Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Not All Heads Matter: A Head-Level KV Cache Compression Method with Integrated Retrieval and Reasoning (2410.19258v3)

Published 25 Oct 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: Key-Value (KV) caching is a common technique to enhance the computational efficiency of LLMs, but its memory overhead grows rapidly with input length. Prior work has shown that not all tokens are equally important for text generation, proposing layer-level KV cache compression to selectively retain key information. Recognizing the distinct roles of attention heads in generation, we propose HeadKV, a head-level KV cache compression method, and HeadKV-R2, which leverages a novel contextual reasoning ability estimation for compression. Our approach operates at the level of individual heads, estimating their importance for contextual QA tasks that require both retrieval and reasoning capabilities. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks (LongBench, LooGLE), model architectures (e.g., Llama-3-8B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct), and long-context abilities tests demonstrate that our head-level KV cache compression significantly outperforms strong baselines, particularly in low-resource settings (KV size = 64 & 128). Notably, our method retains just 1.5% of the KV cache while achieving 97% of the performance of the full KV cache on the contextual question answering benchmark.Codes are available at https://github.com/FYYFU/HeadKV

Essay on: "Not All Heads Matter: A Head-Level KV Cache Compression Method with Integrated Retrieval and Reasoning"

Introduction

The paper "Not All Heads Matter: A Head-Level KV Cache Compression Method with Integrated Retrieval and Reasoning" presents an innovative approach to KV cache optimization in LLMs. The authors propose HeadKV and HeadKV-R2, emphasizing head-level rather than layer-level KV cache compression. By focusing on the distinct roles of attention heads, this method aims to improve memory efficiency without sacrificing performance—a critical advancement as LLMs address increasingly long inputs.

Methodology

The core idea of this research is to leverage the heterogeneous importance of attention heads. Traditional methods focus on token or layer-level compression, but these can overlook the nuanced roles that different heads play in retrieval and reasoning tasks. The authors propose an advanced method that estimates the contextual reasoning ability of each head to determine its significance. These importance scores are then used to distribute KV cache resources efficiently.

To achieve this, they provide a comprehensive KV cache allocation strategy across heads, considering their individual importance scores derived from specialized tests. The proposed tests include the Needle-in-a-Haystack and Reasoning-in-a-Haystack tasks, which uniquely assess both retrieval and reasoning capabilities.

Results

The results of the paper are extensive and significant across multiple datasets and models:

  • When using a minimal KV cache size (retaining only 1.5\% of the original cache), HeadKV-R2 maintained 97\% of the performance achieved by the full cache in contextual QA tasks.
  • The approach outperformed existing layer-level KV cache compression methods, especially in resource-constrained settings where efficient cache use is crucial.
  • Importantly, the HeadKV-R2 also achieved better performance than the full KV cache in some configurations, particularly with reduced memory and latency demands.

Implications and Future Directions

This head-level approach to KV cache compression presents multiple implications for both practical and theoretical advancements in LLMs:

  • Optimization for Future LLMs: By demonstrating how selective retention and reasoning assessments can optimize cache use, this method offers a blueprint for developing more efficient and scalable LLM architectures.
  • Extended Applications: Beyond typical language tasks, these methods can be adapted for use in other domains requiring large context handling, such as real-time translation or long-form content generation.

Moving forward, exploring further types of heads, like those involved in truthfulness or in-context learning, could yield even more refined compression strategies. Moreover, the development of task-specific score estimation algorithms using gradients from specific tasks could enhance the adaptability and accuracy of head-level compression.

