Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Semantic Search Evaluation (2410.21549v1)

Published 28 Oct 2024 in cs.IR and cs.CL
Semantic Search Evaluation

Abstract: We propose a novel method for evaluating the performance of a content search system that measures the semantic match between a query and the results returned by the search system. We introduce a metric called "on-topic rate" to measure the percentage of results that are relevant to the query. To achieve this, we design a pipeline that defines a golden query set, retrieves the top K results for each query, and sends calls to GPT 3.5 with formulated prompts. Our semantic evaluation pipeline helps identify common failure patterns and goals against the metric for relevance improvements.

Semantic Search Evaluation: A Metric-Driven Approach

The paper by Zheng et al. introduces a robust method for evaluating content search systems that leverage semantic matching capabilities, with a focus on determining the semantic relevance of search results to user queries. This work addresses the need for a reliable offline evaluation framework amidst the challenges posed by the indirect and dynamic nature of existing engagement metrics. Central to this approach is the novel "on-topic rate" metric, which quantifies the relevance of search results, providing a tangible measure of performance for content search models.

Methodology and Contributions

In their approach, the authors design a comprehensive semantic evaluation pipeline centered on Generative AI, specifically utilizing GPT-3.5 to enhance evaluation quality. The paper provides a clear task formulation where the search engine returns a list of documents in response to a user query, necessitating an evaluation method that accurately reflects semantic relevance beyond keyword matching.

Key contributions include:

  1. Metric Definition - On-Topic Rate (OTR): This metric evaluates how well the search results align with the query's intent, which is calculated using the top K retrieved documents' relevance. OTR provides a direct and precise measurement for offline evaluation, which traditional metrics like Mean Average Precision (MAP) and normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (nDCG) may not fully address.
  2. Semantic Evaluation Pipeline: The authors detail the process of semantic evaluation using a carefully constructed prompt system for GPT-3.5, which involves:
    • Creating a query set composed of "golden set" and "open set" queries.
    • Generating search results and forming prompts for LLM processing.
    • Computing OTR metrics based on LLM feedback, yielding binary decisions and relevance scores.
  3. Human Evaluation and Validation: To validate the pipeline's output, the paper incorporates human evaluation, achieving around 81.72% consistency with expert human annotators. Furthermore, a validation set including diverse query types ensures the pipeline's responsiveness to varying search intents, achieving 94.5% accuracy.

Implications and Speculations on Future Developments

The implementation of the semantic evaluation pipeline has practical implications for improving content search systems such as LinkedIn's. By offering a more reliable offline benchmark, this method could significantly enhance the training and selection of machine learning models, ultimately leading to more relevant search results and an improved user experience.

Theoretically, this approach aligns with a broader shift towards leveraging LLMs in semantic search and information retrieval tasks. As LLMs continue to evolve, their capacity to discern semantic nuances can potentially refine metrics like OTR, allowing for even more sophisticated search systems. Future work may explore integrating real-time feedback mechanisms or iterative learning models to further enhance semantic evaluation performance.

In conclusion, the work by Zheng et al. presents a meaningful advancement in the evaluation of semantic search systems, introducing a metric that bridges the gap between user intent and document relevance. By leveraging Generative AI, the paper sets a precedent for future research endeavors focused on refining search and retrieval methodologies in an increasingly data-driven world.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)
  1. The relationship between IR effectiveness measures and user satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 773–774.
  2. Multi-objective ranking optimization for product search using stochastic label aggregation. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 373–383.
  3. Practice and Challenges in Building a Business-oriented Search Engine Quality Metric. In Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 3295–3299.
  4. Meta-evaluation of online and offline web search evaluation metrics. In Proceedings of the 40th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. 15–24.
  5. Top challenges from the first practical online controlled experiments summit. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 21, 1 (2019), 20–35.
  6. Scott B Huffman and Michael Hochster. 2007. How well does result relevance predict session satisfaction?. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 567–574.
  7. Peeking at a/b tests: Why it matters, and what to do about it. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1517–1525.
  8. On application of learning to rank for e-commerce search. In Proceedings of the 40th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. 475–484.
  9. Corpuslm: Towards a unified language model on corpus for knowledge-intensive tasks. In Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 26–37.
  10. When does relevance mean usefulness and user satisfaction in web search?. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 463–472.
  11. Llm4eval: Large language model for evaluation in ir. In Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 3040–3043.
  12. Report on the 1st Workshop on Large Language Model for Evaluation in Information Retrieval (LLM4Eval 2024) at SIGIR 2024. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.05388 (2024).
  13. LLMJudge: LLMs for Relevance Judgments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.08896 (2024).
  14. Mark Sanderson et al. 2010. Test collection based evaluation of information retrieval systems. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval 4, 4 (2010), 247–375.
  15. LARR: Large Language Model Aided Real-time Scene Recommendation with Semantic Understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11523 (2024).
  16. How well do offline metrics predict online performance of product ranking models?. In SIGIR 2023. https://www.amazon.science/publications/how-well-do-offline-metrics-predict-online-performance-of-product-ranking-models
  17. A setwise approach for effective and highly efficient zero-shot ranking with large language models. In Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 38–47.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Chujie Zheng (35 papers)
  2. Jeffrey Wang (3 papers)
  3. Shuqian Albee Zhang (1 paper)
  4. Anand Kishore (1 paper)
  5. Siddharth Singh (42 papers)