Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Investigating Developers' Preferences for Learning and Issue Resolution Resources in the ChatGPT Era (2410.08411v1)

Published 10 Oct 2024 in cs.SE

Abstract: The landscape of software developer learning resources has continuously evolved, with recent trends favoring engaging formats like video tutorials. The emergence of LLMs like ChatGPT presents a new learning paradigm. While existing research explores the potential of LLMs in software development and education, their impact on developers' learning and solution-seeking behavior remains unexplored. To address this gap, we conducted a survey targeting software developers and computer science students, gathering 341 responses, of which 268 were completed and analyzed. This study investigates how AI chatbots like ChatGPT have influenced developers' learning preferences when acquiring new skills, exploring technologies, and resolving programming issues. Through quantitative and qualitative analysis, we explore whether AI tools supplement or replace traditional learning resources such as video tutorials, written tutorials, and Q&A forums. Our findings reveal a nuanced view: while video tutorials continue to be highly preferred for their comprehensive coverage, a significant number of respondents view AI chatbots as potential replacements for written tutorials, underscoring a shift towards more interactive and personalized learning experiences. Additionally, AI chatbots are increasingly considered valuable supplements to video tutorials, indicating their growing role in the developers' learning resources. These insights offer valuable directions for educators and the software development community by shedding light on the evolving preferences toward learning resources in the era of ChatGPT.

Summary

  • The paper reveals developers' preference shifts as they increasingly adopt ChatGPT for real-time learning and troubleshooting.
  • It employs surveys and empirical analysis to compare the effectiveness of traditional documentation with AI-driven tools.
  • The findings indicate a notable trend favoring AI support, suggesting future enhancements in developer documentation and community practices.

Overview of the LaTeX Conference Paper Model Document

This documentation outlines the structure and content of a sample conference paper modeled in LaTeX, emphasizing best practices and instructions aligned with IEEE conference standards. The document serves as a guide to facilitate authors in formatting and styling their submissions accurately.

Content Structure and Specifications

The document is systematically divided into various sections that address essential aspects of preparing and submitting a paper to IEEE conferences. Key sections include:

  • Ease of Use: This section underscores the importance of adhering to the specified IEEEtran class file settings for formatting papers. Authors are advised not to alter pre-set margins, column widths, or text fonts, ensuring uniformity across conference proceedings.
  • Paper Preparation: Authors are instructed to draft their content separately and ensure comprehensive proofreading and editing before applying the prescribed format. Organizing text and graphic files separately is recommended until styling is finalized.
  • Units and Equations: The document specifies the use of SI units as preferred and discourages the mixing of unit systems. Similarly, it provides guidelines for equation formatting, including the use of appropriate mathematical symbols and the punctuating of equations within text where necessary.

Technical Considerations

In detailing technical guidelines, the document provides advice specific to LaTeX users:

  • Cross-Referencing: Authors are encouraged to use "soft" cross references to enable seamless content adaptation without manual line-by-line adjustments when altering document structure.
  • Common LaTeX Issues: Common pitfalls such as improper usage of eqnarray and array environments and labeling errors are outlined to prevent submission errors that could hinder publication.

Organizational Elements

The paper stresses the significance of organizational components like headings and affiliations. Proper heading hierarchy, such as the use of text and component heads, is crucial to guide readers through the paper's content efficiently.

Illustrative Elements

The document delineates the presentation of figures and tables, suggesting strategic placement within the text to maintain the flow of content and ease of comprehension. Standards for labeling figures and formatting tables are also outlined to ensure clarity and avoid misinterpretation.

Implications and Future Considerations

While the document itself is procedural, its implications for efficient paper submissions are noteworthy. By adhering to these guidelines, authors enhance the professionalism of their work and improve the likelihood of successful publication. This template also aids in maintaining consistency across publications, which is crucial for the integrity and accessibility of scholarly communications.

In terms of future developments, continued refinement of such templates could involve the integration of automated formatting checking tools or AI-driven suggestions for content organization, further easing the burden on authors and reviewers alike. The consistent application of these standards will underpin the evolving landscape of academic publishing, particularly as digital transformation continues to shape the manner in which scholarly content is consumed and produced.