Conclusion

"Not All Heads Matter" provides a substantial contribution to the field of computational efficiency in LLMs by introducing a novel head-level compression method. By integrating retrieval and reasoning assessments, the authors demonstrate an effective model that respects the distinct functionalities of different attention heads. This work has set a new path for future research, pushing towards more intelligent, efficient, and contextually aware LLMs.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (37)
  1. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023.
  2. Anthropic. The claude 3 model family: Opus, sonnet, haiku, March 2024. URL https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/de8ba9b01c9ab7cbabf5c33b80b7bbc618857627/Model_Card_Claude_3.pdf. Accessed: 2024-07-09.
  3. LongBench: A bilingual, multitask benchmark for long context understanding. In Lun-Wei Ku, Andre Martins, and Vivek Srikumar (eds.), Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp.  3119–3137, Bangkok, Thailand, August 2024. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.172. URL https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.172.
  4. Pyramidkv: Dynamic kv cache compression based on pyramidal information funneling, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02069.
  5. Accelerating large language model decoding with speculative sampling, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.01318.
  6. Tri Dao. FlashAttention-2: Faster attention with better parallelism and work partitioning. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2024.
  7. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783, 2024.
  8. Ada-kv: Optimizing kv cache eviction by adaptive budget allocation for efficient llm inference, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11550.
  9. Constructing a multi-hop QA dataset for comprehensive evaluation of reasoning steps. In Donia Scott, Nuria Bel, and Chengqing Zong (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp.  6609–6625, Barcelona, Spain (Online), December 2020. International Committee on Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.580. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.coling-main.580.
  10. Mistral 7b, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06825.
  11. Cutting off the head ends the conflict: A mechanism for interpreting and mitigating knowledge conflicts in language models, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18154.
  12. An empirical survey on long document summarization: Datasets, models, and metrics. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(8):1–35, December 2022. ISSN 1557-7341. doi: 10.1145/3545176. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3545176.
  13. Babilong: Testing the limits of llms with long context reasoning-in-a-haystack, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10149.
  14. A fast post-training pruning framework for transformers. In Alice H. Oh, Alekh Agarwal, Danielle Belgrave, and Kyunghyun Cho (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=0GRBKLBjJE.
  15. Streamingdialogue: Prolonged dialogue learning via long context compression with minimal losses, 2024a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08312.
  16. Loogle: Can long-context language models understand long contexts?, 2024b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04939.
  17. Inference-time intervention: Eliciting truthful answers from a language model. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=aLLuYpn83y.
  18. Needlebench: Can llms do retrieval and reasoning in 1 million context window?, 2024c. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11963.
  19. Snapkv: Llm knows what you are looking for before generation, 2024d. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14469.
  20. In-context learning and induction heads, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.11895.
  21. Compressive transformers for long-range sequence modelling. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=SylKikSYDH.
  22. Noam Shazeer. Fast transformer decoding: One write-head is all you need, 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.02150.
  23. Layer-wise pruning of transformer attention heads for efficient language modeling, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.03252.
  24. Razorattention: Efficient kv cache compression through retrieval heads, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15891.
  25. Attention is all you need. In I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf.
  26. Analyzing multi-head self-attention: Specialized heads do the heavy lifting, the rest can be pruned. In Anna Korhonen, David Traum, and Lluís Màrquez (eds.), Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.  5797–5808, Florence, Italy, July 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/P19-1580. URL https://aclanthology.org/P19-1580.
  27. Towards ai-complete question answering: A set of prerequisite toy tasks, 2015. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.05698.
  28. Retrieval head mechanistically explains long-context factuality, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15574.
  29. Efficient streaming language models with attention sinks. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=NG7sS51zVF.
  30. Extractive summarization of long documents by combining global and local context. In Kentaro Inui, Jing Jiang, Vincent Ng, and Xiaojun Wan (eds.), Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp.  3011–3021, Hong Kong, China, November 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/D19-1298. URL https://aclanthology.org/D19-1298.
  31. A critical evaluation of evaluations for long-form question answering, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18201.
  32. Qwen2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10671, 2024.
  33. Chunkattention: Efficient self-attention with prefix-aware kv cache and two-phase partition, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15220.
  34. A survey on recent advances in llm-based multi-turn dialogue systems, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18013.
  35. H2o: Heavy-hitter oracle for efficient generative inference of large language models. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=RkRrPp7GKO.
  36. Attention heads of large language models: A survey, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03752.
  37. A survey on efficient inference for large language models, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14294.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Yu Fu (86 papers)
  2. Zefan Cai (26 papers)
  3. Abedelkadir Asi (3 papers)
  4. Wayne Xiong (10 papers)
  5. Yue Dong (61 papers)
  6. Wen Xiao (32 papers)
Citations (1)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com