Simple analytical model describing the collective nonlinear response of an ensemble of two-level emitters weakly coupled to a waveguide (2410.21202v2)
Abstract: We model and investigate the collective nonlinear optical response of an ensemble of two-level emitters that are weakly coupled to a single-mode waveguide. Our approach generalizes the insight that photon-photon correlations in the light scattered by a single two-level emitter result from two-photon interference to the case of many emitters. Using our model, we study different configurations for probing the nonlinear response of the ensemble, e.g., through the waveguide or via external illumination, and derive analytical expressions for the second-order quantum coherence function, $g{(2)}(\tau)$, as well as for the squeezing spectrum of the output light in the waveguide, $S_\theta(\omega)$. For the transmission of resonant guided light, we recover the same predictions as previously made with far more involved theoretical models when analyzing experimental results regarding $g{(2)}(\tau)$ (Prasad et al. [1]) and $S_\theta(\omega)$ (Hinney et al. [2]). We also study the transmission of light that is detuned from the transition of the two-level emitter, a situation that we recently studied experimentally (Cordier et al. [3]). Our model predictions show how the collectively enhanced nonlinear response of weakly coupled emitters can be harnessed to generate non-classical states of light using ensembles ranging from a few to many emitters.
- R. H. Dicke, Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Processes, Physical Review 93, 99 (1954).
- M. Gross and S. Haroche, Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission, Physics Reports 93, 301 (1982).
- M. G. Benedict, Super-Radiance: Multiatomic Coherent Emission (CRC Press, 1996).
- D. F. Kornovan, A. S. Sheremet, and M. I. Petrov, Collective polaritonic modes in an array of two-level quantum emitters coupled to an optical nanofiber, Physical Review B 94, 245416 (2016).
- A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Albrecht, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Exponential Improvement in Photon Storage Fidelities Using Subradiance and “Selective Radiance” in Atomic Arrays, Physical Review X 7, 031024 (2017a).
- D. F. Kornovan, M. I. Petrov, and I. V. Iorsh, Transport and collective radiance in a basic quantum chiral optical model, Physical Review B 96, 115162 (2017).
- J. Dalibard and S. Reynaud, Correlation signals in resonance fluorescence : Interpretation via photon scattering amplitudes, Journal de Physique 44, 1337 (1983).
- E. Z. Casalengua, F. P. Laussy, and E. del Valle, Two photons everywhere (2024), arXiv:2402.14010 [quant-ph] .
- H. J. Kimble, M. Dagenais, and L. Mandel, Photon Antibunching in Resonance Fluorescence, Physical Review Letters 39, 691 (1977).
- P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Reviews of Modern Physics 87, 347 (2015).
- I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, and M. Toth, Solid-state single-photon emitters, Nature Photonics 10, 631 (2016).
- A. Heidmann and S. Reynaud, Squeezing in the many atom resonance fluorescence emitted in the forward direction : Application to photon noise reduction, Journal de Physique 46, 1937 (1985).
- J.-T. Shen and S. Fan, Strongly correlated multiparticle transport in one dimension through a quantum impurity, Physical Review A 76, 062709 (2007).
- B. L. Ng, C. H. Chow, and C. Kurtsiefer, Observation of the Mollow triplet from an optically confined single atom, Physical Review A 106, 063719 (2022).
- E. Z. Casalengua, E. del Valle, and F. P. Laussy, Two-photon correlations in detuned resonance fluorescence, Physica Scripta 98, 055104 (2023).
- D. Goncalves, M. W. Mitchell, and D. E. Chang, Unconventional quantum correlations of light emitted by a single atom in free space, Physical Review A 104, 013724 (2021).
- Near-field effects can typically be neglected when the atomic distances d𝑑ditalic_d are such that d≥λ/2𝑑𝜆2d\geq\lambda/2italic_d ≥ italic_λ / 2 [10].
- Our theory is in leading order in |Ω|/ΓΩΓ|\Omega|/\Gamma| roman_Ω | / roman_Γ as in [33]. Correction to our model are on the order Pin∝|Ω|2proportional-tosubscript𝑃insuperscriptΩ2P_{\mathrm{in}}\propto|\Omega|^{2}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_in end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∝ | roman_Ω | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for g2(τ)superscript𝑔2𝜏g^{2}(\tau)italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_τ ), and P2superscriptsubscript𝑃absent2P_{\mathrm{}}^{2}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for the squeezing spectrum.
- See Appendix B and [2] for more details.
- L. Mandel, Photon interference and correlation effects produced by independent quantum sources, Physical Review A 28, 929 (1983).
- A. N. Poddubny, Driven anti-Bragg subradiant correlations in waveguide quantum electrodynamics, Physical Review A 106, L031702 (2022).
- This approximation is well fulfilled for β≪1much-less-than𝛽1\beta\ll 1italic_β ≪ 1.
- The same arguments holds for Δ≠0Δ0\Delta\neq 0roman_Δ ≠ 0.