Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Pro
GPT-5
GPT-4o
DeepSeek R1 via Azure
2000 character limit reached

Energy-Based Diffusion Language Models for Text Generation (2410.21357v4)

Published 28 Oct 2024 in cs.CL and cs.LG

Abstract: Despite remarkable progress in autoregressive LLMs, alternative generative paradigms beyond left-to-right generation are still being actively explored. Discrete diffusion models, with the capacity for parallel generation, have recently emerged as a promising alternative. Unfortunately, these models still underperform the autoregressive counterparts, with the performance gap increasing when reducing the number of sampling steps. Our analysis reveals that this degradation is a consequence of an imperfect approximation used by diffusion models. In this work, we propose Energy-based Diffusion LLM (EDLM), an energy-based model operating at the full sequence level for each diffusion step, introduced to improve the underlying approximation used by diffusion models. More specifically, we introduce an EBM in a residual form, and show that its parameters can be obtained by leveraging a pretrained autoregressive model or by finetuning a bidirectional transformer via noise contrastive estimation. We also propose an efficient generation algorithm via parallel important sampling. Comprehensive experiments on LLMing benchmarks show that our model can consistently outperform state-of-the-art diffusion models by a significant margin, and approaches autoregressive models' perplexity. We further show that, without any generation performance drop, our framework offers a 1.3$\times$ sampling speedup over existing diffusion models. Reproduced code is available at https://github.com/MinkaiXu/Energy-Diffusion-LLM.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (50)
  1. Structured denoising diffusion models in discrete state-spaces. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021.
  2. Scheduled sampling for sequence prediction with recurrent neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 28, 2015.
  3. Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, 2020.
  4. A continuous time framework for discrete denoising models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
  5. Generative flows on discrete state-spaces: Enabling multimodal flows with applications to protein co-design. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=kQwSbv0BR4.
  6. On contrastive divergence learning. In International workshop on artificial intelligence and statistics, pp.  33–40. PMLR, 2005.
  7. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(240):1–113, 2023.
  8. A discourse-aware attention model for abstractive summarization of long documents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.05685, 2018.
  9. Residual energy-based models for text generation. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=B1l4SgHKDH.
  10. Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021.
  11. Continuous diffusion for categorical data. ArXiv, abs/2211.15089, 2022.
  12. Discrete flow matching. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15595, 2024.
  13. Alan E Gelfand. Gibbs sampling. Journal of the American statistical Association, 95(452):1300–1304, 2000.
  14. Openwebtext corpus. http://Skylion007.github.io/OpenWebTextCorpus, 2019.
  15. Bayesian flow networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07037, 2023.
  16. Likelihood-based diffusion language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  17. Noise-contrastive estimation: A new estimation principle for unnormalized statistical models. In Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pp.  297–304. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2010.
  18. John Hammersley. Monte carlo methods. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
  19. Ssd-lm: Semi-autoregressive simplex-based diffusion language model for text generation and modular control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.17432, 2022.
  20. Geoffrey E Hinton. Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Neural computation, 14(8):1771–1800, 2002.
  21. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020.
  22. Argmax flows and multinomial diffusion: Learning categorical distributions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:12454–12465, 2021.
  23. Autoregressive diffusion models. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=Lm8T39vLDTE.
  24. A tutorial on energy-based learning. Predicting structured data, 1(0), 2006.
  25. Discrete predictor-corrector diffusion models for image synthesis. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=VM8batVBWvg.
  26. Discrete diffusion modeling by estimating the ratios of the data distribution. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  32819–32848. PMLR, 2024.
  27. Noise contrastive estimation and negative sampling for conditional models: Consistency and statistical efficiency. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp.  3698–3707, 2018.
  28. Matt Mahoney. Large text compression benchmark. 2006. URL https://www.mattmahoney.net/dc/text.html.
  29. Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank. Computational linguistics, 19(2):313–330, 1993.
  30. Pointer sentinel mixture models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07843, 2016.
  31. Sebastian Nowozin. Debiasing evidence approximations: On importance-weighted autoencoders and jackknife variational inference. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=HyZoi-WRb.
  32. Art B. Owen. Monte Carlo theory, methods and examples. https://artowen.su.domains/mc/, 2013.
  33. The lambada dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse context. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06031, 2016.
  34. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019.
  35. Code llama: Open foundation models for code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12950, 2023.
  36. Simple and effective masked diffusion language models, 2024.
  37. Step-unrolled denoising autoencoders for text generation. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=T0GpzBQ1Fg6.
  38. Simplified and generalized masked diffusion for discrete data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04329, 2024.
  39. Training and inference on any-order autoregressive models the right way. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:2762–2775, 2022.
  40. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, 2015.
  41. Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution. In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019.
  42. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023.
  43. Discrete flows: Invertible generative models of discrete data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
  44. Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations. Nature, 625(7995):476–482, 2024.
  45. Attention is all you need. In NIPS, 2017.
  46. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24824–24837, 2022.
  47. Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. In Qun Liu and David Schlangen (eds.), Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, pp.  38–45, Online, October 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-demos.6.
  48. Character-level convolutional networks for text classification. Advances in neural information processing systems, 28, 2015.
  49. Improving and unifying discrete&continuous-time discrete denoising diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03701, 2024.
  50. Latent normalizing flows for discrete sequences. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  7673–7682. PMLR, 2019.

