identification for peg-in-hole assembly under uncertainties. In 2021 American Control Conference (ACC), pages 48–53, 2021. 10.23919/ACC50511.2021.9482981.
  38. Applying lean principles for high product variety and low volumes: some issues and propositions. Logistics Information Management, 10:5–13, 1997. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:110348308.
  39. Residual reinforcement learning for robot control. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 6023–6029, 2019. 10.1109/ICRA.2019.8794127.
  40. Qt-opt: Scalable deep reinforcement learning for vision-based robotic manipulation, 2018. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.10293.
  41. Mt-opt: Continuous multi-task robotic reinforcement learning at scale, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.08212.
  42. Near-optimal reinforcement learning in polynominal time. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML ’98, page 260–268, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1998. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. ISBN 1558605568.
  43. Hg-dagger: Interactive imitation learning with human experts. 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 8077–8083, 2018. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:52939433.
  44. Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09246.
  45. Benchmarking protocols for evaluating small parts robotic assembly systems. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5(2):883–889, 2020. 10.1109/LRA.2020.2965869.
  46. Big transfer (bit): General visual representation learning, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11370.
  47. Robot motor skill coordination with em-based reinforcement learning. In 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 3232–3237, 2010. 10.1109/IROS.2010.5649089.
  48. Demonstrating A walk in the park: Learning to walk in 20 minutes with model-free reinforcement learning. In Kostas E. Bekris, Kris Hauser, Sylvia L. Herbert, and Jingjin Yu, editors, Robotics: Science and Systems XIX, Daegu, Republic of Korea, July 10-14, 2023, 2023. 10.15607/RSS.2023.XIX.056. URL https://doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2023.XIX.056.
  49. Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain. Science Robotics, 5(47):eabc5986, 2020. 10.1126/scirobotics.abc5986. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/scirobotics.abc5986.
  50. End-to-end training of deep visuomotor policies. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 17:39:1–39:40, 2016. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v17/15-522.html.
  51. MURAL: meta-learning uncertainty-aware rewards for outcome-driven reinforcement learning. In Marina Meila and Tong Zhang, editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2021, 18-24 July 2021, Virtual Event, volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 6346–6356. PMLR, 2021. URL http://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/li21g.html.
  52. Learning high-speed flight in the wild. Science Robotics, 6(59):eabg5810, 2021. 10.1126/scirobotics.abg5810. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/scirobotics.abg5810.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Jianlan Luo (22 papers)
  2. Charles Xu (12 papers)
  3. Jeffrey Wu (8 papers)
  4. Sergey Levine (531 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

Precise and Dexterous Robotic Manipulation via Human-in-the-Loop Reinforcement Learning

The integration of reinforcement learning (RL) with human-in-the-loop methodologies presents an innovative framework for robotic manipulation, as demonstrated in this paper conducted by researchers from UC Berkeley. The paper introduces the Human-in-the-Loop Sample Efficient Robotic Learning (HIL-SERL) system, which leverages vision-based RL to acquire a variety of complex robotic manipulation skills. HIL-SERL tackles foundational challenges in robotic manipulation, such as dynamic interaction, precision, and multi-actuator coordination, using a concerted approach involving human intervention, state-of-the-art RL algorithms, and strategic system design.

Methodology and Key Contributions

One of the pivotal aspects of the proposed system is the integration of human interventions with RL training. By employing a pretrained visual backbone within the RL framework, the system addresses optimization stability, a common issue in vision-based RL settings. The system uses a sample-efficient off-policy RL algorithm based on RLPD, which incorporates human demonstrations and corrections, thus minimizing sample complexity—a persistent hurdle in real-world RL applications.

Human involvement is a significant component of the training process, providing corrective interventions during policy execution. These interventions aid in overcoming exploration inefficiencies inherent to RL, particularly for tasks that are challenging to initiate from scratch due to their complexity and the requirement for precise control strategies.

The system successfully addresses tasks previously deemed impractical to train with RL in real-world environments. It achieves a remarkable average improvement of 101% in success rates compared to imitation learning baselines and demonstrates a 1.8-fold increase in cycle speed. Noteworthy results are attained in challenging tasks like dynamic Jenga piece extraction, multi-arm coordination for timing belt assembly, and intricate object flipping. These tasks necessitate different control strategies, reflecting the flexibility and adaptiveness of the HIL-SERL framework.

Empirical Findings

The HIL-SERL framework achieves up to near-perfect success rates with relatively short training times of 1 to 2.5 hours. This efficiency is groundbreaking when considering the complexities involved in tasks such as dual-arm coordination and precision manipulation. The system not only outperforms imitation learning but also establishes that RL is viable for acquiring complex, vision-based manipulation policies directly in the real world within practical temporal constraints.

In terms of quantitative performance, the paper demonstrates that the policies trained using HIL-SERL significantly surpass those derived from imitation learning. For instance, the system learns to execute precision-intensive maneuvers like RAM insertion with improvements in success rate by 245%, whereas tasks like USB insertion see enhancements by 285%.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

Theoretically, this paper offers insights into the design of RL systems capable of real-world robotic manipulation tasks. It suggests the potential for RL to learn both reactive and predictive control strategies effectively. Practically, the results indicate a feasible pathway for deploying autonomous robotic systems in high-stakes environments like industrial assembly lines and high-mix low-volume production facilities, where adaptive, efficient skill acquisition is critical.

Future Directions

Despite the significant contributions, the research acknowledges certain limitations. Generalization across significantly varied environments and tasks, especially with longer horizons, remains an area ripe for exploration. Future research can focus on enhancing the adaptability and training efficiency of such systems, potentially through pretraining models for foundational manipulation skills or employing language-vision models for automatic task segmentation.

The paper's findings suggest transformative potential for robotic manipulation, positioning HIL-SERL as a pivotal step towards general-purpose, deployable robotic systems. As the field progresses, integrating broader datasets and leveraging foundation models could further extend the applicability of such RL frameworks to even more complex, autonomous manipulation tasks.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com