Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
149 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
9 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The green transition of firms: The role of evolutionary competition, adjustment costs, transition risk, and green technology progress (2410.20379v1)

Published 27 Oct 2024 in econ.TH

Abstract: We propose an evolutionary competition model to investigate the green transition of firms, highlighting the role of adjustment costs, dynamically adjusted transition risk, and green technology progress in this process. Firms base their decisions to adopt either green or brown technologies on relative performance. To incorporate the costs of switching to another technology into their decision-making process, we generalize the classical exponential replicator dynamics. Our global analysis reveals that increasing transition risk, e.g., by threatening to impose stricter environmental regulations, effectively incentivizes the green transition. Economic policy recommendations derived from our model further suggest maintaining high transition risk regardless of the industry's level of greenness. Subsidizing the costs of adopting green technologies can reduce the risk of a failed green transition. While advances in green technologies can amplify the effects of green policies, they do not completely eliminate the possibility of a failed green transition. Finally, evolutionary pressures favor the green transition when green technologies are profitable.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (47)
  1. Ahluwalia, M. (2017). The Business of Pricing Carbon How Companies are Pricing Carbon To Mitigate Risks and Prepare for a Low-Carbon Future. Arlington, VA: Center for Climate and Energy Solutions.
  2. Two sides of the same coin: Green Taxonomy alignment versus transition risk in financial portfolios. International Review of Financial Analysis 84, 102319.
  3. Allen, R. (2009). The british industrial revolution in global perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge, University Press.
  4. Adoption gaps of environmental adaptation technologies with public effects. Environmental and Resource Economics 83, 313–339.
  5. Should I stay or should I go? Carbon leakage and ETS in an evolutionary model. Energy Economics 103, 105561.
  6. Free allocation of emission permits to reduce carbon leakage: An evolutionary approach. In M. Jakob (Ed.), Handbook on Trade Policy and Climate Change, pp.  76–93. Berlin, Germany: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  7. Arthur, W. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal 99, 116–131.
  8. Market structure and multiproduct industries. Journal of Economic Literature 20, 1024–1048.
  9. Global pricing of carbon‐transition risk. The Journal of Finance 78, 3677–3754.
  10. Bowen, A. (2011). The case for carbon pricing. Policy brief. London, UK: Grantham Research Institute on Climate and the Environment.
  11. Brock, W. A. and C. H. Hommes (1997). A rational route to randomness. Econometrica 65(5), 1059–1095.
  12. Brock, W. A. and C. H. Hommes (1998). Heterogeneous beliefs and routes to chaos in a simple asset pricing model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 22(8-9), 1235–1274.
  13. Climate policy, financial frictions, and transition risk. Review of Economic Dynamics 51, 778–794.
  14. Climate sentiments, transition risk and financial stability in a stock-flow consistent model. Journal of Financial Stability 54, 100872.
  15. Hedging climate change news. The Review of Financial Studies 33, 1184–1216.
  16. The long run demand for lighting: Elasticities and rebound effects in different phases of economic development. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy 1, 83–99.
  17. Climate policy transition risk and the macroeconomy. European Economic Review 147, 104174.
  18. Induced technical change in energy and environmental modelling: Analytical approaches and policy implications. Annual Review of Energy and Environment 27, 271–308.
  19. Gruenspecht, H. (1982). Differentiated regulation: The case of auto emission standards. American Economic Review 72, 328–331.
  20. Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Applied Mathematical Sciences, No. 42. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  21. Hirshleifer, D. (1993). Managerial reputation and corporate investment decisions. Financial Management 22, 145–160.
  22. Evolutionary game dynamics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 40, 479–519.
  23. Evolutionary selection against dominated strategies. Journal of Economic Theory 71, 558–573.
  24. The persistence of environmental and social strategies under emission permits. Energy Economics 138, 107824.
  25. Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature 33, 132–163.
  26. Impact of environmental regulations on the U.S. steel industry. Carnegie Mellon University, mimeo.
  27. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review 75, 424–440.
  28. Watch your step: Optimal policy in a tipping climate. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6, 137–166.
  29. Role of design complexity in technology improvement. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science 108, 9008–9013.
  30. The cost of environmental protection. The Review of Economics and Statistics 83, 732–738.
  31. Differential environmental regulation: Effects on electric utility capital turnover and emissions. Review of Economics and Statistics 75, 368–373.
  32. Dissecting green returns. Journal of Financial Economics 146, 403–424.
  33. A low carbon industrial revolution? Insights and challenges from past technological and economic transformations. Energy Policy 50, 117–127.
  34. Intertemporal emission permits trading under uncertainty and irreversibility. Environmental and Resource Economics 71, 73–97.
  35. Porter, M. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American 264, 168.
  36. Porter, M. E. and C. Van der Linde (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, 97–118.
  37. Rodrik, D. (2014). Green industrial policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 30, 469–491.
  38. Rose, A. (1983). Modeling the macroeconomic impact of air pollution abatement. Journal of Regulatory Science 23, 441–459.
  39. Schmalensee, R. (1994). The costs of environmental protection. In M. B. Kotowski (Ed.), Balancing economic growth & environmental goals: Proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the American Council for Capital Formation Center for Policy Research, Washington, DC. American Council for Capital Formation.
  40. Sinn, H. (2008). Public policies against global warming: A supply-side approach. International Tax and Public Finance 15, 360–394.
  41. Sorrell, S. (2007). The rebound effect: An assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. UK Energy Research Centre, London.
  42. Unruh, G. (2000). Understanding carbon lock in. Energy Policy 28, 817–830.
  43. U.S. Office of Technology Assessment (1994). Industry, Technology and the Environment: Competitiveness, Challenges, and Business Opportunities. OTA-ITE-586.
  44. van den Bergh, C. (2012). Effective climate-energy solutions, escape routes and peak oil. Energy Policy 46, 530–536.
  45. van der Ploeg, F. and A. Rezai (2020). The risk of policy tipping and stranded carbon assets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 100, 102258.
  46. Xepapadeas, A. (2001). Environmental policy and firm behavior: Abatement investment and location decisions under uncertainty and irreversibility. In C. Carraro and G. E. Metcalf (Eds.), Behavioral and Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy, pp.  281–308. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  47. Zeppini, P. (2015). A discrete choice model of transitions to sustainable technologies. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 112, 187–203.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now