Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
60 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

BabelBench: An Omni Benchmark for Code-Driven Analysis of Multimodal and Multistructured Data (2410.00773v1)

Published 1 Oct 2024 in cs.AI and cs.CL
BabelBench: An Omni Benchmark for Code-Driven Analysis of Multimodal and Multistructured Data

Abstract: LLMs have become increasingly pivotal across various domains, especially in handling complex data types. This includes structured data processing, as exemplified by ChartQA and ChatGPT-Ada, and multimodal unstructured data processing as seen in Visual Question Answering (VQA). These areas have attracted significant attention from both industry and academia. Despite this, there remains a lack of unified evaluation methodologies for these diverse data handling scenarios. In response, we introduce BabelBench, an innovative benchmark framework that evaluates the proficiency of LLMs in managing multimodal multistructured data with code execution. BabelBench incorporates a dataset comprising 247 meticulously curated problems that challenge the models with tasks in perception, commonsense reasoning, logical reasoning, and so on. Besides the basic capabilities of multimodal understanding, structured data processing as well as code generation, these tasks demand advanced capabilities in exploration, planning, reasoning and debugging. Our experimental findings on BabelBench indicate that even cutting-edge models like ChatGPT 4 exhibit substantial room for improvement. The insights derived from our comprehensive analysis offer valuable guidance for future research within the community. The benchmark data can be found at https://github.com/FFD8FFE/babelbench.

BabelBench: An Omni Benchmark for Code-Driven Analysis of Multimodal and Multistructured Data

The paper "BabelBench: An Omni Benchmark for Code-Driven Analysis of Multimodal and Multistructured Data" introduces a novel benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs on their ability to process multimodal and multistructured data. This benchmark is particularly timely given the increasing application of LLMs in complex data handling, which includes structured data, multimodal unstructured data, and their integration. BabelBench aims to bridge the gap in current evaluation methodologies by providing a comprehensive framework to test LLMs on a wide array of tasks, involving both perception and reasoning.

Overview of BabelBench

BabelBench is composed of 247 expertly curated tasks, each designed to challenge LLMs in multimodal understanding, structured data interpretation, and code generation. These tasks range across diverse categories such as perception (e.g., counting, color recognition, optical character recognition) and reasoning (e.g., commonsense reasoning, logical reasoning, spatial reasoning). The difficulty levels span easy, medium, and hard, ensuring a balanced evaluation of LLM capabilities.

Experimental Setup

The BabelBench dataset was meticulously annotated by domain experts, ensuring high-quality, unbiased, and complex questions. The benchmarks cover various real-world scenarios, simulated through tasks that require advanced capabilities such as exploration, planning, reasoning, and debugging. This comprehensive approach reveals significant gaps in current LLM performance, even for state-of-the-art models like ChatGPT 4.

Key Findings

Performance Metrics: The evaluation results show that ChatGPT 4 achieves the highest accuracy at 42.11%, which indicates substantial room for improvement. Other models, including GPT-4o, Gemini-pro-1.5, and Claude3, also demonstrate below-par performance across several metrics. This underscores the complexity of the tasks posed by BabelBench and the current limitations of LLMs in handling such data-intensive challenges.

Multistructured Data Analysis: The performance of LLMs shows variability when dealing with multimodal and multistructured data. For instance, tasks involving both images and tables pose different challenges compared to those involving a single data type. This highlights the need for further research into optimizing LLMs for multimodal and multistructured data scenarios.

Task Difficulty and Capability Assessment: The experimental results indicate that LLMs perform better on easier tasks, yet they considerably struggle with medium and hard tasks. Performance also varies significantly across different capability categories, such as spatial reasoning, mathematical reasoning, counting, and OCR. This granular insight into LLM performance across different dimensions of intelligence is a significant contribution of BabelBench.

Implications and Future Directions

The research implies that current LLMs, including advanced versions like GPT-4, are not yet fully equipped to handle the intricacies of multimodal and multistructured data. From a practical standpoint, this suggests that reliance on LLMs for real-world tasks involving complex data types should be cautious and well-considered.

Practical Implications

  1. Application Specificity: Utilizing LLMs for tasks in domains like healthcare, finance, and traffic management, which require integration of diverse data types, remains challenging.
  2. Tool Interaction: Enhancing LLMs with the ability to effectively utilize external tools and align multimodal data inputs is crucial.

Theoretical Implications

  1. Unified Data Processing: Developing methods for more seamless integration and understanding of multimodal multistructured data.
  2. Advanced Reasoning: Improving the reasoning capabilities of LLMs to handle complex dependency structures and multimodal inferences.

Future Research

Future developments in AI and LLM research should focus on bridging the identified gaps:

  • Enhanced Multimodal Frameworks: Design of LLMs with better alignment and interaction capabilities with diverse data types.
  • Scale and Scope of Benchmarks: Expanding BabelBench to include more extensive datasets and varied real-world scenarios.
  • Error Analysis and Debugging: Refining LLMs' ability to self-correct and debug based on interactions with external environments.

In conclusion, BabelBench sets a new benchmark for evaluating LLMs on multimodal and multistructured data. The insights derived from this research are critical for guiding future AI developments towards more intelligent and versatile LLM-as-Agent systems capable of addressing the diverse and complex challenges posed by real-world applications.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (19)
  1. Xuwu Wang (12 papers)
  2. Qiwen Cui (18 papers)
  3. Yunzhe Tao (20 papers)
  4. Yiran Wang (78 papers)
  5. Ziwei Chai (8 papers)
  6. Xiaotian Han (46 papers)
  7. Boyi Liu (49 papers)
  8. Jianbo Yuan (33 papers)
  9. Jing Su (47 papers)
  10. Guoyin Wang (108 papers)
  11. Tingkai Liu (9 papers)
  12. Liyu Chen (22 papers)
  13. Tianyi Liu (58 papers)
  14. Tao Sun (143 papers)
  15. Yufeng Zhang (67 papers)
  16. Sirui Zheng (5 papers)
  17. Quanzeng You (41 papers)
  18. Yang Yang (883 papers)
  19. Hongxia Yang (130 papers)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com