Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Gaze estimation learning architecture as support to affective, social and cognitive studies in natural human-robot interaction (2410.19374v1)

Published 25 Oct 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: Gaze is a crucial social cue in any interacting scenario and drives many mechanisms of social cognition (joint and shared attention, predicting human intention, coordination tasks). Gaze direction is an indication of social and emotional functions affecting the way the emotions are perceived. Evidence shows that embodied humanoid robots endowing social abilities can be seen as sophisticated stimuli to unravel many mechanisms of human social cognition while increasing engagement and ecological validity. In this context, building a robotic perception system to automatically estimate the human gaze only relying on robot's sensors is still demanding. Main goal of the paper is to propose a learning robotic architecture estimating the human gaze direction in table-top scenarios without any external hardware. Table-top tasks are largely used in many studies in experimental psychology because they are suitable to implement numerous scenarios allowing agents to collaborate while maintaining a face-to-face interaction. Such an architecture can provide a valuable support in studies where external hardware might represent an obstacle to spontaneous human behaviour, especially in environments less controlled than the laboratory (e.g., in clinical settings). A novel dataset was also collected with the humanoid robot iCub, including images annotated from 24 participants in different gaze conditions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (55)
  1. Reginald B Adams Jr and Robert E Kleck. 2003. Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion. Psychological science 14, 6 (2003), 644–647.
  2. Reginald B Adams Jr and Robert E Kleck. 2005. Effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of facially communicated emotion. Emotion 5, 1 (2005), 3.
  3. A Controllable and Repeatable Method to Study Perceptual and Motor Adaptation in Human-Robot Interaction. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 188–192.
  4. One Eye is All You Need: Lightweight Ensembles for Gaze Estimation with Single Encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11936 (2022).
  5. Generalizing gaze estimation with rotation consistency. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 4207–4216.
  6. Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by observed gaze direction and emotional expression. Cognition 104, 3 (2007), 644–653.
  7. Roser Cañigueral and Antonia F de C Hamilton. 2019a. Being watched: Effects of an audience on eye gaze and prosocial behaviour. Acta psychologica 195 (2019), 50–63.
  8. Roser Cañigueral and Antonia F de C Hamilton. 2019b. The role of eye gaze during natural social interactions in typical and autistic people. Frontiers in psychology 10 (2019), 560.
  9. OpenPose: realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using Part Affinity Fields. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 43, 1 (2019), 172–186.
  10. Puregaze: Purifying gaze feature for generalizable gaze estimation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 36. 436–443.
  11. Yihua Cheng and Feng Lu. 2022. Gaze estimation using transformer. In 2022 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR). IEEE, 3341–3347.
  12. Gaze estimation by exploring two-eye asymmetry. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29 (2020), 5259–5272.
  13. Connecting gaze, scene, and attention: Generalized attention estimation via joint modeling of gaze and scene saliency. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). 383–398.
  14. Connecting Gaze, Scene, and Attention: Generalized Attention Estimation via Joint Modeling of Gaze and Scene Saliency. In The European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV).
  15. Mental state attribution and the gaze cueing effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 77 (2015), 1105–1115.
  16. Watching Eyes effects: When others meet the self. Consciousness and cognition 45 (2016), 184–197.
  17. Gergely Csibra and György Gergely. 2011. Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366, 1567 (2011), 1149–1157.
  18. Social modulators of gaze-mediated orienting of attention: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 27 (2020), 833–855.
  19. Gaze estimation for assisted living environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. 290–299.
  20. Martin J Doherty. 2006. The development of mentalistic gaze understanding. Infant and Child Development: An International Journal of Research and Practice 15, 2 (2006), 179–186.
  21. Chris Kelland Friesen and Alan Kingstone. 1998. The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic bulletin & review 5, 3 (1998), 490–495.
  22. Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological bulletin 133, 4 (2007), 694.
  23. Nonverbal communication. Annual review of psychology 70 (2019), 271–294.
  24. Jari K Hietanen. 2018. Affective eye contact: an integrative review. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 1587.
  25. Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach–avoidance motivational brain systems. Neuropsychologia 46, 9 (2008), 2423–2430.
  26. Laura Hoffmann and Nicole C Krämer. 2021. The persuasive power of robot touch. Behavioral and evaluative consequences of non-functional touch from a robot. Plos one 16, 5 (2021), e0249554.
  27. Adult’s eyes trigger shifts of visual attention in human infants. Psychological Science 9, 2 (1998), 131–134.
  28. The measurement of eye contact in human interactions: A scoping review. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 44 (2020), 363–389.
  29. Comparison of human social brain activity during eye-contact with another human and a humanoid robot. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7 (2021), 599581.
  30. A method for stochastic optimization. In International conference on learning representations (ICLR), Vol. 5. San Diego, California;, 6.
  31. On the role of eye contact in gaze cueing. Scientific reports 8, 1 (2018), 1–10.
  32. Eye tracking for everyone. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2176–2184.
  33. Believe it or not, we know what you are looking at!. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 35–50.
  34. Emotional gaze: The effects of gaze direction on the perception of facial emotions. Frontiers in psychology 12 (2021), 684357.
  35. Toward an attentive robotic architecture: Learning-based mutual gaze estimation in Human–Robot Interaction. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 9 (2022), 770165.
  36. The impact of facial expression and communicative gaze of a humanoid robot on individual Sense of Agency. Scientific Reports 13, 1 (2023), 10113.
  37. Don’t overthink: fast decision making combined with behavior variability perceived as more human-like. In 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 54–59.
  38. Visual attentional orienting by eye gaze: A meta-analytic review of the gaze-cueing effect. Psychological Bulletin 147, 12 (2021), 1269.
  39. YARP: yet another robot platform. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 3, 1 (2006), 8.
  40. The iCub humanoid robot: an open-systems platform for research in cognitive development. Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society 23, 8-9 (2010), 1125–34.
  41. Individual differences and the development of joint attention in infancy. Child development 78, 3 (2007), 938–954.
  42. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011), 2825–2830.
  43. Michael I Posner. 1980. Orienting of attention. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology 32, 1 (1980), 3–25.
  44. Where are they looking? Advances in neural information processing systems 28 (2015).
  45. Philippe Rochat and Tricia Striano. 2014. Social-cognitive development in the first year. In Early social cognition. Psychology Press, 3–34.
  46. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature neuroscience 6, 12 (2003), 1317–1322.
  47. An analysis of the conceptual foundations of the infant preferential looking paradigm. Human Development 57, 4 (2014), 222–240.
  48. 3DGazeNet: Generalizing Gaze Estimation with Weak-Supervision from Synthetic Views. arXiv e-prints (2022), arXiv–2212.
  49. Contrastive regression for domain adaptation on gaze estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 19376–19385.
  50. The use of gaze to study cognition: limitations, solutions, and applications to animal welfare. Frontiers in Psychology 14 (2023), 1147278.
  51. Agnieszka Wykowska. 2020. Social robots to test flexibility of human social cognition. International Journal of Social Robotics 12, 6 (2020), 1203–1211.
  52. Agnieszka Wykowska. 2021. Robots as mirrors of the human mind. Current Directions in Psychological Science 30, 1 (2021), 34–40.
  53. Xiyang Yin. 2022. Influences of eye gaze cues on memory and its mechanisms: The function and evolution of social attention. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022), 1036530.
  54. It’s written all over your face: Full-face appearance-based gaze estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. 51–60.
  55. Learning to draw sight lines. International Journal of Computer Vision 128 (2020), 1076–1100.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.