Summary

  • The paper proposes an Energy-based Diffusion Language Model that integrates sequence-level energy parameterization to enhance token prediction accuracy.
  • It employs parallel importance sampling to achieve a significant 1.3× speedup, reducing the computational demands of conventional diffusion methods.
  • Empirical evaluations demonstrate that EDLM attains competitive perplexity scores compared to state-of-the-art autoregressive models.

An Expert Review of "Energy-Based Diffusion LLMs for Text Generation"

The paper entitled "Energy-Based Diffusion LLMs for Text Generation" presents an innovative approach to address inherent limitations in discrete diffusion models for natural language generation. By augmenting diffusion models with energy-based modeling techniques, the authors propose a novel framework, named Energy-based Diffusion LLM (EDLM), aimed at enhancing the efficacy of token sequence predictions during the language generation process.

Overview and Key Contributions

The paper begins by recognizing the limitations of existing autoregressive (AR) models and various alternative generative paradigms, especially in their inflexibility and exposure bias. Despite advancements, discrete diffusion models have not surpassed AR models, partly due to the discrepancy in training and decoherence of the sampling distribution. The core insight of this paper lies in the realization that diffusion models suffer from a mismatch between their training and sampling distributions, mainly due to their independent token-wise predictions which disregard sequence-level correlations.

To mitigate these shortcomings, the authors introduce an energy-based model that operates across the entire sequence rather than at individual token levels. The proposed EDLM achieves this by integrating a residual form energy parameterization over pretrained diffusion models. This methodology introduces the use of pretrained AR models or bidirectional transformers as energy functions. Notably, EDLM facilitates greater sampling efficiency via parallel importance sampling, a key innovation that addresses the traditionally high computational demands of diffusion models.

The authors substantiate their claims with rigorous empirical evaluations across several language generation benchmarks. The experimental results demonstrate that EDLM consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art diffusion models, achieves competitive perplexity scores close to autoregressive models, and critically, offers a significant 1.3× speedup in sampling time over traditional diffusion-based approaches.

Implications and Future Directions

The introduction of an energy-based framework to augment diffusion LLMs presents significant implications for the field of text generation. By effectively marrying the strengths of energy-based modeling with diffusion processes, the approach offers new pathways to address the sampling accuracy and efficiency challenges that have long hindered the adoption of diffusion models.

Moreover, the paper opens several avenues for future research. Firstly, there remains a potential to further optimize the energy parameterization for even greater sampling speedups. Another promising direction could involve exploring the integration of this framework with other generative paradigms, such as variational autoencoders or generative adversarial networks. Furthermore, adapting the methodology for multi-modal generative tasks could see widespread application in environments where coherent cross-modal generation (e.g., text-to-image) is critical.

Conclusion

The Energy-Based Diffusion LLM presented in this paper represents a substantial innovation within text generation methodologies. By addressing the historic limitations of discrete diffusion models through energy-based techniques, the authors not only provide a competitive alternative to autoregressive LLMs but also set a transformative precedent for future research in efficient and effective parallel text generation solutions.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com