Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

ChunkRAG: Novel LLM-Chunk Filtering Method for RAG Systems (2410.19572v4)

Published 25 Oct 2024 in cs.CL

Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems using LLMs often generate inaccurate responses due to the retrieval of irrelevant or loosely related information. Existing methods, which operate at the document level, fail to effectively filter out such content. We propose LLM-driven chunk filtering, ChunkRAG, a framework that enhances RAG systems by evaluating and filtering retrieved information at the chunk level. Our approach employs semantic chunking to divide documents into coherent sections and utilizes LLM-based relevance scoring to assess each chunk's alignment with the user's query. By filtering out less pertinent chunks before the generation phase, we significantly reduce hallucinations and improve factual accuracy. Experiments show that our method outperforms existing RAG models, achieving higher accuracy on tasks requiring precise information retrieval. This advancement enhances the reliability of RAG systems, making them particularly beneficial for applications like fact-checking and multi-hop reasoning.

PDF HTML Abstract

An Analysis of ChunkRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems

The paper "ChunkRAG: Novel LLM-Chunk Filtering Method for RAG Systems" presents an innovative approach to addressing the persistent issue of retrieving irrelevant information within retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. By introducing a framework termed ChunkRAG, this research proposes an LLM-driven chunk filtering methodology designed to enhance factual accuracy and reliability. Through a detailed exploration of semantic chunking and relevance scoring, the paper outlines substantial improvements over traditional document-level retrieval methods.

Introduction and Motivation

RAG systems, which combine retrieval mechanisms with LLMs, often suffer from inaccurate outputs due to the inclusion of irrelevant or misleading data. This paper identifies the shortcomings of existing document-level retrieval techniques and proposes chunk-level filtering as a way to mitigate these inaccuracies. By dissecting documents into semantically coherent chunks and evaluating their relevance to specific queries, ChunkRAG aims to ensure that only pertinent information influences the generation phase.

Methodology

The proposed methodology involves a multi-faceted process:

  1. Semantic Chunking: Documents are divided into chunks of semantically related information, enabling a more granular analysis.
  2. Vector Store Creation: Chunk embeddings are stored in a vector store to facilitate similarity-based retrieval.
  3. Query Rewriting: The system employs LLMs to refine query expressions, enhancing retrieval precision.
  4. Advanced Relevance Scoring: Multiple layers of LLM-based scoring, including self-reflection and external critique, provide a robust mechanism for assessing chunk relevance.
  5. Dynamic Threshold Determination: The paper introduces adaptive thresholding to more effectively filter relevant chunks.

Experimental Evaluation

ChunkRAG was evaluated on the PopQA dataset, a standard benchmark for short-form question answering. The results demonstrated a notable improvement over existing methods, with ChunkRAG achieving a 64.9% accuracy rate—surpassing current baselines by a significant margin. Specifically, ChunkRAG outperformed its closest competitor, CRAG, by 10 percentage points, highlighting the efficacy of chunk-level filtering in reducing retrieval-related errors and increasing the system's reliability.

Implications and Future Directions

The research holds promising implications for applications requiring precise and factual information, such as fact-checking and multi-hop reasoning. By filtering content at a granular level, ChunkRAG enhances the ability of RAG systems to generate coherent and accurate responses, thus increasing their utility in complex problem-solving scenarios.

Future work may focus on extending the scalability of ChunkRAG to broader datasets such as Biography, PubHealth, and Arc-Challenge. Such evaluations would further substantiate its versatility across various applications. Additionally, optimizing computational efficiency and reducing the processing cost of multilevel scoring remain areas for potential improvement.

Conclusion

The development of ChunkRAG marks a substantive advancement in the field of retrieval-augmented generation. By effectively addressing the challenge of irrelevant information through innovative chunk filtering, this research offers a viable solution to enhance the precision and credibility of LLM-based retrieval systems. While limitations related to scalability and computational demand exist, the foundational contributions of ChunkRAG provide a solid groundwork for continued exploration and application in diverse domains.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. A. Asai et al. 2024. Self-rag: Self-reflective retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive tasks. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
  2. S. Bhakthavatsalam et al. 2021. Multi-hop reasoning with graph-based retrieval. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
  3. F. Dhuliawala et al. 2024. Cove65b: Enhancing factual accuracy through iterative engineering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12345.
  4. Y. Dubois et al. 2023. Instruction tuning for open-domain question answering. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS).
  5. Z. Ji et al. 2023. Survey of hallucination in generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02451.
  6. R. Johnson and T. Lee. 2023. Query rewriting for retrieval-augmented large language models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
  7. P. Lewis et al. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 9459–9474.
  8. C. Li et al. 2023. Factually consistent generation using self-reflection. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
  9. S. Liu et al. 2023. Redundancy removal in retrieval-augmented generation using cosine similarity. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
  10. H. Luo et al. 2023. Sail: Instruction tuning for enhanced retrieval-augmented generation.
  11. J. Mallen et al. 2023. Enhancing retrieval-augmented generation with fact-checking. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
  12. S. Min et al. 2023. Self-reflective mechanisms for improved retrieval-augmented generation. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
  13. A. Piktus et al. 2021. The role of chunking in retrieval-augmented generation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS).
  14. M. S. Rony et al. 2022. Fine-grained document retrieval for fact-checking tasks. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
  15. Y. Shi et al. 2023. Corrective retrieval in retrieval-augmented generation systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
  16. T. Smith et al. 2023. Multi-meta-rag for multi-hop queries using llm-extracted metadata. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING).
  17. H. Touvron et al. 2023. Llama2: Open and efficient large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12345.
  18. S. Your et al. 2024. Crag: Corrective retrieval-augmented generation. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
  19. A. Zhang and Others. 2023. Another title of the paper. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.56789.
  20. A. Zhang et al. 2023. Hallucination in large language models: A comprehensive survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12345.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Muhammad Taha (1 paper)
  2. Kevin Zhu (48 papers)
  3. Ishneet Sukhvinder Singh (1 paper)
  4. Ritvik Aggarwal (1 paper)
  5. Ibrahim Allahverdiyev (1 paper)
  6. Aslihan Akalin (3 papers)
  7. Sean O'Brien (29 papers)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

YouTube